Modeling eco-friendly house purchasing intention: a combined study of PLS-SEM and fsQCA approaches

Purpose The urgency to address climate change and its devastating consequences has never been more pressing. As societies become increasingly aware of the detrimental impact of traditional housing on the planet, there is a growing demand for eco-friendly housing solutions that prioritize energy efficiency, resource conservation and reduced carbon emissions. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the factors that influence customers’ priority toward eco-friendly house purchasing intention. Design/methodology/approach This study collected 386 data using a quantitative research strategy and purposive sampling method. This study uses a hybrid analysis technique using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approaches to identify the influencing factors. Findings The PLS-SEM analysis found that attitude toward the eco-friendly house, subjective norms, performance expectancy, environmental knowledge and environmental sensitivity have a positive influence on eco-friendly house purchasing intention. However, perceived behavioral control and willingness to pay were found to have insignificant effect on customers’ intention to purchase eco-friendly houses. The fsQCA results further revealed complex causal relationships between the influencing factors. Practical implications This research will not only contribute to academic knowledge but also provide practical guidance to real estate developers, policymakers and individuals looking to make environmentally responsible choices. By understanding the factors that influence consumers’ intentions to purchase eco-friendly houses, we can pave the way for a more sustainable and resilient future. Originality/value This study has used a hybrid analysis technique, combining PLS-SEM and fsQCA, to enhance the predictive accuracy of eco-friendly house purchase intentions among individuals residing in densely populated and highly polluted developing countries, such as Bangladesh.

[1]  Ali Vafaei-Zadeh,et al.  Investigating factors influencing individual user's intention to adopt cloud computing: a hybrid approach using PLS-SEM and fsQCA , 2023, Kybernetes.

[2]  S. Isa,et al.  Factors influencing customers’ green purchasing intention: evidence from developing country , 2023, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.

[3]  Chieh-Yu Lin,et al.  Green Home Buying Intention of Malaysian Millennials: An Extension of Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2022, Buildings.

[4]  T. Ramayah,et al.  Cyber-entrepreneurial intention among students in Public Universities: evidence from an Emerging Country , 2022, Education and Information Technologies.

[5]  Ying Sun,et al.  Research on the influencing factors of consumers’ green purchase behavior in the post-pandemic era , 2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[6]  Abaid Ullah Zafar,et al.  Adoption of green innovation technology to accelerate sustainable development among manufacturing industry , 2022, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.

[7]  Kavita Sharma,et al.  Factors affecting green purchase behavior: A systematic literature review , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[8]  Jianguo Wang,et al.  Factors Affecting Green Purchase Intention: A Perspective of Ethical Decision Making , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  A. Raza,et al.  How anticipated pride and guilt influence green consumption in the Middle East: The moderating role of environmental consciousness , 2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[10]  Alrence S. Halibas,et al.  Exploring the antecedents of sustainable consumers' purchase intentions: Evidence from emerging countries , 2022, Sustainable Development.

[11]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance , 2022, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

[12]  S. Kurnia,et al.  Understanding the purchase intention of fitness wearables: using value-based adoption model , 2022, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration.

[13]  J. Seok,et al.  Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust , 2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[14]  Junghoon Lee,et al.  Psychological Benefits of Purchasing Home Meal Replacement in the Context of Eco-Friendly TV Home Shopping Broadcast: The Moderating Role of Personal Norm , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  W. H. Loo,et al.  Antecedents of green computer purchase behavior among Malaysian consumers from the perspective of rational choice and moral norm factors , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[16]  Saif-ur-Rehman,et al.  RETRACTED ARTICLE: Adoption of eco-friendly cars: mediated effects of attitude and moderation role of gender diversity across UAE market: application of extended version of theory of planned behaivour , 2022, Annals of Operations Research.

[17]  S. Sia,et al.  Theory of planned behavior in predicting the construction of eco-friendly houses , 2022, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

[18]  V. Prybutok,et al.  A green experience with eco-friendly cars: A young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model , 2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[19]  Hong Chen,et al.  Identifying what shapes the words and actions of residents' environmentally friendly express packaging: Evidence from a two-stage payment model. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Tariq Jalees,et al.  Psychological consumer behavior and sustainable green food purchase , 2022, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.

