Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

In the flash-lag illusion, a moving object aligned with a flash is perceived to be offset in the direction of motion following the flash. In the "flash-drag" illusion, a flash is mislocalized in the direction of nearby motion. In the "flash-jump" illusion, a transient change in the appearance of a moving object (e.g., color) is mislocalized in the direction of subsequent motion. Finally, in the Frohlich illusion, the starting position of a suddenly appearing moving object is mislocalized in the direction of the subsequent motion. We demonstrate, in a series of experiments, a unified explanation for all these illusions: Perceptual localization is influenced by motion signals collected over approximately 80 ms after a query is triggered. These demonstrations rule out "latency difference" and asynchronous feature binding models, in which objects appear in their real positions but misaligned in time. Instead, the illusions explored here are best understood as biases in localization caused by motion signals. We suggest that motion biasing exists because it allows the visual system to account for neural processing delays by retrospectively "pushing" an object closer to its true physical location, and we propose directions for exploring the neural mechanisms underlying the dynamic updating of location by the activity of motion-sensitive neurons.

[1]  Markus Lappe,et al.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process , 2000, Vision Research.

[2]  Zheng Tang,et al.  3D flash lag illusion , 2004, Vision Research.

[3]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern , 1999, Nature.

[4]  Endel Põder,et al.  Change in feature space is not necessary for the flash-lag effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[5]  David Whitney,et al.  Second-order motion shifts perceived position , 2006, Vision Research.

[6]  Gregory Bock,et al.  Experimental and theoretical studies of consciousness , 1993 .

[7]  Szonya Durant,et al.  Temporal dependence of local motion induced shifts in perceived position , 2004, Vision Research.

[8]  Gopathy Purushothaman,et al.  Moving ahead through differential visual latency , 1998, Nature.

[9]  H. Bedell,et al.  Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. , 2000, Science.

[10]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Flash lag in depth , 2006, Vision Research.

[11]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Updating and the Flash-Lag Effect , 2004, Psychological science.

[12]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[14]  Mazyar Fallah,et al.  A Motion-Dependent Distortion of Retinotopy in Area V4 , 2006, Neuron.

[15]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Shifts in perceived position of flashed stimuli by illusory object motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[16]  I. Murakami,et al.  Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  David Whitney,et al.  Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  Reconstructing the visual image in space and time , 1979, Nature.

[19]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Illusory Displacement of Equiluminous Kinetic Edges , 1990, Perception.

[20]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  M A Changizi,et al.  ‘Perceiving the Present’ as a Framework for Ecological Explanations of the Misperception of Projected Angle and Angular Size , 2001, Perception.

[22]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[23]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[24]  Ian M Thornton,et al.  The onset repulsion effect. , 2002, Spatial vision.

[25]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Untangling spatial from temporal illusions , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  B. Libet,et al.  The neural time factor in conscious and unconscious events. , 2007, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[27]  M. Lappe,et al.  Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  David C. Burr,et al.  How does binocular delay give information about depth? , 1979, Vision Research.

[29]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  The Line-Motion Illusion Can Be Reversed by Motion Signals after the Line Disappears , 2003, Perception.

[31]  Y. Dan,et al.  Asymmetry in Visual Cortical Circuits Underlying Motion-Induced Perceptual Mislocalization , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[33]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[34]  R. Snowden,et al.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion , 1998, Current Biology.

[35]  Nestor Caticha,et al.  Computational neurobiology of the flash-lag effect , 2005, Vision Research.

[36]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[37]  M. Lappe,et al.  The position of moving objects. , 2000, Perception.

[38]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Perceptual organization of moving stimuli modulates the flash-lag effect. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  D. Mackay Perceptual Stability of a Stroboscopically Lit Visual Field containing Self-Luminous Objects , 1958, Nature.