A Hierarchical Unsupervised Spectral Clustering Scheme for Detection of Prostate Cancer from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) along with MRI has emerged as a promising tool in diagnosis and potentially screening for prostate cancer. Surprisingly little work, however, has been done in the area of automated quantitative analysis of MRS data for identifying likely cancerous areas in the prostate. In this paper we present a novel approach that integrates a manifold learning scheme (spectral clustering) with an unsupervised hierarchical clustering algorithm to identify spectra corresponding to cancer on prostate MRS. Ground truth location for cancer on prostate was determined from the sextant location and maximum size of cancer available from the ACRIN database, from where a total of 14 MRS studies were obtained. The high dimensional information in the MR spectra is non linearly transformed to a low dimensional embedding space and via repeated clustering of the voxels in this space, non informative spectra are eliminated and only informative spectra retained. Our scheme successfully identified MRS cancer voxels with sensitivity of 77.8%, false positive rate of 28.92%, and false negative rate of 20.88% on a total of 14 prostate MRS studies. Qualitative results seem to suggest that our method has higher specificity compared to a popular scheme, z-score, routinely used for analysis of MRS data.

[1]  Jianbo Shi,et al.  Graph Embedding to Improve Supervised Classification and Novel Class Detection: Application to Prostate Cancer , 2005, MICCAI.

[2]  W. Catalona,et al.  Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Arend Heerschap,et al.  Combination of feature‐reduced MR spectroscopic and MR imaging data for improved brain tumor classification , 2005, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2005, 8th International Conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA, October 26-29, 2005, Proceedings, Part I , 2005, MICCAI.

[5]  Zengqi Sun,et al.  MRS classification based on independent component analysis and support vector machines , 2005, Fifth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS'05).

[6]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  George Lee,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Classifying Gene and Protein Expression Datasets , 2007, ISBRA.

[8]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[9]  John Kurhanewicz,et al.  Quantification of prostate MRSI data by model‐based time domain fitting and frequency domain analysis , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  D. Vigneron,et al.  An automated technique for the quantitative assessment of 3D‐MRSI data from patients with glioma , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  P. Carroll,et al.  Proton HR‐MAS spectroscopy and quantitative pathologic analysis of MRI/3D‐MRSI‐targeted postsurgical prostate tissues , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.