[21]  Shailender Singh,et al.  Pro-environmental purchase intention towards eco-friendly apparel: Augmenting the theory of planned behavior with perceived consumer effectiveness and environmental concern , 2022, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing.

[22]  G. Grolleau,et al.  Projection bias in environmental beliefs and behavioural intentions - An application to solar panels and eco-friendly transport , 2022, Energy Policy.

[23]  Rambabu Lavuri,et al.  Green factors stimulating the purchase intention of innovative luxury organic beauty products: Implications for sustainable development. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  A. Verma,et al.  Measuring and Modelling Electric Vehicle Adoption of Indian Consumers , 2021, Transportation in Developing Economies.

[25]  K. Nawaser,et al.  Understanding the determinants of e-wallet continuance usage intention in Malaysia , 2021, Quality & Quantity.

[26]  Ulla A. Saari,et al.  Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention , 2021 .

[27]  Shanyong Wang,et al.  “I buy green products for my benefits or yours”: understanding consumers' intention to purchase green products , 2021, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.

[28]  Mohammad Masukujjaman,et al.  Bridging Green Gaps: The Buying Intention of Energy Efficient Home Appliances and Moderation of Green Self-Identity , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[29]  S. M. Rasoolimanesh,et al.  Can tourist engagement enhance tourist behavioural intentions? A combination of PLS-SEM and fsQCA approaches , 2021, Tourism Recreation Research.

[30]  Thi Q. N. Ngo,et al.  Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and green purchase intention: an application of the extended theory of planned behavior , 2021 .

[31]  Williams Ackaah,et al.  Factors influencing consumers’ intentions to purchase electric vehicles in Ghana , 2021, Transportation Letters.

[32]  S. Jena,et al.  The transition from BS4 to BS6 compliant vehicles for eco-friendly mobility in India: An empirical study on switching intention , 2021, Research in Transportation Economics.

[33]  Sourabh Jain,et al.  What drives adoption intention of electric vehicles in India? An integrated UTAUT model with environmental concerns, perceived risk and government support , 2021, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[34]  S. Suwanmaneepong,et al.  Community enterprise consumers’ intention to purchase organic rice in Thailand: the moderating role of product traceability knowledge , 2021, British Food Journal.

[35]  Rambabu Lavuri.  Extending the theory of planned behavior: factors fostering millennials’ intention to purchase eco-sustainable products in an emerging market , 2021, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[36]  Ali Vafaei-Zadeh,et al.  Safety Technology Adoption: Predicting Intention to Use Car Dashcams in an Emerging Country , 2021, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management.

[37]  Anwar Sadat Shimul,et al.  Investigating Female Shoppers’ Attitude and Purchase Intention toward Green Cosmetics in South Africa , 2021, Journal of Global Marketing.

[38]  Mengdi Chen,et al.  Purchase intention for hydrogen automobile among Chinese citizens: The influence of environmental concern and perceived social value , 2021, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[39]  Xiaoli Zhao,et al.  Measuring purchase intention towards green power certificate in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior , 2021 .

[40]  David Martín-Consuegra,et al.  What influences consumers’ intention to purchase organic personal care products? The role of social reassurance , 2021 .

[41]  Sayed Kifayat Shah,et al.  Consumer's intention to purchase 5G: Do environmental awareness, environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter? , 2021 .

[42]  Feiyu Chen,et al.  How do environmental values impact green product purchase intention? The moderating role of green trust , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[43]  A. Ploeger,et al.  An integrated framework to explain consumers’ purchase intentions toward green food in the Chinese context , 2021 .

[44]  Edmund Goh,et al.  What a load of rubbish! The efficacy of theory of planned behaviour and norm activation model in predicting visitors’ binning behaviour in national parks , 2021 .

