Clogging of microporous channels networks: role of connectivity and tortuosity

Abstract The aim of this work is to study the pore blocking by the use of microfluidic devices (microseparators) and numerical simulation approaches. The microseparators are made in PDMS and are constituted of an array of microchannels 20 μm wide with three types of structure: straight microchannels, connected microchannels (or aligned square pillars) and staggered square pillars in order to mimic merely the complexity of the flow encountered in filters or membranes (tortuosity, connectivity between pores). Direct observation with video microscopy of filtrations of 5 μm latex particles has been performed to examine the capture of particles. The results show a piling up of particles within the porous media leading to a clogging. The capture efficiency remains low (<0.1 %). In the case of filtration in the forest of pillars, the capture is faster and arises mainly between the pillars. The increase in tortuosity in the microseparator leads then to a rise of the clogging. It must be caused by the increase in critical trajectories leading to the capture of particles on the PDMS walls. At the same time, numerical simulations of filtration in parallel with microchannels have been performed in the same flow conditions with GeoDict software. The different kind of experimental deposit structure can be simulated, but there is still inaccuracy in the description of the accumulation kinetics. These discrepancies are probably due to the lack of accuracy to depict particle/particle colloidal interactions in simulations and the fact that re-suspension of particles after capture is not well described.

[1]  Howard A Stone,et al.  Mechanism for clogging of microchannels. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  D. Fletcher,et al.  Numerical simulation of colloidal dispersion filtration: description of critical flux and comparison with experimental results , 2006 .

[3]  M. Fujita,et al.  Simulation of fouling and backwash dynamics in dead-end microfiltration: Effect of pore size , 2012 .

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  In situ monitoring techniques for concentration polarization and fouling phenomena in membrane filtration. , 2003, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[5]  Pierre Aimar,et al.  Analysing flux decline in dead-end filtration , 2008 .

[6]  H. Scott Fogler,et al.  Multilayer Deposition of Stable Colloidal Particles during Flow within Cylindrical Pores , 1998 .

[7]  Robert W. Field,et al.  Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications , 2006 .

[8]  V. Starov,et al.  A model of the interaction between a charged particle and a pore in a charged membrane surface , 1999 .

[9]  A. Zydney,et al.  Effect of electrostatic, hydrodynamic, and Brownian forces on particle trajectories and sieving in normal flow filtration. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[10]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Particle transport in patterned cylindrical microchannels , 2012 .

[11]  M. Meireles,et al.  Colloidal surface interactions and membrane fouling: investigations at pore scale. , 2011, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[12]  M. T. Stamm,et al.  Particle aggregation rate in a microchannel due to a dilute suspension flow , 2011 .

[13]  Andreas Wiegmann,et al.  Toward Predicting Filtration and Separation: Progress & Challenges , 2009 .

[14]  B. Stoeber,et al.  Deposition of particles from polydisperse suspensions in microfluidic systems , 2010 .

[15]  Nouhad Abidine,et al.  Low fouling conditions in dead-end filtration: Evidence for a critical filtered volume and interpretation using critical osmotic pressure , 2005 .

[16]  J. A. V. BUTLER,et al.  Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids , 1948, Nature.

[17]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane) , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[18]  H. S. Fogler,et al.  Plugging by hydrodynamic bridging during flow of stable colloidal particles within cylindrical pores , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  M. T. Stamm,et al.  Cluster formation and growth in microchannel flow of dilute particle suspensions , 2011 .

[20]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Kinetics of deposition of colloidal particles in porous media , 1990 .

[21]  Eric Climent,et al.  Experimental investigation of pore clogging by microparticles: Evidence for a critical flux density of particle yielding arches and deposits , 2012 .

[22]  A. Zydney,et al.  Effects of membrane pore geometry on fouling behavior during yeast cell microfiltration , 2006 .

[23]  M. Elwenspoek,et al.  Determination of particle-release conditions in microfiltration: a simple single-particle model tested on a model membrane , 2000 .

[24]  D. Bourrier,et al.  Particle deposition onto a microsieve , 2009 .

[25]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Minier,et al.  Towards a description of particulate fouling: from single particle deposition to clogging. , 2012, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[27]  R. Holdich,et al.  Particulate fouling of surface microfilters with slotted and circular pore geometry , 2002 .

[28]  R. Adrian,et al.  On flow-blocking particle structures in microtubes , 2005 .