Science-Technology-Industry Links and the ”European Paradox”: Some Notes on the Dynamics of Scientific and Technological Research in Europe

This paper discusses, first, the properties of scientific and technological knowledge and the institutions supporting its generation and its economic applications. The evidence continues to support the broad interpretation which we call the ”Stanford-Yale-Sussex” synthesis. Second, such patterns bear important implications with respect to the so-called ”European Paradox”, i.e. the conjecture that EU countries play a leading global role in terms of top-level scientific output, but lag behind in the ability of converting this strength into wealth-generating innovations. Some descriptive evidence shows that, contrary to the ”paradox” conjecture, European weaknesses reside both in its system of scientific research and in a relatively weak industry. The final part of the work suggests a few normative implications: much less emphasis should be put on various types of ”networking” and much more on policy measures aimed to both strengthen ”frontier” research and strengthen European corporate actors.

[1]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  T. Dublin,et al.  Research policy , 2021, The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics.

[3]  Russel E. Kaufman,et al.  “Science, the Endless Frontier” , 1960, Nature.

[4]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[5]  M. Polanyi The Republic of science , 1962 .

[6]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[7]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[8]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977 .

[9]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. , 1976 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[11]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[12]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[13]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The objectives of technology policy , 1987 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[15]  Stuart Holland,et al.  The market economy , 1987 .

[16]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[17]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[18]  P. David Knowledge, Property, and the System Dynamics of Technological Change , 1992 .

[19]  B. Lundvall National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[20]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[21]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[22]  C. Martin,et al.  SA science and technology indicators , 1994 .

[23]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[24]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[25]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .

[26]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[27]  G. Dosi,et al.  Learning in Evolutionary Environments , 1996 .

[28]  E. Garfield Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? , 1996 .

[29]  T. Wilkie The Economic Laws of Scientific Research , 1996 .

[30]  J. Bergenius Commentaries , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[31]  Paul A. David,et al.  FROM MARKET MAGIC TO CALYPSO SCIENCE POLICY A Review of Terence Kealey's The Economic Laws of Scientific Research , 1997 .

[32]  J. Wallmark,et al.  Inventions and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers University of Technology , 1997 .

[33]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[34]  C. Freeman,et al.  The Economics of Industrial Innovation - 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[35]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation , 1998 .

[36]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[37]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[38]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership , 1999 .

[39]  Richard Florida,et al.  The Role of the University: Leveraging Talent, not Technology. , 1999 .

[40]  K. Pavitt Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation , 1999 .

[41]  Frédéric Koessler,et al.  Tie-breaking Rules and Informational Cascades: A Note , 2000 .

[42]  Giuseppe Diana Wage Indexation, Central Bank Independence and the Cost of Disinflation , 2000 .

[43]  Marc Gaudry,et al.  Turning Box-Cox Including Quadratic Forms in Regression , 2000 .

[44]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[45]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Research excellence and patented innovation , 2000 .

[46]  Sylvie Duchassaing,et al.  Can we consider the policy instruments as cyclical substitutes? Some Empirical Evidence , 2000 .

[47]  Ulrich Kaiser,et al.  The Performance of German Firms in the Business-Related Service Sectors: A Dynamic Analysis , 2004 .

[48]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Diversity of innovative strategy as a source of technological performance , 2002 .

[49]  Jean-Alain Héraud,et al.  Impact économique régional d'un pôle universitaire : application au cas Strasbourgeois , 2001 .

[50]  N. Phu,et al.  Economic growth and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric approach , 2001 .

[51]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Public Policies to Support Basic Research: What Can the Rest of the World Learn from US Theory and Practice? (And What They Should Not Learn) , 2001 .

[52]  André Schmitt,et al.  Improving the Prevention of Environmental Risks with Convertible Bonds , 2005 .

[53]  Phu Nguyen-Van,et al.  Determinants of Environmental and Economic Performance of Firms: An Empirical Analysis of the European Paper Industry , 2001 .

[54]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output , 2001 .

[55]  Phu Nguyen Van Endogenous Population and Environmental Quality , 2002 .

[56]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Networks of Inventors and the Location of University Research: An Exploration of Italian Data , 2002 .

[57]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technology and the Economy , 2002 .

[58]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Cumulative Causation and Evolutionary Micro-Founded Technical Change: A Growth Model with Integrated Economies , 2003 .

[59]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium , 2003 .

[60]  T. Azomahou,et al.  Relativité de la satisfaction dans la vie : une étude sur données de panel , 2003 .

[61]  Homothetic or Cobb-Douglas Behavior Through Aggregation , 2003 .

[62]  T. Azomahou,et al.  Déforestation, croissance économique et population , 2003 .

[63]  Phu Nguyen Van A semiparametric analysis of determinants of a protected area , 2003 .

[64]  T. Azomahou,et al.  Deforestation, croissance economique et population Une etude sur donnees de panel , 2003 .

[65]  Thomas Seegmuller Endogenous Fluctuations and Public Services in a Simple OLG Economy , 2003 .

[66]  R. Nelson The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[67]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance , 2003 .

[68]  Frédéric Koessler,et al.  The Favorite-Longshot Bias in Sequential Parimutuel Betting with Non-Expected Utility Players , 2003 .

[69]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  The Changing Social Contract for Science and the Evolution of the University , 2003 .

[70]  R. Nelson On the Uneven Evolution of Human Know-How , 2003 .

[71]  Thomas Seegmuller Concurrence imparfaite, variabilité du taux de marge et fluctuations endogènes , 2003, Recherches économiques de Louvain.

[72]  Thomas Seegmuller,et al.  Pollution as a source of endogenous fluctuations and periodic welfare inequality in OLG economies , 2004 .

[73]  Moïse Sidiropoulos,et al.  Central Bank Independence, Speed of Disinflation and the Sacrifice Ratio , 2004 .

[74]  D. King The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[75]  R. Amir,et al.  On Taxation Pass-Through for a Monopoly Firm , 2004 .

[76]  Paul A. David,et al.  Understanding the emergence of 'open science' institutions: functionalist economics in historical context , 2004 .

[77]  Semiparametric Analysis of the Regional Convergence Process , 2004 .

[78]  C. Noussair,et al.  Parimutuel Betting under Asymmetric Information , 2008 .

[79]  Thi Kim Cuong Pham Wealth distribution, endogenous fiscal policy and growth: status-seeking implications , 2004 .

[80]  Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Sectoral dynamics and structural change: stylized facts and “system of innovation” approaches , 2004 .

[81]  L. Buisson Madison–Strasbourg, une analyse comparative de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche en France et aux États–Unis à travers l’exemple de deux campus , 2005 .

[82]  T. D. N. Thi,et al.  Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research , 2005 .

[83]  The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics: Perspectives on technological evolution , 2005 .

[84]  Phu Nguyen Van Distribution Dynamics of CO2 Emissions , 2005 .

[85]  Les modèles de type Mundell–Fleming revisités , 2005 .

[86]  Thomas Seegmuller,et al.  Environment in an Overlapping Generations Economy with Endogenous Labor Supply : a Dynamic Analysis , 2005 .

[87]  Julien Pénin,et al.  Open knowledge disclosure, incomplete information and collective innovations , 2005 .

[88]  Blandine Zimmer,et al.  Is monetary union necessarily counterproductive , 2005 .

[89]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  « Factors Affecting University-Industry R&D Collaboration : The importance of screening and signalling » , 2005 .

[90]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance , 2005 .

[91]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Patent Production at a European Research University: Exploratory Evidence at the Laboratory Level , 2006 .

[92]  François Laisney,et al.  A Model of the Anchoring Effect in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up , 2006 .

[93]  Herrade Igersheim Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences , 2007 .

[94]  Claudia Keser,et al.  THEORIES OF BEHAVIOR IN PRINCIPAL-AGENT RELATIONSHIPS WITH HIDDEN ACTION , 2007 .