[45]  Liangliang Liu,et al.  Unearthing consumers’ intention to adopt eco-friendly smart home services: an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model , 2021, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[46]  Gupta Amit Kumar.  Framing a model for green buying behavior of Indian consumers: From the lenses of the theory of planned behavior , 2021 .

[47]  Yeong Huei Lee,et al.  Slag uses in making an ecofriendly and sustainable concrete: A review , 2021 .

[48]  Guozhu Mao,et al.  A comprehensive review on green buildings research: bibliometric analysis during 1998–2018 , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[49]  M. Amran,et al.  Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: A critical review of the long-term durability properties , 2021 .

[50]  Ruidong Chang,et al.  The impact of personality traits on household energy conservation behavioral intentions – An empirical study based on theory of planned behavior in Xi'an , 2021 .

[51]  Dharun Kasilingam,et al.  Understanding the adoption and willingness to pay for internet of things services , 2021 .

[52]  M. S. Rahman,et al.  Teenagers’ behavioural intention towards wearable technologies and intention to recommend others: an empirical study in Bangladesh , 2021 .

[53]  Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah,et al.  Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge , 2021 .

[54]  Nombulelo Dilotsotlhe.  Factors influencing the green purchase behaviour of millennials: An emerging country perspective , 2021, Cogent Business & Management.

[55]  M. Abrar,et al.  Understanding purchase intention towards eco-friendly clothing for generation Y & Z , 2021, Cogent Business & Management.

[56]  Rambabu Lavuri,et al.  Green Products: Factors Exploring the Green Purchasing Behavior of South Indian Shoppers , 2020, Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management.

[57]  C. Aigbavboa,et al.  Affordable housing issue: Experimental investigation on properties of eco-friendly lightweight concrete produced from incorporating periwinkle and palm kernel shells , 2020, Results in Engineering.

[58]  Heesup Han,et al.  Predicting consumer purchase intention toward hybrid vehicles: testing the moderating role of price sensitivity , 2020, European Business Review.

[59]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  Supply chain information integration and its impact on the operational performance of manufacturing firms in Malaysia , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[60]  Rawan Nimri,et al.  The determinants of consumers’ intention of purchasing green hotel accommodation: Extending the theory of planned behaviour , 2020 .

[61]  Tahir Islam,et al.  Relation of impulsive urges and sustainable purchase decisions in the personalized environment of social media , 2020 .

[62]  J. Paul,et al.  An innovation resistance theory perspective on purchase of eco-friendly cosmetics , 2020 .

[63]  A. Shakoor,et al.  Eco-friendly dredged material-cement bricks , 2020 .

[64]  Seyedali Ahrari,et al.  The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis , 2020 .

[65]  Jonghan Hyun,et al.  Consumer responses to trade-offs in eco-friendly clothing: The moderating effects of fashion leadership and regulatory focus , 2020 .

[66]  Qingyu Zhang,et al.  Green purchase intention: Effects of electronic service quality and customer green psychology , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[67]  F. Bação,et al.  What factors determining customer continuingly using food delivery apps during 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic period? , 2020, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[68]  Lei Wang.  Determinants of Consumers Purchase Attitude and Intention Toward Green Hotel Selection , 2020, Journal of China Tourism Research.

[69]  K. Zaman,et al.  Green Technology Acceptance Model and Green Logistics Operations: “To See Which Way the Wind Is Blowing” , 2020, Frontiers in Sustainability.

[70]  S. Chuanmin,et al.  Green purchase behavior towards green housing: an investigation of Bangladeshi consumers , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[71]  F. Pacho.  What influences consumers to purchase organic food in developing countries? , 2020 .

[72]  C. Khoo-Lattimore,et al.  Tourist engagement and loyalty: gender matters? , 2020 .

[73]  Hosein Naderpour,et al.  Estimating the compressive strength of eco-friendly concrete incorporating recycled coarse aggregate using neuro-fuzzy approach , 2020 .

[74]  J. J. McArthur,et al.  Health and wellness in commercial buildings: Systematic review of sustainable building rating systems and alignment with contemporary research , 2020 .

