Network-level mechanisms underlying effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on visuomotor learning impairments in schizophrenia

Motor learning is a fundamental skill to our daily lives. Dysfunction in motor performance in schizophrenia (Sz) is associated with poor social and functional outcomes, but nevertheless remains understudied relative to other neurocognitive domains. Moreover, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can influence underlying brain function in Sz and may be especially useful in enhancing local cortical plasticity, but underlying neural mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here, we evaluated performance of Sz individuals on the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT), which has been extensively used in prior tDCS research, in combination with concurrent tDCS and EEG source localization first to evaluate the integrity of visuomotor learning in Sz relative to other cognitive domains and second to investigate underlying neural mechanisms. Twenty-seven individuals with Sz and 21 healthy controls (HC) performed the SRTT task as they received sham or active tDCS and simultaneous EEG recording. Measures of motor, neuropsychological and global functioning were also assessed. Impaired SRTT performance correlated significantly with deficits in motor performance, working memory, and global functioning. Time-frequency (“Beamformer”) EEG source localization showed beta-band coherence across supplementary-motor, primary-motor and visual cortex regions, with reduced visuomotor coherence in Sz relative to HC. Cathodal tDCS targeting both visual and motor regions resulted in significant modulation in coherence particularly across the motor-visual nodes of the network accompanied by significant improvement in motor learning in both controls and patients. Overall, these findings demonstrate the utility of the SRTT to study mechanisms of visuomotor impairment in Sz and demonstrate significant tDCS effects on both learning and connectivity when applied over either visual or motor regions. The findings support continued study of dysfunctional dorsal-stream visual connectivity and motor plasticity as components of cognitive impairment in Sz, of local tDCS administration for enhancement of plasticity, and of source-space EEG-based biomarkers for evaluation of underlying neural mechanisms.

[1]  M. Nitsche,et al.  NMDA receptor–related mechanisms of dopaminergic modulation of tDCS-induced neuroplasticity , 2022, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  M. Ghilardi,et al.  Movement-related beta ERD and ERS abnormalities in neuropsychiatric disorders , 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Javitt Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia: Toward Novel Therapeutics. , 2022, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[4]  J. Brunelin,et al.  Recent advances in noninvasive brain stimulation for schizophrenia , 2022, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[5]  A. Brunoni,et al.  Adjunctive tDCS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled studies. , 2022, Asian journal of psychiatry.

[6]  S. Lefebvre,et al.  Motor abnormalities are associated with poor social and functional outcomes in schizophrenia. , 2022, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[7]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Discernible effects of tDCS over the primary motor and posterior parietal cortex on different stages of motor learning , 2022, Brain Structure and Function.

[8]  Lauren E. Oberlin,et al.  Relationships between Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Resting State Functional Connectivity in Patients with Schizophrenia and Healthy Controls: A Preliminary Study , 2021, Brain sciences.

[9]  M. Mak,et al.  Single session transcranial direct current stimulation to the primary motor cortex fails to enhance early motor sequence learning in Parkinson’s disease , 2021, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  B. Conway,et al.  Electroencephalographic analysis of brain activity after interventions with transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex: a systematic review , 2020, Adapt. Behav..

[11]  Ilkem Ceren Sigirtmac,et al.  Determination of the optimal cutoff values and validity of the Purdue Pegboard Test , 2021, British Journal of Occupational Therapy.

[12]  T. Sumiyoshi,et al.  Neurobiological Mechanisms of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders; Neurophysiological, Chemical, and Anatomical Considerations , 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[13]  B. Feige,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation induces long-term potentiation-like plasticity in the human visual cortex , 2021, Translational Psychiatry.

[14]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Activity flow underlying abnormalities in brain activations and cognition in schizophrenia , 2020, Science Advances.

[15]  Pejman Sehatpour,et al.  Comparison of cortical network effects of high-definition and conventional tDCS during visuomotor processing , 2020, Brain Stimulation.

[16]  D. Javitt,et al.  Multimodal Computational Modeling of Visual Object Recognition Deficits but Intact Repetition Priming in Schizophrenia , 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry.

[17]  D. Javitt,et al.  Network-level mechanisms underlying effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on visuomotor learning , 2020, NeuroImage.

