Modeling Dynamic Electrical Resistance During Resistance Spot Welding

Dynamic electrical resistance during resistance spot welding has been quantitatively modeled and analyzed in this work. A determination of dynamic resistance is necessary for predicting the transport processes and monitoring the weld quality during resistance spot welding. In this study, dynamic resistance is obtained by taking the sum of temperature-dependent bulk resistance of the workpieces and contact resistances at the faying surface and electrode-workpiece interface within an effective area corresponding to the electrode tip where welding current primarily flows. A contact resistance is composed of constriction and film resistances, which are functions of hardness, temperature, electrode force, and surface conditions. The temperature is determined from the previous study in predicting unsteady, axisymmetric mass, momentum, heat, species transport, and magnetic field intensity with a mushy-zone phase change in workpieces, and temperature and magnetic fields in the electrodes of different geometries. The predicted nugget thickness and dynamic resistance versus time show quite good agreement with available experimental data. Excluding expulsion, the dynamic resistance curve can be divided into four stages. A rapid decrease of dynamic resistance in stage I is attributed to decreases in contact resistances at the faying surface and electrode-workpiece interface. In stage 2, the increase in dynamic resistance results from the primary increase of bulk resistance in the workpieces and an increase of the sum of contact resistances at the faying surface and electrode-workpiece interface. Dynamic resistance in stage 3 decreases, because increasing rate of bulk resistance in the workpieces and contact resistances decrease. In stage 4 the decrease of dynamic resistance is mainly due to the formation of the molten nugget at the faying surface. The molten nugget is found to occur in stage 4 rather than stage 2 or 3 as qualitatively proposed in the literature. The effects of different parameters on the dynamic resistance curve are also presented.

[1]  Thomas W. Eagar,et al.  Resistance spot welding of galvanized steel: Part II. Mechanisms of spot weld nugget formation , 1986 .

[2]  K. Cramer,et al.  Magnetofluid dynamics for engineers and applied physicists , 1973 .

[3]  Electrical conduction in solids , 1985 .

[4]  Frank P. Incropera,et al.  Numerical analysis of binary solid-liquid phase change using a continuum model , 1988 .

[5]  Sheri Sheppard,et al.  Electrical contact resistance under high loads and elevated temperatures , 1993 .

[6]  PengSheng Wei,et al.  Factors Affecting Nugget Growth With Mushy-Zone Phase Change During Resistance Spot Welding , 1991 .

[7]  H. Chandler,et al.  The effect of mechanical loading on the contact resistance of coated aluminium , 1997 .

[8]  H. E. Boyer,et al.  Metals handbook; desk edition , 1985 .

[9]  R. Holm.  Electric contacts; theory and application , 1967 .

[10]  F. Incropera,et al.  A continuum model for momentum, heat and species transport in binary solid-liquid phase change systems—I. Model formulation , 1987 .

[11]  L. F. Porter,et al.  Hardness of tempered martensite in carbon and low-alloy steels , 1977 .

[12]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Contact resistances in spot welding , 1996 .

[13]  S. Patankar.  Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[14]  PengSheng Wei,et al.  Axisymmetric Nugget Growth During Resistance Spot Welding , 1990 .

[15]  J. C. Papritan,et al.  Modeling of resistance spot weld nugget growth , 1992 .

[16]  PengSheng Wei,et al.  Transport Phenomena During Resistance Spot Welding , 1996 .

[17]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Electrical conduction in solids II. Theory of temperature-dependent conductors , 1958, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  Jamil A. Khan,et al.  Numerical Thermal Model of Resistance Spot Welding in Aluminum , 2000 .

[19]  M. Modest.  Radiative heat transfer , 1993 .

[20]  J. Evans,et al.  The effect of surface roughness, oxide film thickness and interfacial sliding on the electrical contact resistance of aluminium. , 1998 .

[21]  J. Greenwood.  Constriction resistance and the real area of contact , 1966 .