论文信息 - H-index, mentoring-index, highly-cited and highly-accessed: how to evaluate scientists?

H-index, mentoring-index, highly-cited and highly-accessed: how to evaluate scientists?

How best to evaluate scientists within a peer group is a difficult task. This editorial discusses the use of the H-index and total citations. It also raises the consideration of a mentoring-index and the value of understanding the frequency that a published paper is accessed by readers.

Kuan-Teh Jeang | K. Jeang

[1] A. Mouland,et al. The retrovirus RNA trafficking granule: from birth to maturity , 2006, Retrovirology.

[2] A. Marcello. Latency: the hidden HIV-1 challenge , 2006, Retrovirology.

[3] E. Freed,et al. The cell biology of HIV-1 and other retroviruses , 2006, Retrovirology.

[4] S. Landry,et al. HTLV-I antisense transcripts initiating in the 3'LTR are alternatively spliced and polyadenylated , 2006, Retrovirology.

[5] R. Weiss. The discovery of endogenous retroviruses , 2006, Retrovirology.

[6] Kamel Khalili,et al. Retrovirology BioMed Central Review HIV-1 associated dementia: symptoms and causes , 2006 .

[7] J. Hirsch. Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8] Vinod Scaria,et al. Host-virus interaction: a new role for microRNAs , 2006, Retrovirology.

[9] B. Palmer,et al. HIV-1 infection and CD4 T cell depletion in the humanized Rag2-/-γc-/- (RAG-hu) mouse model , 2006, Retrovirology.

[10] Kuan-Teh Jeang,et al. Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics? , 2007, Retrovirology.

[11] Janet Kleber,et al. Sometimes the impact factor outshines the H index , 2008, Retrovirology.

[12] Anne Saumet,et al. Anti-viral RNA silencing: do we look like plants ? , 2006, Retrovirology.