Coping with the Cornucopia: Can Text Mining Help Handle the Data Deluge in Public Policy Analysis?

Information and communication technologies such as the Internet have created a plethora of opportunities for the participation of citizens in policymaking. In the United Kingdom, for instance, this trend has emerged at national and local levels, in domains as diverse as Education, the Environment and Health Care. Given a general renewal of interest in incorporating public opinion into policymaking, devices such as online consultations and electronic surveys have rendered the appeal to ‘the people’ seemingly easier. But an important problem arising from involving the public in decision-making exercises through large-scale electronic participatory devices is the amount of textual data generated. Although there is now a large body of literature devoted to commentating and analysing ways in which politicians ought to be involved in listening and responding to public participation in decision-making, issues pertaining to the implementation of such exercises in the light of the volume of information that they produce have largely remained unexplored. In this paper, we assess the potential benefits and shortcomings of using Text Mining methods for the analysis of large-scale consultations submitted via Internet. To this end, the paper reports on the application of computer-aided text analysis to a public consultation organised by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in 2008 on ‘End of Life Medicines’.

[1]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  New fashions in public participation: towards greater democracy? , 1999 .

[2]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  T. Reddel,et al.  From consultation to participatory governance? A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland , 2004 .

[4]  N. Roberts Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation , 2004 .

[5]  Ian Budge,et al.  New Challenge of Direct Democracy , 1996 .

[6]  Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey The Congressional Debate on Partial-Birth Abortion: Constitutional Gravitas and Moral Passion , 2008, British Journal of Political Science.

[7]  Benjamin R. Barber,et al.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[8]  Alvin Toffler Creating A New Civilization , 1994 .

[9]  M. Mort,et al.  Praise and Damnation: Mental Health User Groups and the Construction of Organisational Legitimacy , 1997 .

[10]  B. F. Sharf Beyond Netiquette: The Ethics of Doing Naturalistic Discourse Research on the Internet , 1999 .

[11]  Lawrence C. Walters,et al.  Putting More Public in Policy Analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Judith Bara,et al.  Analysing Parliamentary Debate with Computer Assistance , 2007 .

[13]  A. Toffler,et al.  Creating a new civilization : the politics of the Third Wave , 1995 .

[14]  M. Calnan,et al.  Managerialism and active citizenship in Britain's reformed health service: power and community in an era of decentralisation. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[15]  Timo Honkela,et al.  Websom for Textual Data Mining , 1999, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[16]  L. Nelson Data, data everywhere. , 1997, Critical care medicine.

[17]  N. Allum A social representations approach to the comparison of three textual corpora using Alceste , 2020 .

[18]  Marian Barnes,et al.  Users as citizens: collective action and the local governance of welfare , 1999 .

[19]  R. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation in the New NHS: No Closer to Citizen Control? , 2002 .

[20]  Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey Measuring Ideas More Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry's National Security Speeches , 2005, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[21]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[22]  Mathieu Brugidou Argumentation And Values: An Analysis of Ordinary Political Competence via an Open-Ended Question , 2003 .

[23]  E Pieri ID Cards: A snapshot of the debate in the UK press. Project Report. , 2009 .

[24]  Iain McLean Democracy and new technology , 1989 .

[25]  F. Guerin-pace Textual statistics: an exploratory tool for the social sciences. , 1998, Population. English selection.

[26]  Robert Gellman,et al.  The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age , 1997 .

[27]  A. Reinert,et al.  Une méthode de classification descendante hiérarchique : application à l'analyse lexicale par contexte , 1983 .

[28]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[29]  S. Lahlou A Method to Extract Social Representations from Linguistic Corpora , 1996 .

[30]  Jaideep Srivastava,et al.  Web mining: information and pattern discovery on the World Wide Web , 1997, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.

[31]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Computer analysis and qualitative research , 1998 .

[32]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[33]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[34]  Ivan Koprić,et al.  Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making , 2006 .

[35]  D. Butler Data, data everywhere... , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[36]  M. Laver,et al.  Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[37]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Characterizing Buzz and Sentiment in Internet Sources: Linguistic Summaries and Predictive Behaviors , 2006, Computing Attitude and Affect in Text.