Assessing Internet energy intensity: A review of methods and results

Abstract Assessing the average energy intensity of Internet transmissions is a complex task that has been a controversial subject of discussion. Estimates published over the last decade diverge by up to four orders of magnitude — from 0.0064 kilowatt-hours per gigabyte (kWh/GB) to 136 kWh/GB. This article presents a review of the methodological approaches used so far in such assessments: i) top–down analyses based on estimates of the overall Internet energy consumption and the overall Internet traffic, whereby average energy intensity is calculated by dividing energy by traffic for a given period of time, ii) model-based approaches that model all components needed to sustain an amount of Internet traffic, and iii) bottom–up approaches based on case studies and generalization of the results. Our analysis of the existing studies shows that the large spread of results is mainly caused by two factors: a) the year of reference of the analysis, which has significant influence due to efficiency gains in electronic equipment, and b) whether end devices such as personal computers or servers are included within the system boundary or not. For an overall assessment of the energy needed to perform a specific task involving the Internet, it is necessary to account for the types of end devices needed for the task, while the energy needed for data transmission can be added based on a generic estimate of Internet energy intensity for a given year. Separating the Internet as a data transmission system from the end devices leads to more accurate models and to results that are more informative for decision makers, because end devices and the networking equipment of the Internet usually belong to different spheres of control.

[1]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  Impact of office productivity cloud computing on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Robert A. Kozak,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessments: The case of paper and digital media , 2014 .

[3]  B. Dhoedt,et al.  Worldwide energy needs for ICT: The rise of power-aware networking , 2008, 2008 2nd International Symposium on Advanced Networks and Telecommunication Systems.

[4]  Friedemann Mattern,et al.  ICT for Green – How Computers Can Help Us to Conserve Energy , 2010 .

[5]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability of electronic media: Strategies for life cycle inventory data collection and their implications for LCA results , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  D. Schien,et al.  Impact of location on the energy footprint of digital media , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST).

[7]  Eric Masanet,et al.  The Energy Efficiency Potential of Cloud-Based Software: A U.S. Case Study , 2014 .

[8]  Rolf Widmer,et al.  Insights from a decade of development cooperation in e-waste management , 2013 .

[9]  A. Vishwanath,et al.  Energy efficiency of optical IP protocol suites , 2012, OFC/NFOEC.

[10]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Sustainability and ICT - An overview of the field , 2011 .

[11]  Rodney S. Tucker,et al.  Green Cloud Computing: Balancing Energy in Processing, Storage, and Transport , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Bruce Nordman,et al.  Data network equipment energy use and savings potential in buildings , 2012 .

[13]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The Direct Energy Demand of Internet Data Flows , 2013 .

[14]  J. Koomey Estimating energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of Internet advertising , 2008 .

[15]  Christian Belady,et al.  GREEN GRID DATA CENTER POWER EFFICIENCY METRICS: PUE AND DCIE , 2008 .

[16]  C. Weber,et al.  The Energy and Climate Change Implications of Different Music Delivery Methods , 2010 .

[17]  Bruce Nordman,et al.  Network Electricity Use Associated with Wireless Personal Digital Assistants , 2004 .

[18]  Jayant Baliga,et al.  Energy Consumption in Access Networks , 2008, OFC/NFOEC 2008 - 2008 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[19]  Ampalavanapillai Nirmalathas,et al.  Methodologies for assessing the use-phase power consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of telecommunications network services. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  P Vetter,et al.  Power Trends in Communication Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[21]  R.S. Tucker,et al.  Energy Consumption of the Internet , 2007, COIN-ACOFT 2007 - Joint International Conference on the Optical Internet and the 32nd Australian Conference on Optical Fibre Technology.

[22]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Trends in Environmental Information Processing , 1994, IFIP Congress.

[24]  R.S. Tucker,et al.  Energy Consumption in Optical IP Networks , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[25]  THE POWER OF WIRELESS CLOUD An analysis of the impact on energy consumption of the growing popularity of accessing cloud services via wireless devices , .

[26]  Rodney S. Tucker,et al.  Power consumption and energy efficiency in the internet , 2011, IEEE Network.

[27]  Karen Ehrhardt-Martinez,et al.  Information and communication technologies: The power of productivity (Part II) , 2008 .

[28]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Effects of Internet-based multiple-site conferences on greenhouse gas emissions , 2012, Telematics Informatics.

[29]  John A. “Skip” Laitner Semiconductors and Information Technologies , 2010 .

[30]  L. Hilty,et al.  Scenario Analysis , 2010, Ten Laws of Operational Risk.