Active transonic aerofoil design optimization usingrobust multiobjective evolutionary algorithms

The use of adaptive wing/aerofoil designs is being considered, as they are promising techniques in aeronautic/ aerospace since they can reduce aircraft emissions and improve aerodynamic performance of manned or unmanned aircraft. This paper investigates the robust design and optimization for one type of adaptive techniques: active flow control bump at transonic flow conditions on a natural laminar flow aerofoil. The concept of using shock control bump is to control supersonic flow on the suction/pressure side of natural laminar flow aerofoil that leads to delaying shock occurrence (weakening its strength) or boundary layer separation. Such an active flow control technique reduces total drag at transonic speeds due to reduction of wave drag. The location of boundary-layer transition can influence the position and structure of the supersonic shock on the suction/pressure side of aerofoil. The boundarylayer transition position is considered as an uncertainty design parameter in aerodynamic design due to the many factors, such as surface contamination or surface erosion. This paper studies the shock-control-bump shape design optimization using robust evolutionary algorithms with uncertainty in boundary-layer transition locations. The optimization method is based on a canonical evolution strategy and incorporates the concepts of hierarchical topology, parallel computing, and asynchronous evaluation. The use of adaptive wing/aerofoil designs is being considered, as they are promising techniques in aeronautic/ aerospace since they can reduce aircraft emissions and improve aerodynamic performance of manned or unmanned aircraft. This paper investigates the robust design and optimization for one type of adaptive techniques: active flow control bump at transonic flow conditions on a natural laminar flow aerofoil. The concept of using shock control bump is to control supersonic flow on the suction/pressure side of natural laminar flow aerofoil that leads to delaying shock occurrence (weakening its strength) or boundary-layer separation. Such an active flow control technique reduces total drag at transonic speeds due to reduction of wave drag. The location of boundary-layer transition can influence the position and structure of the supersonic shock on the suction/pressure side of aerofoil. The boundarylayer transition position is considered as an uncertainty design parameter in aerodynamic design due to the many factors, such as surface contamination or surface erosion. This paper studies the shock-control-bump shape design optimization using robust evolutionary algorithms with uncertainty in boundary-layer transition locations. The optimization method is based on a canonical evolution strategy and incorporates the concepts of hierarchical topology, parallel computing, and asynchronous evaluation. Two test cases are conducted: the first test assumes the boundary-layer transition position is at 45% of chord from the leading edge, and the second test considers robust design optimization for the shock control bump at the variability of boundary-layer transition positions. The numerical result shows that the optimization method coupled to uncertainty design techniques produces Pareto optimal shock-control-bump shapes, which have low sensitivity and high aerodynamic performance while having significant total drag reduction.

[1]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  A combined experimental and numerical study of flow structures over three-dimensional shock control bumps , 2008 .

[2]  R. L. Iman,et al.  Latin hypercube sampling (program user's guide). [LHC, in FORTRAN] , 1980 .

[3]  N. Qin,et al.  Numerical study of active shock control for transonic aerodynamics , 2004 .

[4]  Gabriel Bugeda,et al.  Double Shock Control Bump design optimization using hybridised evolutionary algorithms , 2010, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Considerations in engineering parallel multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[6]  Andreas Zell,et al.  Median-Selection for Parallel Steady-State Evolution Strategies , 2000, PPSN.

[7]  Mourad Sefrioui,et al.  A Hierarchical Genetic Algorithm Using Multiple Models for Optimization , 2000, PPSN.

[8]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies , 2001, Evolutionary Computation.

[9]  N Qin,et al.  Three-dimensional contour bumps for transonic wing drag reduction , 2008 .

[10]  Luis F. Gonzalez,et al.  Robust design optimisation using multi-objectiveevolutionary algorithms , 2008 .

[11]  Luis F. Gonzalez,et al.  Evolutionary Optimisation Methods with Uncertainty for Modern Multidisciplinary Design in Aeronautical Engineering , 2009 .

[12]  Luis F. Gonzalez,et al.  Robust evolutionary algorithms for UAV/UCAV aerodynamic andRCS design optimisation , 2008 .

[13]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic Programming II , 1992 .

[14]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.