Validity and reliability of Tamil version of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire self-report.

BACKGROUND Child and adolescent mental health services are scarce in Sri Lanka. Moreover there are no validated instruments to measure the mental health problems of Tamil speaking adolescents in Sri Lanka. Hence, strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) self-report was translated into Tamil and validated in the District of Jaffna, Sri Lanka. SDQ self-report was translated from English to Tamil using standard translation and back translation method. The Tamil version of the SDQ self-report was validated against a gold standard (ie. diagnosis made by a consultant psychiatrist). Both clinic and community samples were included in the validation study. Thirty-five adolescents (11-16 years) attending a psychiatric clinic and 91 adolescents from the community were included. The consultant psychiatrist made the diagnosis independent of the SDQ responses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to measure the validity of SDQ. Reliability was measured using internal consistency. RESULTS The ROC curve indicated high validity for the identification of adolescents with mental health problems: area under the curve 0.87 (95% - CI = 0.79-0.93). International cut-off point of 15 gave a sensitivity of 69.4% and specificity of 92.2%. Cronbach's alpha values (0.67-0.78) were good in all subscales and total difficulties scale. CONCLUSION The SDQ self-report Tamil version can be used effectively for screening of adolescents to identify mental health problems as well as for research purposes.

[1]  D. Koretz,et al.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: U.S. normative data and psychometric properties. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[2]  P. Muris,et al.  The self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: its psychometric properties in 8- to 13-year-old non-clinical children. , 2004, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[3]  R. Goodman,et al.  Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) , 2003, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[4]  A. Rydell,et al.  Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe) , 2003, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[5]  H Meltzer,et al.  Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample , 2003, International review of psychiatry.

[6]  R. Goodman,et al.  Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[7]  M. Rutter.  Psychosocial influences: Critiques, findings, and research needs , 2000, Development and Psychopathology.

[8]  R. Goodman,et al.  Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka , 2000, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[9]  Athula Sumathipala,et al.  New approach to translating instruments for cross‐cultural research: a combined qualitative and quantitative approach for translation and consensus generation , 2000 .

[10]  R. Goodman.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. , 1997, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[11]  C. Capron,et al.  The use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Southern European countries , 2004, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[12]  T. Banaschewski,et al.  Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample , 2004, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[13]  P. Muris,et al.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)--further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. , 2003, European child & adolescent psychiatry.

[14]  D. Somasundaram,et al.  Psychosocial Consequences of War , 2002 .

[15]  D. Somasundaram.  Child soldiers: understanding the context. , 2002, BMJ.