An exploratory study of blending the virtual world and the laboratory experience in secondary chemistry classrooms

Abstract Research suggests that serious educational games may support learning of microscopic phenomena by making the invisible visible. The current study presents a novel instructional approach that blends a traditional lab experience with a serious educational game (SEG) to engage students with the hands-on laboratory experience while examining the molecular level mechanisms that cause the phenomena. We conducted a mixed methods study to examine teacher use of the blended reality environment (BRE) that utilizes a real-time data capture system and the learning gains associated with use of the BRE with chemistry students (n = 578) in a public high school in the southeast. The results demonstrate that students who experienced the blended reality environment (a) experienced significantly higher learning gains than students who experienced the business as usual (BAU) condition and (b) improved on specific scientific practices outlined in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) by practicing science skills in an authentic environment as scientists do. Analysis also reveals the explanatory power of examining student interaction within the BRE. Thematic analysis of teacher interviews identified three strengths of the BRE environment: (a) a coherent explanation of scientific phenomena, (2) an authentic science inquiry, and (3) a connection between the student and teacher within the learning environment.

[1]  D. Ezzy Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation , 2002 .

[2]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[3]  Amy Pallant,et al.  The Molecular Workbench Software: An Innovative Dynamic Modeling Tool for Nanoscience Education , 2011 .

[4]  Fred Percival,et al.  A Handbook of Game Design , 1982 .

[5]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality , 2008 .

[6]  S. Simpkins,et al.  Parental support and high school students' motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among latino and caucasian boys and girls , 2015 .

[7]  Tim Marsh,et al.  Serious games continuum: Between games for purpose and experiential environments for purpose , 2011, Entertain. Comput..

[8]  M. Barr Video Games and Learning , 2019, Graduate Skills and Game-Based Learning.

[9]  Piotr Jagodziński,et al.  Assessment of Application Technology of Natural User Interfaces in the Creation of a Virtual Chemical Laboratory , 2015 .

[10]  Onno De Jong,et al.  Problems in Teaching the Topic of Redox Reactions: Actions and Conceptions of Chemistry Teachers , 1995 .

[11]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[12]  Thomas M. Connolly,et al.  The role of psychology in understanding the impact of computer games , 2011, Entertain. Comput..

[13]  Stephen J. Hawkes,et al.  Chemistry Is Not a Laboratory Science , 2004 .

[14]  Gregory K. W. K. Chung Guidelines for the Design and Implementation of Game Telemetry for Serious Games Analytics , 2015 .

[15]  Craig W. Bowen Item Design Considerations for Computer-Based Testing of Student Learning in Chemistry , 1998 .

[16]  James M. Boyle,et al.  A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Sean C. Duncan,et al.  Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[18]  David Nicol,et al.  Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers , 1994 .

[19]  C. Kinzer,et al.  Foundations of Game-Based Learning , 2015 .

[20]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Games, Learning, and Assessment , 2012 .

[21]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment , 2000 .

[22]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Development and Validation of a Learning Analytics Framework: Two Case Studies Using Support Vector Machines , 2014, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

[23]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Serious Games Analytics: Theoretical Framework , 2015 .

[24]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Digital game-based learning , 2000, CIE.

[25]  Nabila Bousbia,et al.  Which Contribution Does EDM Provide to Computer-Based Learning Environments? , 2014 .

[26]  Clark C. Abt,et al.  Serious games , 2016, Springer International Publishing.

[27]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[28]  A. Afonso,et al.  Prospective physical sciences teachers' use of laboratory activities: an analysis of its evolution due to a science teaching methods course. , 2002 .

[29]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science , 2006, Science.

[30]  R. A. R. A. U. Ritterfeld Classifying Serious Games , 2009 .

[31]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: Applications to Constructionist Research , 2014, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

[32]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptually-integrated digital game: Comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the United States , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Mindy Levine,et al.  Addressing the STEM Gender Gap by Designing and Implementing an Educational Outreach Chemistry Camp for Middle School Girls , 2015 .