A novel problem for the likelihood-based semantics of even

This paper describes and examines novel data which is problematic for the popular view that the scale in the scalar presupposition of even is based on comparative (un)likelihood or probability. Several theories in the past attacked this characterization of the scale by pointing out examples where even is felicitous although the likelihood-based presupposition does not seem to be met, indicating that the comparative unlikelihood of p is not a necessary condition for a felicitous use of even p . In contrast to these theories, this paper examines novel data where even is in felicitous although the likelihood-based presupposition is met, indicating that the comparative unlikelihood of p is not a sufficient condition for a felicitous use of even p . In particular, I look at the unexpected infelicity of even p in the context of a salient p or q alternative. I examine, and reject, several potential objections to the claim that such sentences pose a problem for the likelihood-based approach to even and conclude that the novel data constitute a real challenge for this popular approach to even . http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.9.2 BibTeX info

[1]  D. Fox Free Choice and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures , 2007 .

[2]  R. Francescotti Even: The conventional implicature approach reconsidered , 1995 .

[3]  Elena Guerzoni,et al.  Even-NPIs in YES/NO Questions , 2004 .

[4]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Additive Particles under Stress , 1998 .

[5]  Hotze Rullmann,et al.  Even, Polarity, and Scope , 1997 .

[6]  A. Kratzer The Notional Category of Modality , 2008 .

[7]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  The landscape of EVEN , 2007 .

[8]  T. Zimmermann Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility , 2000 .

[9]  Laurence R. Horn From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening , 2000 .

[10]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .

[11]  Karina Wilkinson The scope of even , 1996 .

[12]  Mats Rooth A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[13]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention , 2013 .

[14]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[15]  Daniel Büring,et al.  On D-Trees, Beans, And B-Accents , 2003 .

[16]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Absolute and Relative Scalar Particles in Spanish and Hindi , 2000 .

[17]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences , 2004 .

[18]  A. Kratzer An investigation of the lumps of thought , 1989 .

[19]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[20]  Utpal Lahiri Focus and Negative Polarity in Hindi , 1998 .

[21]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle,et al.  Disjunction in Alternative Semantics , 2010 .

[22]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle Innocent exclusion in an Alternative Semantics , 2008 .

[23]  K. Nakanishi Even, only, and Negative Polarity in Japanese , 2006 .

[24]  B. Geurts Entertaining Alternatives: Disjunctions as Modals , 2005 .

[25]  D. Fox,et al.  On the characterization of alternatives , 2011 .