USING THE FUZZY HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR SELECTING WASTEWATER FACILITIES AT PREFECTURE LEVEL

Although decision makers involved in environmental management issues usually agree on the necessity of interventions, conflicts emerge when interventions are specified and touch upon citizens’ reality in their local societies. In this context, a rationalization of the decision-making process is clearly needed in order to deal with conflicting objectives and divergent interests. We propose a multicriteria approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for selecting wastewater facilities at prefecture level. On the one hand we take for granted that there is consensus on the structure of hierarchy, i.e. the treatment processes and the criteria used for their evaluation. Evaluation of alternative treatment processes is performed with respect to the number, size, treatment method, and facilities location, and the evaluation criteria are based on the land planning, the environmental and techno-economic considerations, such as construction and operating costs. On the other hand, we propose the fuzzy extension of AHP for dealing with the vagueness of decision makers’ judgments. Since decision makers are not normally able to provide a quantitative evaluation of the alternatives but only a qualitative one, the pairwise comparisons are expressed in fuzzy terms. We use this method in a case study, we discuss its application in real world situations, and we conclude that this approach is a viable evaluation device and a good communication tool between analysts and decision-makers.

[1]  Heinz A. Preisig,et al.  Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems , 2002 .

[2]  Hans Brix,et al.  Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Europe , 1998 .

[3]  Mario Enea,et al.  Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP , 2004, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Javier Tuya,et al.  EDSS for the evaluation of alternatives in waste water collecting systems design , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Peter Steen Mikkelsen,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of small wastewater systems. A context-oriented planning approach , 1999 .

[7]  Raimund Haberl,et al.  Constructed Wetlands for Pollution Control , 2001 .

[8]  Donald A. Hammer,et al.  Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment , 2020 .

[9]  D. Mara Domestic Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries , 2004 .

[10]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[11]  M. Abu-Taleb Application of multicriteria analysis to the design of wastewater treatment in a nationally protected area , 1999 .

[12]  Sherwood C. Reed,et al.  Natural Systems for Waste Management and Treatment , 1994 .

[13]  Yu Jing,et al.  A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Ranking of alternatives with ordered weighted averaging operators , 2004, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[15]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings , 2004 .

[16]  Rafael Mujeriego,et al.  Wastewater treatment for small communities in Catalonia (Mediterranean region) , 2001 .

[17]  George Tchobanoglous,et al.  Wastewater Engineering Treatment Disposal Reuse , 1972 .

[18]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy arithmetic with requisite constraints , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  Andreas N. Angelakis,et al.  Application of Cost Criteria for Selection of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Systems , 2003 .