Our health, our research. Identifying public health research priorities among children and youth in a multiethnic population: protocol for a community-based participatory health research priority survey

Introduction Emphasis on public involvement (PI) in health research has increased in the last 20 years. However, there is limited literature on PI in planning and conducting population-based health research. This study aims to identify child and adolescent health research priorities among children and stakeholder groups in Northern Norway by inviting PI groups to collaborate with researchers to develop and conduct a research priority survey. Methods and analysis This is a community-based participatory research project. The methods for research prioritisation are informed by those developed by the James Lind Alliance. In addition, the survey design and engagement plans are developed in extensive collaboration with child and youth stakeholder groups. Nine PI groups have met three times to develop an anonymous child and youth health research priority survey, as well as strategies for recruitment and dissemination of results. All 5th–10th grade pupils in the Finnmark region will be invited to participate in the survey, as well as caretakers and adults working for and with children and youth. The survey results will be analysed in collaboration with the PI groups, and research priorities checked with existing research literature. Ethics and dissemination The study is registered and approved by the Data Protection Authorities at the Finnmark Hospital Trust and the Expert Committee for Sami Health Research. Descriptions of methods applied and the survey results will be published in popular and scientific publications.

[1]  Gunn Marit Aasvang,et al.  Changes in life expectancy and disease burden in Norway, 1990–2019: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 , 2022, The Lancet. Public health.

[2]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review , 2022, BMC Health Services Research.

[3]  E. Racine,et al.  A Review of Approaches, Strategies and Ethical Considerations in Participatory Research With Children , 2021, International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

[4]  K. Malterud,et al.  Patients participating as co-researchers in health research: A systematic review of outcomes and experiences , 2020, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[5]  N. Modi Involving children and young people in research , 2020, Paediatrics and Child Health.

[6]  L. Berring,et al.  Service user's actual involvement in mental health research practices: A scoping review. , 2019, International journal of mental health nursing.

[7]  Kate Louise Milosavljevic,et al.  Facilitating non-tokenistic user involvement in research , 2019, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[8]  P. Fransquet,et al.  Public Involvement in Global Genomics Research: A Scoping Review , 2019, Front. Public Health.

[9]  N. Charness,et al.  Leisure activities , 2019, Designing for Older Adults.

[10]  J. Lander,et al.  Involving patients and the public in medical and health care research studies: An exploratory survey on participant recruiting and representativeness from the perspective of study authors , 2019, PloS one.

[11]  Sian Rees,et al.  Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[12]  S. Verguet,et al.  Geographic health inequalities in Norway: a Gini analysis of cross-county differences in mortality from 1980 to 2014 , 2018, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[13]  E. Vartiainen,et al.  Participation rates by educational levels have diverged during 25 years in Finnish health examination surveys , 2018, European journal of public health.

[14]  B. Carter,et al.  Being Participatory: Researching with Children and Young People , 2018, Springer International Publishing.

[15]  H. Roberts,et al.  Co‐production with “vulnerable” groups: Balancing protection and participation , 2017, Health science reports.

[16]  Hamed Taherdoost Determining Sample Size; How to Calculate Survey Sample Size , 2017 .

[17]  N. Britten,et al.  "How can anybody be representative for those kind of people?" Forms of patient representation in health research, and why it is always contestable. , 2017, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Deirdre Horgan Child participatory research methods: Attempts to go ‘deeper’ , 2017 .

[19]  J. DiMarco Creative Research Methods , 2017 .

[20]  D. Strech,et al.  Do Public Involvement Activities in Biomedical Research and Innovation Recruit Representatively? A Systematic Qualitative Review , 2016, Public Health Genomics.

[21]  S. Parsons,et al.  What do pharmaceutical industry professionals in Europe believe about involving patients and the public in research and development of medicines? A qualitative interview study , 2016, BMJ Open.

[22]  C. Daum,et al.  Worth the Risk? Muddled Relationships in Community-Based Participatory Research , 2016, Qualitative health research.

[23]  C. Brayne,et al.  Changing non-participation in epidemiological studies of older people: evidence from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II , 2015, Age and ageing.

[24]  C. Gamble,et al.  What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  L. Rychetnik,et al.  Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research. , 2015, Social science & medicine.

[26]  G. Fondahl,et al.  Arctic Human Development Report. Regional Processes and Global Linkages. , 2015 .

[27]  C. Chew‐Graham,et al.  PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[28]  S. Staniszewska,et al.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[29]  J. Sloan,et al.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[30]  S. Demarest,et al.  Socio-economic differences in participation of households in a Belgian national health survey. , 2013, European journal of public health.

[31]  P. Beresford From ‘other’ to involved: user involvement in research: an emerging paradigm , 2013 .

[32]  I. Chalmers,et al.  Is academia meeting the needs of non-academic users of the results of research? , 2012, The Lancet.

[33]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Beyond PICO , 2012, Qualitative health research.

[34]  A. Bundy,et al.  Participation of mental health consumers in research: training addressed and reliability assessed. , 2012, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[35]  J. Bergold,et al.  Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion , 2012 .

[36]  J. Gundgaard,et al.  The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys , 2010, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[37]  T. Abma,et al.  Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas , 2010, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[38]  J. Boote,et al.  Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health research , 2009, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[39]  K. Faulkner Presentation and Representation , 2009 .

[40]  L. Lundy ‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child , 2007 .

[41]  S. Galea,et al.  Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. , 2007, Annals of epidemiology.

[42]  Hanna Tolonen,et al.  25-year Trends and Socio-demographic Differences in Response Rates: Finnish Adult Health Behaviour Survey , 2006, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[43]  T. Waterston,et al.  The Convention on the Rights of the Child , 2006, The Lancet.

[44]  Hugh McLaughlin,et al.  Involving Young Service Users as Co-Researchers: Possibilities, Benefits and Costs , 2005 .

[45]  E. Zahnd,et al.  Community-based Participatory Research in the California Health Interview Survey , 2005, Preventing chronic disease.

[46]  Hye-Shin Kim,et al.  Consumer profiles of apparel product involvement and values , 2005 .

[47]  J. Scadding,et al.  The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials , 2004, The Lancet.

[48]  J. Boote,et al.  Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. , 2002, Health policy.

[49]  Paul Dieppe,et al.  Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer , 2000, The Lancet.

[50]  H. Goodare,et al.  Involving patients in clinical research , 1999 .

[51]  Inger Marie Lid,et al.  Samproduksjon i forskning , 2019 .

[52]  T. Water Ethical Issues in Participatory Research with Children and Young People , 2018 .

[53]  Anne Graham,et al.  Ethical research involving children , 2013 .

[54]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Community-based participatory research for health : from process to outcomes , 2008 .

[55]  L. Naing,et al.  Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies , 2006 .

[56]  James E. Bartlett,et al.  Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research , 2001 .

[57]  S Shalev,et al.  On loneliness and alienation. , 1988, The Israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences.

[58]  K. Jones,et al.  Beliefs and religion , 1972 .