Risk, Ambiguity, and Decision Choice: Some Additional Evidence*

This paper extends prior research by jointly assessing the roles of risk attitude and tolerance for ambiguity in predicting choice. An experiment examined the effects of these variables on decisions made in four different scenarios. The four scenarios (treatment combinations) were generated by manipulating risk and ambiguity into two levels (high and low). The context was defined in terms of a sample size selection problem. The second issue explored was the effect of attitudes toward risk and ambiguity on decision confidence. The results indicate that (1) both risk attitude and ambiguity intolerance determined choice behavior, (2) the roles of these individual attitudes depend on the levels of the two treatment variables of risk and ambiguity, (3) the presence of ambiguity accentuates the perception of risk in individual subjects, and (4) decision makers who are less risk averse, and have more tolerance for ambiguity, display greater confidence in their choice. The paper discusses some of the managerial implications of the results.

[1]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference. , 1985 .

[2]  R. M. Hogarth,et al.  Ambiguity and competitive decision making: Some implications and tests , 1989 .

[3]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[4]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Are Risk-Attitudes Related Across Domains and Response Modes? , 1990 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty , 1991 .

[6]  D. Ellsberg.  Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[7]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success , 1988 .

[8]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Risk, ambiguity, and insurance , 1989 .

[9]  Joseph J. Giglierano,et al.  Missing the Boat and Sinking the Boat: A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurial Risk , 1986 .

[10]  P. J. Beck,et al.  Experimental Evidence on Taxpayer Reporting under Uncertainty , 1991 .

[11]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Effects of ambiguity in market experiments , 1993 .

[12]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Ambiguity and rationality , 1988 .

[13]  S. Lichtenstein,et al.  Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?*1 , 1977 .

[14]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Modeling Ambiguity in Decisions Under Uncertainty , 1988 .

[15]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  How Believing in Ourselves Increases Risk Taking: Perceived Self‐Efficacy and Opportunity Recognition , 1994 .

[16]  Robert L. Winkler.  Ambiguity, probability, preference, and decision analysis , 1991 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[18]  Dipankar Ghosh,et al.  Structure of Uncertainty and Decision Making: An Experimental Investigation* , 1993 .

[19]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[20]  Manash R. Ray,et al.  Risk Attitude, Ambiguity Intolerance and Decision Making: An Exploratory Investigation* , 1992 .

[21]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[23]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[25]  S. Budner.  Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .