A UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)-approved operations manual for safe deployment of lightweight drones in research

ABSTRACT The academic literature of late is rich with examples of lightweight drones being used to capture data to support scientific research. Drone science is a blossoming field, but alongside a long-standing public concern about drone safety, the research community and our collaborators are increasingly calling for a ‘code of best practice’ for researchers who fly drones (no matter how small). Researchers who have long enjoyed the freedom of operating separately from ‘hobbyist’ and ‘commercial’ operators are now finding that their institutions and collaborators are demanding evidence of operational competence. In the UK, such competence can be formally accredited by obtaining a UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) ‘permission for aerial work’ (PfAW). Part of this process requires that the operators produce an ‘operations manual’ (OM) – a lengthy document explaining protocols for safe drone deployment, alongside maintenance and flight records. This article provides the frontispiece to an OM produced as part of a successful PfAW accreditation process. We share our OM, which is available as supplemental material to this article, in the spirit of research as a collaborative endeavour, with the aim that it will assist others facing the same stringent checks as ourselves, whilst also serving as a guide to safe flying that can be adapted and adopted by others.

[1]  Richard E. Brazier,et al.  Water resource management at catchment scales using lightweight UAVs: current capabilities and future perspectives , 2016 .

[2]  Jürgen Schmidt,et al.  Small-Scale Surface Reconstruction and Volume Calculation of Soil Erosion in Complex Moroccan Gully Morphology Using Structure from Motion , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[3]  C. Sandbrook.  The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation , 2015, Ambio.

[4]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[5]  J. Ryan,et al.  Repeat UAV photogrammetry to assess calving front dynamics at a large outlet glacier draining the Greenland Ice Sheet , 2014 .

[6]  Alan Hobbs,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2010 .

[7]  Stephan Getzin,et al.  Assessing biodiversity in forests using very high‐resolution images and unmanned aerial vehicles , 2012 .

[8]  P. Pomeroy,et al.  Assessing use of and reaction to unmanned aerial systems in gray and harbor seals during breeding and molt in the UK , 2015 .

[9]  Marc Olano,et al.  Optimal Altitude, Overlap, and Weather Conditions for Computer Vision UAV Estimates of Forest Structure , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[10]  S. Hancock,et al.  A Grassroots Remote Sensing Toolkit Using Live Coding, Smartphones, Kites and Lightweight Drones , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  Richard E. Brazier,et al.  Aerial photography collected with a multirotor drone reveals impact of Eurasian beaver reintroduction on ecosystem structure1 , 2015 .

[12]  F. Visser,et al.  Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[13]  A. Hodgson,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Surveying Marine Fauna: A Dugong Case Study , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Irene Marzolff,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Monitoring Soil Erosion in Morocco , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[15]  J. Ryan,et al.  UAV photogrammetry and structure from motion to assess calving dynamics at Store Glacier, a large outlet draining the Greenland ice sheet , 2015 .

[16]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2009 .

[17]  Aníbal Ollero,et al.  Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) An Unmanned Aircraft System for Automatic Forest Fire Monitoring and Measurement , 2022 .

[18]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Best practice for minimising unmanned aerial vehicle disturbance to wildlife in biological field research , 2016, Current Biology.

[19]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[20]  Amy Woodget,et al.  The Accuracy and Reliability of Traditional Surface Flow Type Mapping: Is it Time for a New Method of Characterizing Physical River Habitat? , 2016 .

[21]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[22]  Paul G. McDonald,et al.  Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition , 2016, PeerJ.

[23]  R. Brazier,et al.  Eurasian beaver activity increases water storage, attenuates flow and mitigates diffuse pollution from intensively-managed grasslands. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Patrice E. Carbonneau,et al.  Cost‐effective non‐metric photogrammetry from consumer‐grade sUAS: implications for direct georeferencing of structure from motion photogrammetry , 2017 .