[18]  D. Javitt,et al.  Neurophysiological, Oculomotor, and Computational Modeling of Impaired Reading Ability in Schizophrenia. , 2020, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[19]  M. Bikson,et al.  Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders , 2020, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[20]  F. Piras,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognition in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Systematic Review of the Evidence and Future Directions , 2020, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[21]  G. Northoff,et al.  All roads lead to the motor cortex: psychomotor mechanisms and their biochemical modulation in psychiatric disorders , 2020, Molecular Psychiatry.

[22]  Michael F. Green,et al.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Visual Neuroplasticity in Schizophrenia , 2020, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[23]  Kelvin O. Lim,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) elicits stimulus-specific enhancement of cortical plasticity , 2020, NeuroImage.

[24]  Russell H. Tobe,et al.  Differential Patterns of Visual Sensory Alteration Underlying Face Emotion Recognition Impairment and Motion Perception Deficits in Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2019, Biological Psychiatry.

[25]  Sándor Beniczky,et al.  Taking the EEG Back Into the Brain: The Power of Multiple Discrete Sources , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[26]  Megan A. Boudewyn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation , 2019, Molecular Psychiatry.

[27]  Michael F. Green,et al.  Nonsocial and social cognition in schizophrenia: current evidence and future directions , 2019, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[28]  M. Lavidor,et al.  Non-linear effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex on implicit motor learning , 2019, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  J. Brunelin,et al.  A Review of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Hallucinations in Patients With Schizophrenia , 2018, The journal of ECT.

[30]  J. Stephen,et al.  Neuroimaging investigations of dorsal stream processing and effects of stimulus synchrony in schizophrenia , 2018, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[31]  Yu Huang,et al.  ROAST: An Open-Source, Fully-Automated, Realistic Volumetric-Approach-Based Simulator For TES , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[32]  M. Ota,et al.  Manual dexterity and brain structure in patients with schizophrenia: A whole-brain magnetic resonance imaging study , 2018, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[33]  D. Javitt,et al.  Seeing the World as it is: Mimicking Veridical Motion Perception in Schizophrenia Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Healthy Participants , 2018, Brain Topography.

[34]  D. Javitt,et al.  Sensory and cross-network contributions to response inhibition in patients with schizophrenia , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[35]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[36]  Jason P Gallivan,et al.  The dorsal "action" pathway. , 2018, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[37]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  H. Laufs,et al.  Non-linear Relationship between BOLD Activation and Amplitude of Beta Oscillations in the Supplementary Motor Area during Rhythmic Finger Tapping and Internal Timing , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  P. Brown,et al.  Modulation of Long-Range Connectivity Patterns via Frequency-Specific Stimulation of Human Cortex , 2017, Current Biology.

[40]  J. Lum,et al.  Procedural learning in Parkinson’s disease, specific language impairment, dyslexia, schizophrenia, developmental coordination disorder, and autism spectrum disorders: A second-order meta-analysis , 2017, Brain and Cognition.

[41]  B. Cuthbert,et al.  Developing a Motor Systems Domain for the NIMH RDoC Program. , 2017, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[42]  G. Northoff,et al.  What Can Different Motor Circuits Tell Us About Psychosis? An RDoC Perspective , 2017, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[43]  Min-Fang Kuo,et al.  The application of tDCS for the treatment of psychiatric diseases , 2017, International review of psychiatry.

[44]  Bettina Pollok,et al.  Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the left premotor cortex (PMC) stabilizes a newly learned motor sequence , 2017, Behavioural Brain Research.

[45]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  D. Javitt,et al.  Applying Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Over the Dorsal Visual Pathway Induces Schizophrenia-like Disruption of Perceptual Closure , 2016, Brain Topography.

[47]  B. Meier,et al.  How Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Can Modulate Implicit Motor Sequence Learning and Consolidation: A Brief Review , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[48]  B. Cheeran,et al.  Relationship Between Non-invasive Brain Stimulation-induced Plasticity and Capacity for Motor Learning , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[49]  Jose M Carmena,et al.  Neural oscillations: beta band activity across motor networks , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[50]  V. Mittal,et al.  Updating the research domain criteria: the utility of a motor dimension , 2015, Psychological Medicine.

