Estimating implied rates of discount in healthcare decision-making.

OBJECTIVES To consider whether implied rates of discounting from the perspectives of individual and society differ, and whether implied rates of discounting in health differ from those implied in choices involving finance or "goods". DESIGN The study comprised first a review of economics, health economics and social science literature and then an empirical estimate of implied rates of discounting in four fields: personal financial, personal health, public financial and public health, in representative samples of the public and of healthcare professionals. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Samples were drawn in the former county and health authority district of South Glamorgan, Wales. The public sample was a representative random sample of men and women, aged over 18 years and drawn from electoral registers. The health professional sample was drawn at random with the cooperation of professional leads to include doctors, nurses, professions allied to medicine, public health, planners and administrators. RESULTS The literature review revealed few empirical studies in representative samples of the population, few direct comparisons of public with private decision-making and few direct comparisons of health with financial discounting. Implied rates of discounting varied widely and studies suggested that discount rates are higher the smaller the value of the outcome and the shorter the period considered. The relationship between implied discount rates and personal attributes was mixed, possibly reflecting the limited nature of the samples. Although there were few direct comparisons, some studies found that individuals apply different rates of discount to social compared with private comparisons and health compared with financial. The present study also found a wide range of implied discount rates, with little systematic effect of age, gender, educational level or long-term illness. There was evidence, in both samples, that people chose a lower rate of discount in comparisons made on behalf of society than in comparisons made for themselves. Both public and health professional samples tended to choose lower discount rates in health-related comparisons than in finance-related comparisons. It was also suggested that implied rates of discount, derived from responses to hypothetical questions, can be influenced by detail of question framing. CONCLUSIONS The study suggested that both the lay public and healthcare professionals consider that the discount rate appropriate for public decisions is lower than that for private decisions. This finding suggests that lay people as well as healthcare professionals, used to making decisions on behalf of others, recognise that society is not simply an aggregate of individuals. It also implies a general appreciation that society is more stable and has a more predictable future than does the individual. There is fairly general support for this view in the theoretical literature and limited support in the few previous direct comparisons. Further research is indicated, possibly involving more in-depth interviewing and drawing inference on real, rather than hypothetical choices.

[1]  J. Cairns,et al.  The estimation of marginal time preference in a UK-wide sample (TEMPUS) project. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[2]  E. Nord,et al.  The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability adjusted life years , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  James Raftery,et al.  Economics notes: Discounting , 1999 .

[4]  J. Weyant,et al.  Discounting and Intergenerational Equity , 1999 .

[5]  R. Loulou,et al.  Energy and environment , 2005 .

[6]  J Cairns,et al.  Constant and decreasing timing aversion for saving lives. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[7]  Saving future lives. A comparison of three discounting models. , 1997, Health economics.

[8]  T O Jefferson,et al.  Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ , 1996, BMJ.

[9]  Discounting the future: influence of the economic model. , 1996, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[10]  G. Chapman Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  A. Elstein,et al.  Valuing the Future , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  J. Olsen Persons vs years: two ways of eliciting implicit weights. , 1994, Health economics.

[13]  Colin Price,et al.  Time, discounting, and value , 1993 .

[14]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Time Preference in Medical Decision Making and Cost - Effectiveness Analysis , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  M. Parsonage,et al.  Discounting and health benefits. , 1992, Health economics.

[16]  J Cairns,et al.  Discounting and health benefits: another perspective. , 1992, Health economics.

[17]  Maureen L. Cropper,et al.  Rates of Time Preference for Saving Lives , 1992 .

[18]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[19]  M. Cropper,et al.  Discounting Human Lives , 1991 .

[20]  B. Abel-Smith The Economics of Health Care , 1990 .

[21]  Henry Pelling Chancellor of the Exchequer , 1989 .

[22]  R. Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--II: Scaling methods. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  R L Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--III: Population and context effects. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  D. Cohen,et al.  Health, prevention and economics. , 1992 .

[25]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1987 .

[26]  M. Drummond,et al.  Health Care Technology: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Public Policy@@@Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes , 1988 .

[27]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Cognitive strategies in a complex judgment task: Analyses of concurrent verbal reports and judgments of cumulated risk over different exposure times , 1985 .

[28]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Preferences for Health Outcomes , 1984, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[29]  A. Cartwright Health surveys in practice and in potential: A critical review of their scope and methods , 1983 .

[30]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  The Measurement of Patients' Values in Medicine , 1982, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[31]  G. R. Corey,et al.  Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy , 1982 .

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Psychology of Preferences , 1982 .

[33]  P. Schoemaker The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .

[34]  Peter Wright,et al.  Retrospective reports on the causes of decisions. , 1981 .

[35]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[36]  G. Jasso,et al.  Distributive Justice and Earned Income , 1977 .

[37]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[38]  M. Buxton,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of long-term haemodialysis for chronic renal failure. , 1975, British medical journal.

[39]  D. Mueller Intergenerational justice and the social discount rate , 1974 .

[40]  M. J. Rosenberg,et al.  WHEN DISSONANCE FAILS: ON ELIMINATING EVALUATION APPREHENSION FROM ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[42]  W. Beveridge Social Insurance and Allied Services , 1942 .