Towards a Cost Causation-Based Tariff for Distribution Networks With DG

This paper decomposes the effects of the transition from an average cost distribution tariff to a cost causation-based distribution tariff, in terms of time and location, that uses nodal prices to recover losses and an "extent-of-use" method to recover fixed network costs based on use at coincident peak. Our decomposition is designed so that the effects of using coincident peak and location for fixed network charges, as well as using marginal losses under constraints recovering the exact amount of losses, and recovering exactly the cost of network service in total can be isolated and analyzed separately. We apply our tariff transition and decomposition method to an example network with data from Uruguay to isolate the various effects with and without a distributed generation (DG) resource. We show moving to coincident peak charges and to fully charging for marginal losses while rebating the merchandising surplus through the fixed charges have the greatest effects on changes in distribution tariff charges. DG provides countervailing cost changes to distribution tariffs for loads through loss reductions and the implicit "creation" of new network capacity for which it is paid. The interaction of all these effects may lead to outcomes that are counter-intuitive, which further supports the need to decompose the tariff changes to fully understand the reasons for the direction and magnitude of changes in tariff charges in the transition to tariffs based more on cost causation.

[1]  Janusz Bialek,et al.  Tracing the flow of electricity , 1996 .

[2]  Jiuping Pan,et al.  An interval-based MADM approach to the identification of candidate alternatives in strategic resource planning , 2000 .

[3]  P. Sotkiewicz,et al.  Nodal pricing for distribution networks: efficient pricing for efficiency enhancing DG , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Jiuping Pan,et al.  Review of usage-based transmission cost allocation methods under open access , 2000 .

[5]  P. Sotkiewicz,et al.  Allocation of fixed costs in distribution networks with distributed generation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  F. Schweppe Spot Pricing of Electricity , 1988 .

[7]  M.E. de Oliveira,et al.  Network reconfiguration and loss allocation for distribution systems with distributed generation , 2004, 2004 IEEE/PES Transmision and Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX956).

[8]  J. H. Malinowski,et al.  Evaluation of Transmission Network Capacity Use for Wheeling Transactions , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[9]  Jiuping Pan,et al.  Review of usage-based transmission cost allocation methods under open access [discussion] , 2001 .

[10]  A. Conejo,et al.  Transmission Loss Allocation: A Comparison of Different Practical Algorithms , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Transmission network cost allocation based on equivalent bilateral exchanges , 2003 .

[12]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Z-Bus Loss Allocation , 2001 .

[13]  J. Mutale,et al.  Allocation of losses in distribution systems with embedded generation , 2000 .

[14]  M. Matos,et al.  Loss allocation in distribution networks with embedded generation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.