Optimal CT breathing protocol for combined thoracic PET/CT.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the optimal breathing protocol for combined PET/CT scans of the thorax. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Eighty combined PET/CT scans were obtained in 64 patients (30 women, 34 men; mean age, 57 years; range, 19-86 years). The 80 PET/CT scans consisted of five group of patients (16 PET/CT scans per group) who underwent whole-body combined 18F-FDG PET/CT with different CT breathing protocols: expiration, mid suspended breath-hold, quiet breathing, small breath in, and regular breath in. The quality of alignment was analyzed at the diaphragm, aortic arch, heart, thoracic spine, and lung apices using a scale of ratings from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare alignment between breathing protocols for each anatomic reference point. RESULTS Alignment of the PET and CT data sets was excellent with three breathing protocols: expiration, mid suspended breath-hold, and quiet breathing, with no statistical differences. Significant misalignment occurred at the diaphragm (p < 0.0001) and heart (p < 0.0001) with the small breath-in and regular breath-in techniques. CONCLUSION Excellent image fusion of combined PET/CT data sets in the thorax, especially at the diaphragm and heart, can be achieved with expiration, mid suspended breath-hold, or quiet breathing. Quiet breathing is recommended for optimal patient comfort during acquisition of attenuation-correction CT data sets.

[1]  A. Fischman,et al.  Hybrid PET/CT of the Thorax: When Is Computer Registration Necessary? , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  S. Weise,et al.  Improved image interpretation with registered thoracic CT and positron emission tomography data sets. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Advances in Attenuation Correction Techniques in PET. , 2007, PET clinics.

[6]  K. Gould Positron emission tomography in coronary artery disease , 2007, Current opinion in cardiology.

[7]  Y. Shibamoto,et al.  The Pitfalls of FDG-PET for Managing the Patients with Primary Lung Cancer , 2007 .

[8]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Accuracy of image coregistration of pulmonary lesions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using an integrated PET/CT system. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Improved Radiologic Staging of Lung Cancer with 2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Registration , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging. , 2003, Radiology.

[11]  Gustav K. von Schulthess,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a breathing protocol for PET/CT , 2004, European Radiology.

[12]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.