Platform affordances and data practices: The value of dispute on Wikipedia

In this paper we introduce the device perspective as a methodological contribution to platform studies. Through an engagement with debates about the notion of affordances, which focus on the relation between the technical and the social, we put forward an approach to study the production of data within platforms by engaging with the material properties of platforms as well as their interpretation and deployment by various types of users. As a case in point, we study how the affordances of Wikipedia are deployed in the production of encyclopedic knowledge and how this can be used to study controversies. The analysis shows how Wikipedia affords unstable encyclopedic knowledge by having mechanisms in place that suggest the continuous (re)negotiation of existing knowledge. We furthermore showcase the use of our open-source software, Contropedia, which can be utilized to study knowledge production on Wikipedia.

[1]  Richard A. Rogers.  Digital Methods , 2013 .

[2]  John Law,et al.  THE SOCIAL LIFE OF METHODS: Devices , 2013 .

[3]  Anne Helmond,et al.  The web as platform: Data flows in social media , 2015 .

[4]  András Kornai,et al.  Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia , 2012, PloS one.

[5]  Brian Rappert,et al.  Technologies, Texts and Possibilities: , 2003 .

[6]  N. Wakeford,et al.  Introduction : a perpetual inventory , 2012 .

[7]  Celia Lury,et al.  Inventive methods : the happening of the social , 2012 .

[8]  Matthew Fuller,et al.  Behind the Blip: Essays on the Culture of Software , 2003 .

[9]  Denilson Barbosa,et al.  Identifying controversial articles in Wikipedia: a comparative study , 2012, WikiSym '12.

[10]  Mel Stanfill,et al.  The interface as discourse: The production of norms through web design , 2015, New Media Soc..

[11]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[12]  Gina Neff,et al.  Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory , 2015 .

[13]  Daniel Harries,et al.  Wisdom of the crowd , 2017 .

[14]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Measuring self-focus bias in community-maintained knowledge repositories , 2009, C&T.

[15]  Tarleton Gillespie,et al.  The politics of ‘platforms’ , 2010, New Media Soc..

[16]  Nick Montfort,et al.  Platform Studies: Frequently Questioned Answers , 2009 .

[17]  Mathieu O’Neil.  Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes , 2009 .

[18]  Erik Borra,et al.  National Web Studies: The Case of Iran Online , 2013 .

[19]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Us vs. Them: Understanding Social Dynamics in Wikipedia with Revert Graph Visualizations , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[20]  N. Tkacz.  Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness , 2014 .

[21]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia , 2007, CHI.

[22]  András Kornai,et al.  Characterization and prediction of Wikipedia edit wars , 2011 .

[23]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Omnipedia: bridging the wikipedia language gap , 2012, CHI.

[24]  R. Stuart Geiger,et al.  Bots, bespoke, code and the materiality of software platforms , 2014 .

[25]  T. Venturini.  Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory , 2010 .

[26]  John Sloan,et al.  Wisdom of the crowd , 2005, Nature.

[27]  C. Pentzold.  Fixing the floating gap: The online encyclopaedia Wikipedia as a global memory place , 2009 .

[28]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Visual Analysis of Controversy in User-Generated Encyclopedias∗ , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[29]  W. Buxton.  Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[30]  旺文社,et al.  Social Life , 2020, Early Islamic North Africa.

[31]  Matthew Fuller,et al.  Software Studies: a lexicon , 2008 .

[32]  José van Dijck,et al.  Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system , 2010, New Media Soc..

[33]  J. Seth,et al.  The social life. , 1895 .

[34]  Taina Bucher.  Programmed sociality: A software studies perspective on social networking sites , 2012 .

[35]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences- 2007 Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia , 2022 .

[36]  John Riedl,et al.  rv you're dumb: identifying discarded work in Wiki article history , 2009, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[37]  Joshua McVeigh-Schultz,et al.  Thinking of You: Vernacular Affordance in the Context of the Microsocial Relationship App, Couple , 2015 .

[38]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[39]  三嶋 博之.  The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[40]  Paolo Ciuccarelli,et al.  Societal Controversies in Wikipedia Articles , 2015, CHI.

[41]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[42]  James Mussell.  Raw Data is an Oxymoron , 2014 .

[43]  R. Shaw,et al.  Perceiving, Acting and Knowing : Toward an Ecological Psychology , 1978 .