Shot by the Messenger: Partisan Cues and Public Opinion Regarding National Security and War

Research has shown that messages of intra-party harmony tend to be ignored by the news media, while internal disputes, especially within the governing party, generally receive prominent coverage. We examine how messages of party conflict and cooperation affect public opinion regarding national security, as well as whether and how the reputations of media outlets matter. We develop a typology of partisan messages in the news, determining their likely effects based on the characteristics of the speaker, listener, news outlet, and message content. We hypothesize that criticism of a Republican president by his fellow partisan elites should be exceptionally damaging (especially on a conservative media outlet), while opposition party praise of the president should be the most helpful (especially on a liberal outlet). We test our hypotheses through an experiment and a national survey on attitudes regarding the Iraq War. The results show that credible communication (i.e., “costly” rhetoric harmful to a party) is more influential than “cheap talk” in moving public opinion. Ironically, news media outlets perceived as ideologically hostile can actually enhance the credibility of certain messages relative to “friendly” news sources.

[1]  G. K. Chandler.  A National Security Strategy for a New Century , 1998 .

[2]  M. Baum.  The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon , 2002 .

[3]  J. Sobel,et al.  STRATEGIC INFORMATION TRANSMISSION , 1982 .

[4]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? , 1998 .

[5]  J. Rauch,et al.  All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information Into News , 2006 .

[6]  David R. Mayhew.  Congress: The Electoral Connection , 1975 .

[7]  Bruce W. Jentleson,et al.  The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force , 1992 .

[8]  George C. Edwards,et al.  Who Rallies? The Anatomy of a Rally Event , 1997, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  A. George.  Assessing Presidential Character , 1974, World Politics.

[10]  Brandice Canes-Wrone.  Who Leads Whom?: Presidents, Policy, and the Public , 2005 .

[11]  P. Everts,et al.  Public Opinion and the International Use of Force , 2003 .

[12]  Joseph Lepgold,et al.  Being Useful Policy Relevance and International Relations Theory , 2000 .

[13]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[14]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology , 1991 .

[15]  A. Kühberger,et al.  The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[16]  T. Clifton Morgan,et al.  Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force , 1992 .

[17]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Values‐based Political Messages and Persuasion: Relationships among Speaker, Recipient, and Evoked Values , 2005 .

[18]  Gaye Tuchman.  Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality , 1978 .

[19]  Ole R. Holsti,et al.  Public opinion and American foreign policy , 1996 .

[20]  M. Baum,et al.  In the Eye of the Beholder: How Information Shortcuts Shape Individual Perceptions of Bias in the Media , 2008 .

[21]  J. Druckman.  Who Leads Whom?: Presidents, Policy, and the Public, by Brandice Canes-Wrone: Public Opinion Quarterly , 2006 .

[22]  M. Baum,et al.  Crossing the Water's Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage and the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon, 1979-2003 , 2007 .

[23]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Images in International Relations: An Experimental Test of Cognitive Schemata , 1997 .

[24]  John R. Oneal,et al.  Are the American People “Pretty Prudent”? Public Responses to U.S. Uses of Force, 1950–1988 , 1996 .

[25]  Scott Sigmund Gartner,et al.  Race, Casualties, and Opinion in the Vietnam War , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[26]  W. Crano,et al.  The effect of congruous and incongruous source-statement combinations upon the judged credibility of a communication. , 1968 .

[27]  J. Mueller,et al.  War, presidents, and public opinion , 1973 .

[28]  David S Hubner.  Addressing the Components of Will in the National Strategy for Victory in Iraq , 2006 .

[29]  Bruce W. Jentleson,et al.  Still Pretty Prudent , 1998 .

[30]  D. Rucinski.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[31]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[32]  D. Graber,et al.  Mass media and American politics , 1980 .

[33]  M. Peffley,et al.  How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[34]  Richard C. Eichenberg.  Victory Has Many Friends: U.S. Public Opinion and the Use of Military Force, 19812005 , 2005, International Security.

[35]  James H. Kuklinski,et al.  On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue-Taking , 1994, The Journal of Politics.

[36]  G. Cox,et al.  How Much Is Majority Status in the U.S. Congress Worth? , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[37]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator , 1966 .

[38]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing Effects , 2001 .

[39]  Peter D. Feaver,et al.  Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force , 2003 .

[40]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[41]  L. Holland.  Choosing Your Battles: American Civil–Military Relations and the Use of Force , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[42]  James N. Druckman,et al.  On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[43]  W. Rahn,et al.  The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates , 1993 .

[44]  Randall L. Calvert,et al.  The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political Advice , 1985, The Journal of Politics.