Overview of the different personalized total knee arthroplasty with robotic assistance, how choosing?

Current limitations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) function and patient satisfaction stimulated us to question our practice. Our understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics has evolved over recent years as we now consider that a more personalized joint reconstruction may be a better-targeted goal for TKA. Implant design and surgical techniques must be advanced to better reproduce the anatomy and kinematics of native knees and ultimately provide a forgotten joint. The availability of precision tools as robotic assistance surgery can help us recreate patient anatomy and ensure components are not implanted in a position that may compromise long-term outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining in popularity and may be the future of orthopedic surgery. However, moving away from the concept of neutrally aligning every TKA dogma opens the door to new techniques emergence based on opinion and experience and leads to a certain amount of uncertainty among knee surgeons. Hence, it is important to clearly describe each technique and analyze their potential impacts and benefits. Personalized TKA techniques may be classified into 2 main families: unrestricted or restricted component orientation. In the restricted group, some will aim to reproduce native ligament laxity versus aiming for ligament isometry. When outside of their boundaries, all restricted techniques will induce anatomical changes. Similarly, most native knee having asymmetric ligaments laxity between compartments and within the same compartment during the arc of flexion; aiming for ligament isometry induces bony anatomy changes. In the current paper, we will summarize and discuss the impacts of the different robotic personalized alignment techniques, including kinematic alignment (KA), restricted kinematic alignment (rKA), inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), and functional alignment (FA). With every surgical technique, there are limitations and shortcomings. As our implants are still far from the native knee, it is primordial to understand the impacts and benefits of each technique. Mid to long data will help us in defining the new standards.

[1]  H. Graichen,et al.  Any technology assisting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will fail without the correct 3D alignment and balancing target , 2023, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[2]  M. Shahin,et al.  Personalized alignment™ for total knee arthroplasty using the ROSA® Knee and Persona® knee systems: Surgical technique , 2023, Frontiers in Surgery.

[3]  D. Wood,et al.  Functional alignment achieves a more balanced total knee arthroplasty than either mechanical alignment or kinematic alignment prior to soft tissue releases , 2022, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  M. Hull,et al.  A Surgeon That Switched to Unrestricted Kinematic Alignment with Manual Instruments Has a Short Learning Curve and Comparable Resection Accuracy and Outcomes to Those of an Experienced Surgeon , 2022, Journal of personalized medicine.

[5]  T. Luyckx,et al.  Inverse Kinematic Alignment for Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2022, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[6]  C. Tu,et al.  Kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2022, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[7]  M. Hull,et al.  Negligible effect of surgeon experience on the accuracy and time to perform unrestricted caliper verified kinematically aligned TKA with manual instruments , 2022, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  S. Lustig,et al.  Functional Alignment Philosophy in Total Knee Arthroplasty – Rationale and technique for the varus morphotype using a CT based robotic platform and individualized planning , 2022, SICOT-J.

[9]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Computer-Aided Surgery-Navigated, Functional Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Surgical Technique , 2022, Arthroplasty today.

[10]  David F. Scott,et al.  Outcomes are Better with a Medial-Stabilized vs. a Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Implanted with Kinematic Alignment. , 2022, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  M. Hirschmann,et al.  What is the “safe zone” for transition of coronal alignment from systematic to a more personalised one in total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review , 2022, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  Zong-ke Zhou,et al.  Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making , 2021, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[13]  S. Lustig,et al.  Restricted kinematic alignment may be associated with increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior-stabilized TKA: a case–control study , 2021, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  P. Vendittoli,et al.  Restricted Kinematic Alignment, the Fundamentals, and Clinical Applications , 2021, Frontiers in Surgery.

[15]  F. Catani,et al.  Joint line is restored in robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty performed with a tibia-based functional alignment , 2021, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[16]  S. MacDessi Restricted Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Scientific Exploration Involving Detailed Planning, Precise execution, and Knowledge of When to Abort , 2021, Arthroplasty today.

[17]  S. Lustig,et al.  Personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty: current concepts , 2021, SICOT-J.

[18]  Liu Yang,et al.  Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: a network meta-analysis , 2021, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[19]  S. Lustig,et al.  New Technologies in Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[20]  P. Vendittoli,et al.  The rebirth of computer-assisted surgery. Precise prosthetic implantation should be considered when targeting individualized alignment goals in total knee arthroplasty , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  P. Indelli,et al.  Combining kinematic alignment and medial stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: Basic rationale and preliminary clinical evidences. , 2020, Journal of orthopaedics.

[22]  T. Luyckx,et al.  Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[23]  G. Cacciola,et al.  What are the benefits of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty over conventional manual total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of comparative studies , 2020, Orthopedic reviews.

[24]  F. Haddad,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. , 2020, The bone & joint journal.

[25]  S. Griffiths-Jones,et al.  Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial , 2019, The bone & joint journal.

[26]  P. Vendittoli,et al.  Perception of a Natural Joint After Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  Sofie R French,et al.  A Single Surgeon Series Comparing the Outcomes of a Cruciate Retaining and Medially Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Kinematic Alignment Principles. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  P. Vendittoli,et al.  Less gap imbalance with restricted kinematic alignment than with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: simulations on 3-D bone models created from CT-scans , 2019, Acta orthopaedica.

[29]  J. Vigdorchik,et al.  Mechanical alignment: The end of an era! , 2019, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[30]  M. Hirschmann,et al.  Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review , 2019, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[31]  M. Hirschmann,et al.  Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients , 2019, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[32]  K. Doma,et al.  Medial and lateral gap laxity differential in computer‐assisted kinematic total knee arthroplasty , 2019, The bone & joint journal.

[33]  Jianying Wang,et al.  An updated meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials , 2019 .

[34]  P. Indelli,et al.  Effect of polyethylene conformity on total knee arthroplasty early clinical outcomes , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[35]  N. Hagemeister,et al.  Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[36]  F. Haddad,et al.  Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[37]  M. Hull,et al.  Implant Survival and Function Ten Years After Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[38]  S. Clemenceau,et al.  Surgical technique , 2018, Neurophysiologie Clinique.

[39]  J. Cobb,et al.  Current concepts for aligning knee implants: patient-specific or systematic? , 2018, EFORT open reviews.

[40]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  P. Vendittoli,et al.  Redefining knee replacement. , 2017, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[42]  S. Harris,et al.  Mechanical alignment technique for TKA: Are there intrinsic technical limitations? , 2017, Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research.

[43]  M. Lavigne,et al.  The Impact of Mechanical and Restricted Kinematic Alignment on Knee Anatomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[44]  A. de Laat,et al.  Network meta-analysis. , 2017, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[45]  M. Lavigne,et al.  Joint perception after hip or knee replacement surgery. , 2012, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[46]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[47]  Stephen Howell,et al.  Chapter-15 Kinematically Aligned TKA with MRI-based Cutting Guides , 2012 .

[48]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  Asymmetry of mediolateral laxity of the normal knee , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[49]  Roger Kurlan,et al.  Current Concepts , 2022 .

[50]  V. Spitzer,et al.  Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[51]  A. Sanabria,et al.  Randomized controlled trial. , 2005, World journal of surgery.

[52]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Does the femur roll-back with flexion? , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[53]  M. Burns,et al.  Case-Control Study , 2020, Definitions.

[54]  J. Hansan The end of an era. , 1996, Journal of aging & social policy.