Postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenator: No longer a bridge to no where?

BACKGROUND Postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (PC-ECMO) represents a unique subset of critically ill patients, with a paucity of data regarding long-term survival and correlated characteristics. We present a retrospective cohort of PC-ECMO patients, with outcomes at 1 and 3 years. METHODS Data were collected retrospectively for all patients requiring ECMO within 72 hours of an index cardiac operation (excluding assist devices and transplants). Primary outcomes were the ability to wean from ECMO, hospital survival, and long-term survival. RESULTS Thirty-one patients required PC-ECMO, representing a total of 172 days of ECMO support. Overall survival data were the ability to wean 58%, hospital survival 52%, 1-month survival 42%. The estimated 12- and 36-month survival for all PC-ECMO patients was 35% and 29%, respectively. Twelve and 36-month survival for all hospital survivors was 62% and 56%. Operative times, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores, type of operation, open chest status, hemorrhage, and cannulation location, and timing were all compared. Centrally cannulated patients were more likely to wean from ECMO (83% vs 44%; P = .03), and survive hospitalization (75% vs 36%; P = .04) and trended toward long-term survival benefit (67% vs 33%; P = .06). Otherwise, no statistically significant relationships were observed. CONCLUSIONS Central cannulation may provide benefits in the postcardiotomy patient, compared to peripheral strategies. Twelve and 36-month survival for all PC-ECMO patients was 35% and 29%. For hospital survivors, 12 and 36-month survival 62% 56% at 36. These data support PC-ECMO as a reasonable salvage strategy, with midterm survival comparable to other surgically treated diseases.

[1]  E. Natour,et al.  In-hospital outcome of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients: the 2007-2017 Maastricht experience. , 2017, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.

[2]  J. Verhoye,et al.  Clinical outcomes in patients after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a single-centre experience of 92 cases. , 2017, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[3]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  World-wide, mortality is a high risk soon after initiation of hemodialysis , 2013, Kidney international.

[4]  U. Maggiore,et al.  Survival in patients treated by long-term dialysis compared with the general population. , 2012, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[5]  M. Pasque,et al.  Mechanical support for isolated right ventricular failure in patients after cardiotomy. , 2004, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[6]  N. Doll,et al.  Temporary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Refractory Postoperative Cardiogenic Shock—A Single Center Experience , 2003, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[7]  R. Bellomo,et al.  An extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-based approach to cardiogenic shock in an older population. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  A. Alaiti,et al.  Simultaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Percutaneous Left Ventricular Decompression Therapy with Impella Is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock , 2019, ASAIO journal.

[9]  B. Kiaii,et al.  Five-year results of 219 consecutive patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postoperative cardiogenic shock. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.