Empirical Ground-Motion Attenuation Relations for the Eastern Alps in the Magnitude Range 2.5–6.3

In this paper we use a large data set of seismometric and accelerometric recordings (3168 vertical and 1402 for each of the horizontal components) collected by various networks in the eastern Alps to estimate empirical ground-motion attenuation relations valid in the magnitude range 2.5–6.3 for distances of up to 130 km. Relations are developed for horizontal and vertical peak ground acceleration and velocity, Arias intensity, response spectral acceleration, and Fourier amplitude for 46 periods between 0.1 and 2 sec. We adopt a simple magnitude-dependent attenuation model predicting closer attenuation curves and decreasing distance attenuation for increasing magnitude. We use truncated regression analysis to deal with the problem of non-triggering stations; with respect to other approaches, our solution does not require any discarding of data or the knowledge of which stations did not trigger. Our relations agree with others suitable for the study region for magnitudes greater than 5.8, while they have a faster attenuation for lower magnitudes. In an attempt to reduce the standard deviation, we have introduced soil classification into the relation, as well as a characterization of sites by means of H/V ratios. These ratios were estimated either by earthquakes (receiver function) or by the background seismic noise (Nakamura’s ratios). Similar to findings in other studies, the improvement obtained with soil classification is negligible, while H/V ratios reduce the standard deviation by up to 22%. Finally, we have investigated the implications of these new relations for seismic hazard assessment considering two sites of interest located in northeastern Italy (Udine and Gemona). In both cases, the difference in the hazard estimates for return periods shorter than 100 years is notable with respect to all other available relations.

[1]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[2]  P. Bragato Regression Analysis with Truncated Samples and Its Application to Ground-Motion Attenuation Studies , 2004 .

[3]  C. Doglioni,et al.  Seismotectonics of the eastern Southern Alps: a review , 1989 .

[4]  C. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[5]  George W. Housner,et al.  Spectrum Intensities of Strong-Motion Earthquakes , 1952 .

[6]  K. L. McLaughlin Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Strong-Motion Attenuation Relationships , 1991 .

[7]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Strong Motion Attenuation Relations: A Ten-Year Perspective , 1985 .

[8]  F. Cucchi,et al.  Soil type dependent spectral seismic hazard in Friuli-Venezia Giulia (NE Italy) , 2001 .

[9]  John G. Anderson Expected Shape of Regressions for Ground-Motion Parameters on Rock , 2000 .

[10]  L. Reiter Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights , 1991 .

[11]  John G. Anderson,et al.  Potential for Improving Ground-Motion Relations in Southern California by Incorporating Various Site Parameters , 2000 .

[12]  David M. Boore,et al.  Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[13]  Y Nakamura,et al.  A METHOD FOR DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATION OF SUBSURFACE USING MICROTREMOR ON THE GROUND SURFACE , 1989 .

[14]  David M. Perkins,et al.  SEISRISK III; a computer program for seismic hazard estimation , 1987 .

[15]  Antonio Pugliese,et al.  Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from italian strong-motion records , 1987 .

[16]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Magnitude-dependent variance of peak ground acceleration , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  J. Douglas Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates , 2003 .

[19]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  The dependence of peak horizontal acceleration on magnitude, distance, and site effects for small-magnitude earthquakes in California and Eastern North America , 1989 .

[20]  C. Chiaruttini,et al.  The correlation of peak ground horizontal acceleration with magnitude, distance, and seismic intensity for Friuli and Ancona, Italy, and the Alpide Belt , 1981 .

[21]  D. Perkins,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of peak-acceleration attenuation using a finite-fault uniform-patch model including isochrone and extremal characteristics , 1996 .

[22]  John Douglas,et al.  How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be , 2001 .

[23]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Digital calculation of response spectra from strong-motion earthquake records , 1969 .

[24]  A. Cohen Truncated and Censored Samples: Theory and Applications , 1991 .

[25]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra , 1997 .

[26]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .