Causal path modeling: what it does and what it does not tell us

This paper attempts to demystify the technique of causal path modeling for the non‐specialists by presenting aspects of its value for social science and management research and by illustrating common misunderstandings about its attributes. Special emphasis is placed on the real world validity of causal relationships depicted in causal path models and on the information that the data‐fitting properties of causal path models provide regarding this issue. Causal path models that are based on research in antecedents of career success are used to illustrate the points that are made. It is stressed that the validity of causal relationships depicted in causal path models is subject to exactly the same methodological restrictions as the validity of causality claims that are made without the use of causal path modeling; and that the purpose of using quantitative techniques in causal path modeling is not to improve certainty on causality direction.

[1]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[2]  David A. Specht,et al.  On the evaluation of causal models , 1975 .

[3]  M. Poole,et al.  Contrasting subjective and objective criteria as determinants of perceived career success: A longitudinal study , 1993 .

[4]  Urs E. Gattiker,et al.  Predictors for Managers' Career Mobility, Success, and Satisfaction , 1988 .

[5]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  A Social Capital Theory of Career Success , 2001 .

[6]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[7]  G. Nabi An investigation into the differential profile of predictors of objective and subjective career success , 1999 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  J. Davis The Logic Of Causal Order , 1987 .

[10]  R. Depue,et al.  Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling , 2000 .

[12]  G. Vaillant,et al.  The Big Five Personality Traits and the Life Course: A 45-Year Longitudinal Study , 1999 .

[13]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[14]  David A. Specht,et al.  COMPARING CAUSAL MODELS , 1976 .

[15]  C. A. Higgins,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, AND CAREER SUCCESS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN , 1999 .

[16]  S. Wright The Method of Path Coefficients , 1934 .

[17]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[18]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and Causation , 1937, Wilmott.

[19]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PREDICTORS OF EXECUTIVE CAREER SUCCESS , 1995 .

[20]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[21]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices , 1974 .

[22]  Tenko Raykov,et al.  On Sensitivity of Structural Equation Modeling to Latent Relation Misspecifications , 2000 .

[23]  D. Kaplan Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions , 2000 .

[24]  H. Asher Causal modeling , 1976 .

[25]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[26]  P. Vernon,et al.  Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[27]  N. Bozionelos INTRA‐ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK RESOURCES: RELATION TO CAREER SUCCESS AND PERSONALITY , 2003 .

[28]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[29]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[30]  Urs E. Gattiker,et al.  Subjective career success: A study of managers and support personnel , 1986 .