PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH TEACHERS IN BLENDED LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN RESPECT TO THEIR LEARNING APPROACHES

Blended learning environment (BLE) is increasingly used in the world, especially in university degrees and it is based on integrating web-based learning and face-to-face (FTF) learning environments. Besides integrating different learning environments, BLE also addresses to students with different learning approaches. The ‘learning approach’ categorizes individuals as ‘surface learners’ and ‘deep learners’. This study investigated whether the academic performance and the satisfaction levels of the pre-service English teachers varied in respect to their learning approaches in a blended learning environment. At the end of the study it was found that a) academic performance scores of the students in the BLE did not show statistically significant difference between deep and surface learners, b) the average satisfaction level with the BLE of deep learner students was statistically significantly higher than the average of surface learner students. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that pre-service English Language teachers were in general highly satisfied with the BLE. In addition, it can be stated that the courses which are designed for the BLE contribute to the achievement of the students with surface learning approach. Based on these conclusions, BLE is advised for training of pre-service English Language teachers with different learning approaches.

[1]  Åge Diseth,et al.  Students' Evaluation of Teaching, Approaches to Learning, and Academic Achievement , 2007 .

[2]  Shreemathi S. Mayya,et al.  Learning Approaches, Learning Difficulties and ACademic Performance of Undergraduate Students of Physiotherapy , 2004 .

[3]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  James J. Wong.  Traditional Versus Hybrid Courses , 2007 .

[5]  Åge Diseth,et al.  Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: testing of mediator effects and construct validity , 2007 .

[6]  J. Biggs.  What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning , 1999 .

[7]  Barry C. Dart,et al.  Students' Conceptions of Learning, the Classroom Environment, and Approaches to Learning , 2000 .

[8]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relational Perspectives on Higher Education Teaching and Learning in the Sciences , 1999 .

[9]  J. Young.  "Hybrid" Teaching Seeks To End the Divide between Traditional and Online Instruction. , 2002 .

[10]  Demetria L. Ennis-Cole,et al.  TEACHING, TECHNOLOGY, AND SUPPORT IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM: A GUIDE FOR NEW COMMUNITY COLLEGE TEACHERS , 2004 .

[11]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended Learning Environments , 2005 .

[12]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb , 1997 .

[13]  Sarah Guri-Rosenblit,et al.  ‘Distance education’ and ‘e-learning’: Not the same thing , 2005 .

[14]  G. Huon,et al.  Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams , 2004 .

[15]  Lorelle J. Burton,et al.  The relationships between personality, approaches to learning, and academic success in first-year psychology distance education students , 2006 .

[16]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[17]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[18]  V. Beattie,et al.  Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? , 1997 .

[19]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[20]  M. Boekaerts.  Personality and the psychology of learning , 1996 .

[21]  Tom Schuller,et al.  The Changing University , 1995 .

[22]  Fernando Mortera-Gutierrez,et al.  Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-learning and Face-to-face Instruction. , 2004 .

[23]  Aleksej Heinze,et al.  Online Communication and Information Technology Education , 2006 .

[24]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  Elizabeth Boyle,et al.  The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance , 2004 .