[75]  Rohit H. Trivedi,et al.  Self-identity and internal environmental locus of control: Comparing their influences on green purchase intentions in high-context versus low-context cultures , 2020, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[76]  J. Labrincha,et al.  Multifunctional cork – alkali-activated fly ash composites: A sustainable material to enhance buildings’ energy and acoustic performance , 2020 .

[77]  Pradeep Kautish,et al.  Determinants of pro‐environmental behavior and environmentally conscious consumer behavior: An empirical investigation from emerging market , 2019, BUSINESS STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT.

[78]  B. Foroughi,et al.  Knowledge leakage, an Achilles’ heel of knowledge sharing , 2019, Eurasian Business Review.

[79]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict , 2019, European Journal of Marketing.

[80]  N. Ahmad,et al.  Emanating the key factors of innovation performance: leveraging on the innovation culture among SMEs in Malaysia , 2019, Journal of Asia Business Studies.

[81]  Sadhna Shukla.  A Study on Millennial Purchase Intention of Green Products in India: Applying Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model , 2019, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business.

[82]  Muhammad Naeem.  Role of social networking platforms as tool for enhancing the service quality and purchase intention of customers in Islamic country , 2019, Journal of Islamic Marketing.

[83]  S. A. R. Khan,et al.  Do altruistic and egoistic values influence consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions towards eco-friendly packaged products? An empirical investigation , 2019, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[84]  Surendra Kumar Sia,et al.  Attitude and subjective norm as personal moral obligation mediated predictors of intention to build eco-friendly house , 2019, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

[85]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: a meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias , 2019, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[86]  M. Gannon,et al.  Does living in the vicinity of heritage tourism sites influence residents’ perceptions and attitudes? , 2019, Journal of Sustainable Tourism.

[87]  Jing Sun,et al.  Why U.S. Consumers Buy Sustainable Cotton Made Collegiate Apparel? A Study of the Key Determinants , 2019, Sustainability.

[88]  A. Uçar,et al.  Energy impact and eco-efficiency of the envelope insulation in residential buildings in Turkey , 2019, Applied Thermal Engineering.

[89]  Ji Hun Park,et al.  Latent heat storage biocomposites of phase change material-biochar as feasible eco-friendly building materials. , 2019, Environmental research.

[90]  S. Singh,et al.  Role of big data analytics in developing sustainable capabilities , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[91]  Sheranne Fairley,et al.  The role of place attachment and festival attachment in influencing attendees’ environmentally responsible behaviours at music festivals , 2018, Tourism Recreation Research.

[92]  Jing Wang,et al.  Policy implications for promoting the adoption of electric vehicles: Do consumer’s knowledge, perceived risk and financial incentive policy matter? , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[93]  A. Washizu,et al.  Acceptance of energy efficient homes in large Japanese cities: Understanding the inner process of home choice and residence satisfaction. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[94]  Parmeet Kaur,et al.  A survey of fault tolerance in cloud computing , 2018, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci..

[95]  Y. Goh,et al.  The role of psychological factors in influencing consumer purchase intention towards green residential building , 2018, International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis.

[96]  Florian Schuberth,et al.  PLS path modeling – a confirmatory approach to study tourism technology and tourist behavior , 2018, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology.

[97]  M. Law,et al.  Predicting Purchase Intention of Electric Vehicles in Hong Kong , 2018, Australasian Marketing Journal.

[98]  D. Petzer,et al.  Fostering Purchase Intentions Toward Online Retailer Websites in an Emerging Market: An S-O-R Perspective , 2018, Journal of Internet Commerce.

[99]  Richa Chaudhary.  Green buying behavior in India: an empirical analysis , 2018 .

[100]  Zezhou Wu,et al.  Investigating Young Consumers’ Purchasing Intention of Green Housing in China , 2018 .

[101]  R. Kant,et al.  Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers , 2018 .

[102]  Jia Liu,et al.  Understanding the Intention to Use Commercial Bike-sharing Systems: An Integration of TAM and TPB , 2018, HICSS.

[103]  Faizan Ali,et al.  An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in Hospitality Research , 2017 .