[51]  Antigona Martinez,et al.  Reading deficits in schizophrenia and individuals at high clinical risk: relationship to sensory function, course of illness, and psychosocial outcome. , 2014, The American journal of psychiatry.

[52]  Thomas F. Münte,et al.  Delineating the cortico-striatal-cerebellar network in implicit motor sequence learning , 2014, NeuroImage.

[53]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Understanding tDCS effects in schizophrenia: a systematic review of clinical data and an integrated computation modeling analysis , 2014, Expert review of medical devices.

[54]  M. McDonnell,et al.  Use of Objective Psychomotor Tests in Health Professionals , 2014, Perceptual and motor skills.

[55]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[56]  Mark F. Bear,et al.  Learned spatiotemporal sequence recognition and prediction in primary visual cortex , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  T. Insel,et al.  Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[58]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain , 2013, NeuroImage.

[59]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Impaired magnocellular/dorsal stream activation predicts impaired reading ability in schizophrenia☆ , 2012, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[60]  S. Kantak,et al.  Primary motor and premotor cortex in implicit sequence learning – evidence for competition between implicit and explicit human motor memory systems , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[61]  Sarah E. Morris,et al.  Research Domain Criteria: cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior , 2012, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[62]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox. , 2011, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[63]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[64]  D. Westwood,et al.  Grasping behavior in schizophrenia suggests selective impairment in the dorsal visual pathway. , 2008, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[65]  W. Singer,et al.  The role of oscillations and synchrony in cortical networks and their putative relevance for the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. , 2008, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[66]  Richard J. Siegert,et al.  Is implicit sequence learning impaired in schizophrenia? A meta-analysis , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[67]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Imaging the human motor system’s beta-band synchronization during isometric contraction , 2008, NeuroImage.

[68]  R. Jong,et al.  Dissociations between motor-related EEG measures in a cued movement sequence task , 2008, Cortex.

[69]  Pejman Sehatpour,et al.  A human intracranial study of long-range oscillatory coherence across a frontal–occipital–hippocampal brain network during visual object processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Michael F. Green,et al.  The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. , 2008, The American journal of psychiatry.

[71]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[72]  Michael F. Green,et al.  The NIMH MATRICS Initiative: Development of a Consensus Cognitive Battery , 2007 .

[73]  W. Singer,et al.  Neural Synchrony in Brain Disorders: Relevance for Cognitive Dysfunctions and Pathophysiology , 2006, Neuron.

[74]  Alexandra T Basford,et al.  Cortical control of motor sequences , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[75]  Pejman Sehatpour,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of human object recognition processing: An integrated high-density electrical mapping and functional imaging study of “closure” processes , 2006, NeuroImage.

[76]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[77]  N. Revheim,et al.  The independent living scales as a measure of functional outcome for schizophrenia. , 2004, Psychiatric services.

[78]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[80]  Karsten Hoechstetter,et al.  BESA Source Coherence: A New Method to Study Cortical Oscillatory Coupling , 2003, Brain Topography.

[81]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[82]  S. Keele,et al.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. , 2003, Psychological review.

[83]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Evidence for distinct beta resonance frequencies in human EEG related to specific sensorimotor cortical areas , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[84]  David Poeppel,et al.  Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[85]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-Related changes of band power and coherence: methodology and interpretation. , 1999, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[86]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[87]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[88]  John Suckling,et al.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[89]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  D. Braff,et al.  Transient versus sustained visual channels in the visual backward masking deficits of schizophrenia patients , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[91]  W. Singer,et al.  Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas , 1997, Nature.

[92]  S. Bressler Large-scale cortical networks and cognition , 1995, Brain Research Reviews.

[93]  S. Bressler,et al.  Episodic multiregional cortical coherence at multiple frequencies during visual task performance , 1993, Nature.

[94]  F. Perrin,et al.  Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[95]  F. Donders On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[96]  H. Jasper,et al.  Electrocorticograms in man: Effect of voluntary movement upon the electrical activity of the precentral gyrus , 1949 .

[97]  J. Tiffin,et al.  The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.