Intraindividual Completion Time Modulates the Prediction Error Negativity in a Virtual 3-D Object Selection Task

A prediction error negativity (PEN) can be observed in the human electroencephalogram when there is a mismatch between the predicted and the perceived changes in the environment. Our previous study using a virtual object selection task demonstrated an impact of the level of avatar realism on the PEN, reflecting a mismatch between visual and proprioceptive feedback about the object selection. To investigate the role of temporal integration of different sensory information on the PEN, this article investigated the impact of task completion times on the PEN amplitude, using the same virtual object selection task. Trials from each participant were divided into slow trials and fast trials based on the task completion time, and their associated PEN amplitudes were separately aggregated and analyzed. The result shows that PEN amplitudes are significantly more pronounced in slow trials than in fast trials. This finding suggests that task completion times modulate the PEN amplitude—a long task completion time allowed for a better integration of information from both visual and proprioceptive systems as the basis to detect a mismatch between the expected hand trajectory during a reaching motion and the perceived visual feedback in the virtual environment.

[1]  Neil Salkind,et al.  Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and Understanding Data with Disk , 1997 .

[2]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  C Alain,et al.  Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[5]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[7]  Adrian G. Fischer,et al.  Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  E. Halgren,et al.  Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[11]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Structure Learning in Bayesian Sensorimotor Integration , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Li-Wei Ko,et al.  Visual Appearance Modulates Prediction Error in Virtual Reality , 2018, IEEE Access.

[13]  B. Kopp,et al.  N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brain , 2006, Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of errors in reaction tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[16]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[17]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[18]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[19]  A. Buchner,et al.  The Level of Reaction Time Determines the ERP Correlates of Auditory Negative Priming , 2006 .

[20]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data , 1995, NIPS.

[21]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Error-Related EEG Potentials Generated During Simulated Brain–Computer Interaction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Hierarchical error processing: Different errors, different systems , 2007, Brain Research.