Eukaryotic non-coding DNA is functional: evidence from the differential scaling of cryptomonad genomes

Genic DNA functions are commonplace: coding for proteins and specifying non-messenger RNA structure. Yet most DNA in the biosphere is non–genic, existing in nuclei as non–coding or secondary DNA. Why so much secondary DNA exists and why its amount per genome varies over orders of magnitude (correlating positively with cell volume) are central biological problems. A novel perspective on secondary DNA function comes from natural eukaryote–eukaryote chimaeras (cryptomonads and chlorarachneans) where two phylogenetically distinct nuclei have coevolved within one cell for hundreds of millions of years. By comparing cryptomonad species differing 13–fold in cell volume, we show that nuclear and nucleomorph genome sizes obey fundamentally different scaling laws. Following a more than 125–fold reduction in DNA content, nucleomorph genomes exhibit little variation in size. Furthermore, the present lack of significant amounts of nucleomorph secondary DNA confirms that selection can readily eliminate functionless nuclear DNA, refuting ‘selfish’ and ‘junk’ theories of secondary DNA. Cryptomonad nuclear DNA content varied 12–fold: as in other eukaryotes, larger cells have extra DNA, which is almost certainly secondary DNA positively selected for a volume–related function. The skeletal DNA theory explains why nuclear genome size increases with cell volume and, using new evidence on nucleomorph gene functions, why nucleomorph genomes do not.

[1]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Chloroplast protein and centrosomal genes, a tRNA intron, and odd telomeres in an unusually compact eukaryotic genome, the cryptomonad nucleomorph. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Diversification of a Chimaeric Algal Group, the Chlorarachniophytes: Phylogeny of Nuclear and Nucleomorph Small-Subunit rRNA Genes , 1999 .

[3]  G. McFadden,et al.  Molecular, morphological and phylogenetic characterization of six chlorarachniophyte strains , 1999 .

[4]  D. Petrov,et al.  Pseudogene evolution in Drosophila suggests a high rate of DNA loss. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  G. McFadden,et al.  Size isn't everything: lessons in genetic miniaturisation from nucleomorphs. , 1997, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  M. Sieracki,et al.  CELLULAR DNA CONTENT OF MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON USING TWO NEW FLUOROCHROMES: TAXONOMIC AND ECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS 1 , 1997 .

[7]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Sarcomonad ribosomal RNA sequences, rhizopod phylogeny, and the origin of euglyphid amoebae , 1997 .

[8]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Bonsai genomics: sequencing the smallest eukaryotic genomes. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[9]  Geoffrey I. McFadden,et al.  Cryptomonad nuclear and nucleomorph 18S rRNA phylogeny , 1996 .

[10]  Y Van de Peer,et al.  Substitution rate calibration of small subunit ribosomal RNA identifies chlorarachniophyte endosymbionts as remnants of green algae. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  G. McFadden,et al.  The miniaturized nuclear genome of eukaryotic endosymbiont contains genes that overlap, genes that are cotranscribed, and the smallest known spliceosomal introns. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[13]  T. Cavalier-smith Membrane heredity, symbiogenesis, and the multiple origins of algae , 1995 .

[14]  D. Spencer,et al.  Cryptomonad algae are evolutionary chimaeras of two phylogenetically distinct unicellular eukaryotes , 1991, Nature.

[15]  D. Vaulot,et al.  Flow cytometric determination of phyto-plankton DNA in cultures and oceanic populations , 1991 .

[16]  S. Eschbach,et al.  Isolation and preliminary characterization of the nucleus and the nucleomorph of a cryptomonad, Pyrenomonas salina. , 1990, European journal of cell biology.

[17]  R. Wetherbee,et al.  Proteomonas sulcata gen. et sp. nov. (Cryptophyceae), a cryptomonad with two morphologically distinct and alternating forms , 1986 .

[18]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Selfish DNA and the origin of introns , 1985, Nature.

[19]  D. Hibberd,et al.  CYTOLOGY AND ULTRASTRUCTURE OF CHLORARACHNION REPTANS (CHLORARACHNIOPHYTA DIVISIO NOVA, CHLORARACHNIOPHYCEAE CLASSIS NOVA) 1 , 1984 .

[20]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs , 1983, Cell.

[21]  William D. Taylor,et al.  Phenotypic Correlates of Genomic DNA Content in Unicellular Eukaryotes and Other Cells , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[22]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Chromatin from the unicellular red alga Porphyridium has a nucleosome structure. , 1982, Journal of cell science.

[23]  F. Crick,et al.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite , 1980, Nature.

[24]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution , 1980, Nature.

[25]  T. Cavalier-smith r- and K-tactics in the evolution of protist developmental systems: cell and genome size, phenotype diversifying selection, and cell cycle patterns. , 1980, Bio Systems.

[26]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. , 1978, Journal of cell science.

[27]  C. Friz,et al.  The biochemical composition of the free-living amoebae Chaos chaos, Amoeba dubia and Amoeba proteus. , 1968, Comparative biochemistry and physiology.