Bone Conduction Thresholds and Skull Vibration Measured on the Teeth during Stimulation at Different Sites on the Human Head

Vibratory auditory stimulation or bone conduction (BC) reaches the inner ear through both osseous and non-osseous structures of the head, but the contribution of the different pathways of BC is still unclear. In this study, BC thresholds in response to stimulation at several different locations including the eye were assessed, while the magnitudes of skull bone vibrations were measured on the front teeth in human subjects with either normal hearing on both sides or unilateral deafness with normal hearing on the other side. The BC thresholds with stimulation at the ipsilateral mastoid and ipsilateral temporal region were lower than the BC thresholds with stimulation at the other sites, as reported by previous works. The lower thresholds with stimulation at the ipsilateral mastoid and ipsilateral temporal region matched higher amplitudes of skull bone vibrations measured on the teeth, but only at frequencies below 1 kHz. With stimulation at the eye, the thresholds were significantly higher than those with stimulation at the bony sites in the frequency range of 0.25–4 kHz. While skull bone vibrations as measured on the teeth during stimulation at the eye were low for low frequencies, significant bone vibrations were measured at 3 and 4 kHz, indicating different pathways for BC for either the soft tissue or bony site stimulation. This finding contradicts a straightforward relationship between vibrations of the skull bones and BC hearing thresholds.

[1]  K. Brinkmann,et al.  Threshold of hearing by bone conduction. A contribution to international standardization. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  M. Botte,et al.  Complications in the use of the halo fixation device. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  A. Stuart,et al.  Effect of vibrator to head coupling force on the auditory brain stem response to bone conducted clicks in newborn infants. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[4]  U. Rosenhall,et al.  Acceleration levels at hearing threshold with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction. , 1985, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  F. N. Martin,et al.  Sound pressure in the external auditory canal during bone-conduction testing. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[6]  T. Cawthorne,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL ACOUSTICS , 1955 .

[7]  E. R. Nilo.  The relation of vibrator surface area and static application force to the vibrator-to-head coupling. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  J Tonndorf,et al.  Bone conduction. Studies in experimental animals. , 1966, Acta Oto-Laryngologica.

[9]  Saumil N Merchant,et al.  Clinical, Experimental, and Theoretical Investigations of the Effect of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence on Hearing Mechanisms , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  H. Sohmer,et al.  Bone Conduction Hearing on the Teeth of the Lower Jaw , 2002, Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology.

[11]  E W Collard,et al.  Bone-conduction thresholds of human teeth. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. Zee,et al.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. , 1998, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[13]  Haim Sohmer,et al.  Further evidence for a fluid pathway during bone conduction auditory stimulation , 2004, Hearing Research.

[14]  S. Stenfelt,et al.  Linearity of sound transmission through the human skull in vivo. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  S. Merchant,et al.  Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Presenting as Conductive Hearing Loss Without Vertigo , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  Igal Savion,et al.  Bone conduction experiments in humans – a fluid pathway from bone to ear , 2000, Hearing Research.

[17]  S. Dunlap,et al.  Human Skull Vibratory Patterns in Audiometric and Supersonic Ranges , 1988, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  F. N. Martin,et al.  Insert earphone depth and the occlusion effect. , 2000, American journal of audiology.

[19]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Transmission properties of bone conducted sound: measurements in cadaver heads. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Rudolf Probst,et al.  Incapacitating hypersensitivity to one’s own body sounds due to a dehiscence of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal. A case report , 2005, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck.

[21]  S. Bertoli,et al.  Transmission Pathways of Vibratory Stimulation as Measured by Subjective Thresholds and Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[22]  Haim Sohmer,et al.  Bone conduction experiments in animals – evidence for a non-osseous mechanism , 2000, Hearing Research.

[23]  R. Naunton,et al.  The Stability of the Occlusion Effect , 1963 .

[24]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  Zur Theorie des Hörens bei der Schallaufnahme durch Knochenleitung , 1932 .

[25]  S. Stenfelt,et al.  Sensitivity to bone-conducted sound: excitation of the mastoid vs the teeth. , 1999, Scandinavian audiology.

[26]  M. Nakaya,et al.  Recurrent hearing loss after myelography treated with epidural blood patch. , 2005, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[27]  J. Durrant,et al.  Observations on temporal aspects of bone-conduction clicks: real head measurements. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.