A new hybrid procedure for the definition of seismic vulnerability in Mediterranean cross-border urban areas

Assessment of seismic vulnerability of urban areas provides fundamental information for activities of planning and management of emergencies. The main difficulty encountered when extending vulnerability evaluations to urban contexts is the definition of a framework of assessment appropriate for the specific characteristics of the site and providing reliable results with a reasonable duration of surveys and post-processing of data. The paper proposes a new procedure merging different typologies of information recognized on the territories investigated and for this reason called “hybrid.” Knowledge of historical events influencing urban evolution and analysis of recurrent building technologies are used to evaluate the vulnerability indexes of buildings and building stocks. On the other hand, a vulnerability model is calibrated by means of experimental and numerical investigations on prototype buildings representative of the most recurrent typologies. In the final framework, the vulnerability index, calculated through simplified assessment forms, is linked to the seismic intensity expressed by the peak ground acceleration and associated with an index of damage expressing the economical loss. The procedure has been tested on the urban center of Lampedusa island (Italy) providing as the output vulnerability index maps, vulnerability curves, critical PGA maps, and estimation of the economical damage associated with different earthquake scenarios. The application of the procedure can be suitably repeated for medium-to-small urban areas, typically recurring in the Mediterranean by carrying out each time a recalibration of the vulnerability model.

[1]  Rajesh P. Dhakal,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Performance Evaluation of Non Seismic RC Frame buildings , 2009 .

[2]  Tiziana Rossetto,et al.  Seismic vulnerability functions for Australian buildings by using GEM empirical vulnerability assessment guidelines , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[3]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Evaluation of analytical methodologies used to derive vulnerability functions , 2014 .

[4]  Robert V. Whitman,et al.  HAZUS Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods , 2006 .

[5]  S. Lagomarsino,et al.  Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings , 2006 .

[6]  24 .-Some Experimental Results on the Strength of Brick Masonry Walls , 2022 .

[7]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design , 1994 .

[8]  T. Rossettoa,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[9]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Urban seismic risk index for Medellín, Colombia, based on probabilistic loss and casualties estimations , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[10]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design , 2000 .

[11]  É. Bertrand,et al.  THE EUROPEAN RISK-UE PROJECT : AN ADVANCED APPROACH TO EARTHQUAKE RISK SCENARIOS , 2002 .

[12]  Tiziana Rossetto,et al.  Assessing the impact of ground-motion variability and uncertainty on empirical fragility curves , 2015 .

[13]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement , 1994 .

[14]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Valutazione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici scolastici della provincia di Potenza , 2004 .

[15]  V. Petrini,et al.  Censimento di vulnerabilità degli edifici pubblici, strategici e speciali nelle regioni Abruzzo, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Molise, Puglia e Sicilia – Cap. 4: Risultati del Progetto , 1999 .