Multifocal electroretinogram: age-related changes for different luminance levels

Abstract.Background: Age-related changes in the first-order multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) responses were measured for two different luminance levels (200 and 700 cd.m–2). The relative contribution of optical and neural factors to senescent change in response was evaluated. Methods: Data were obtained from one eye of each of 71 normal phakic subjects, age 9–80 years. The mfERG responses were recorded with the 7" stimulus-refractor unit (EDI) and VERIS 4.3 using the following protocol: bipolar contact lens, 103 hexagons, consecutive stimulation with 200 and 700 cd.m–2, pupils ≥6 mm, amplification of 105, filter cut-offs at 10 and 300 Hz. Results: Age-correlated decreases in amplitude and response density and increases in P1 implicit time were found for both luminance levels. The mean response density (nV.deg–2) was higher for the 700 cd.m–2 stimulus, but the rate of change with age was not significantly different from that obtained with the 200 cd.m–2 stimulus. Implicit time was not significantly different for the two light levels, nor was the rate of change with age. The decrease in response density and the increase in implicit time with age were significant across all retinal regions, dividing the 50 deg stimulus into six concentric rings. Age-related change in response density was greatest for the central retina and decreased with increasing retinal eccentricity. Conclusion: Log mfERG response changes linearly as a function of age. Analyses of the effects of reduced ocular media transmission and increased stray light, along with ancillary data obtained from pseudophakes, imply that age-related changes in the mfERG are due to both optical and neural factors.

[1]  G. Keppel.  Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. , 1991 .

[2]  W. Verdon,et al.  Topography of the multifocal electroretinogram , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[3]  E Zrenner,et al.  Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  J. Werner,et al.  Senescence of the human cone photoreceptor pathways , 2000 .

[5]  B. Leupen,et al.  Design and analysis , 1997 .

[6]  M. Arai,et al.  Multifocal electroretinograms in normal subjects. , 1998, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  H. Peterson.  The normal B-potential in the single-flash clinical electroretinogram. A computer technique study of the influence of sex and age. , 1968, Acta ophthalmologica.

[8]  C. Curcio,et al.  Aging of the human photoreceptor mosaic: evidence for selective vulnerability of rods in central retina. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  J L Barbur,et al.  The effect of age on the light scattering characteristics of the eye , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[10]  E WOLF,et al.  Glare and age. , 1960, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Weleber.  The effect of age on human cone and rod ganzfeld electroretinograms. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  D. Birch,et al.  Standardized full-field electroretinography. Normal values and their variation with age. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  C. E. Wright,et al.  The influence of age on the electroretinogram and visual evoked potential , 1985, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[14]  G. R. Jackson,et al.  Aging-related changes in the multifocal electroretinogram. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  E. Switkes,et al.  Sites of age-related sensitivity loss in a short-wave cone pathway. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  J. Werner,et al.  Senescence of foveal and parafoveal cone sensitivities and their relations to macular pigment density. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  B. Brown,et al.  Contrast and luminance as parameters defining the output of the VERIS topographical ERG. , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[19]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Influence of age on the multifocal electroretinography , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[20]  W Seiple,et al.  A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[21]  T. J. T. P. van den Berg,et al.  The intraocular straylight function in 129 healthy volunteers; Dependence on angle, age and pigmentation , 1990, Vision Research.

[22]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) , 2003, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[23]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  The field topography of ERG components in man—I. The photopic luminance response , 1992, Vision Research.

[24]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Testing treatment by covariate interactions when treatment varies within subjects. , 1996 .

[25]  J. J. Vos,et al.  Spectral transmission of the human ocular media. , 1974, Vision research.

[26]  H. Gao,et al.  Aging of the human retina. Differential loss of neurons and retinal pigment epithelial cells. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  A. Korczyn,et al.  Sympathetic pupillary tone in old age. , 1976, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Decline of photopic multifocal electroretinogram responses with age is due primarily to preretinal optical factors. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.