[104]  Yu Zhang,et al.  An integrated system of text mining technique and case-based reasoning (TM-CBR) for supporting green building design , 2017 .

[105]  Ke-Hai Yuan,et al.  Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[106]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations , 2017 .

[107]  Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin,et al.  Customer's purchase intention for a green home , 2017 .

[108]  Hossein Olya,et al.  Configurational Models to Predict Residents’ Support for Tourism Development , 2017 .

[109]  A. Griffa,et al.  Combining Litter Observations with a Regional Ocean Model to Identify Sources and Sinks of Floating Debris in a Semi-enclosed Basin: The Adriatic Sea , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[110]  R. Yadav,et al.  Determinants of Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2017 .

[111]  Eugene D. Hahn,et al.  From the editors: New directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business , 2017 .

[112]  Amos Darko,et al.  Drivers for green building : a review of empirical studies , 2017 .

[113]  Pramod Pathak,et al.  Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: A study on developing nation , 2017 .

[114]  J. Henseler.  Bridging Design and Behavioral Research With Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling , 2017 .

[115]  L. Löwemark,et al.  Distribution and quantity of microplastic on sandy beaches along the northern coast of Taiwan. , 2016, Marine pollution bulletin.

[116]  Jan Dul,et al.  Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA , 2016 .

[117]  A. Candrea,et al.  Developing ecotourism destinations in Romania. A case study approach , 2015 .

[118]  Yanan Sun,et al.  Research on the Influence Factors of the Service Satisfaction in University Campuses in China: A Review , 2015 .

[119]  N. Kock.  Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach , 2015, Int. J. e Collab..

[120]  Chi-Yo Huang,et al.  UTAUT2 Based Predictions of Factors Influencing the Technology Acceptance of Phablets by DNP , 2015 .

[121]  Joseph G. Allen,et al.  Green Buildings and Health , 2015, Current Environmental Health Reports.

[122]  Ned Kock,et al.  Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[123]  G. Overbeek,et al.  The theory of planned behavior: precursors of marijuana use in early adolescence? , 2012, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[124]  Marco Salvi,et al.  What drives “green housing” construction? Evidence from Switzerland , 2011 .

[125]  Chi Kwan Chau,et al.  A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes , 2010 .

[126]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms , 2009 .

[127]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[128]  Md. Abdul Moktadir,et al.  Guest Editorial , 2009, Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications.

[129]  I. Vermeir,et al.  Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap , 2006 .

[130]  L. Manzo,et al.  For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning , 2005 .

[131]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Theory-based Behavior Change Interventions: Comments on Hobbis and Sutton , 2005, Journal of health psychology.

[132]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[133]  G. Fryxell,et al.  The Influence of Environmental Knowledge and Values on Managerial Behaviours on Behalf of the Environment: An Empirical Examination of Managers in China , 2003 .

[134]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[135]  P. Ellen,et al.  The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally Conscious Behaviors , 1991 .

[136]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[137]  F. Santini,et al.  Sustainable technologies adoption research: A weight and meta-analysis , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[138]  Alok Tewari,et al.  Examining the role of receptivity to green communication, altruism and openness to change on young consumers’ intention to purchase green apparel: A multi-analytical approach , 2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[139]  Theresa Maria Rausch,et al.  Bridge the gap: Consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[140]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Does environmentally responsible purchase intention matter for consumers? A predictive sustainable model developed through an empirical study , 2021 .

[141]  Chiara Passoni,et al.  Redefining the concept of sustainable renovation of buildings: State of the art and an LCT-based design framework , 2021 .

[142]  Peng Liu,et al.  Promoting green residential buildings: Residents' environmental attitude, subjective knowledge, and social trust matter , 2018 .

[143]  B. Tan.  The Roles of Knowledge, Threat, and PCE on Green Purchase Behaviour , 2011 .

[144]  Franz Fuerst,et al.  Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Effects of Environmental Certification on Office Values , 2011 .

[145]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) As an Approach , 2009 .

[146]  J. Last.  Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[147]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .