A Whiff of Reality: Empirical Evidence Concerning the Effects of Pleasant Fragrances on Work‐Related Behavior1

Two studies were conducted to investigate the potential effects on workrelated behavior of one environmental variable: pleasant fragrances. In Study 1, participants performed a word construction task under low or high stress while in the presence or absence of pleasant fragrances. Performance was significantly enhanced by fragrance in both stress conditions. In addition, exposure to pleasant fragrances significantly increased performance on an additional task (decoding written messages) completed by participants following exposure to stress. In Study 2, both exposure to pleasant fragrances and receipt of a small gift increased performance on the same word construction task used in Study 1. In addition, fragrance and a gift increased participants' willingness to engage in both immediate and delayed helping. Together, the results of these studies offer support for the view that pleasant fragrances can influence work-related behavior, and that such effects may be mediated, at least in part, by increments in positive affect.

[1]  M. Lamon,et al.  Unilateral Facial Contractions Produce Mood Effects on Social Cognitive Judgements. , 1992, Cognition & emotion.

[2]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of affect on categorization. , 1984 .

[3]  A. Baum,et al.  An Exploration of a Possible Physiological Explanation for Stressor Aftereffects1 , 1990 .

[4]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Self-Presentation in Job Interviews: When There Can Be “Too Much of a Good Thing”1 , 1986 .

[5]  A. Isen,et al.  The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation , 1986 .

[6]  Michael Milligan,et al.  The Air Pollution Experience and Physical Aggression1 , 1979 .

[7]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Operationism and the concept of perception. , 1956, Psychological review.

[8]  R. Baron,et al.  Reducing organizational conflict: an incompatible response approach. , 1984, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Environmentally Induced Positive Affect: Its Impact on Self‐Efficacy, Task Performance, Negotiation, and Conflict1 , 1990 .

[10]  J. George,et al.  Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  G. Keinan.  Decision making under stress: scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Cognition‐excitation interdependences in aggressive behavior , 1988 .

[13]  J. Rotton,et al.  Affective and Cognitive Consequences of Malodorous Pollution , 1983 .

[14]  Kenneth G. DeBono.  Pleasant Scents and Persuasion: An Information Processing Approach1 , 1992 .

[15]  John Sabini,et al.  Emotional State, Physical Well‐Being, and Performance in the Presence of Feigned Ambient Odor1 , 1990 .

[16]  R. Baron,et al.  Aggression-inhibiting influence of sexual humor. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  M. Appley,et al.  Dynamics of Stress , 1986 .

[18]  F. R. Schab,et al.  Odor memory: taking stock. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  A. Isen,et al.  Success, failure, attention, and reaction to others: The warm glow of success. , 1970 .

[20]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. , 1987 .

[21]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Physical Environments and Employee Reactions: Effects of Stimulus-Screening Skills and Job Complexity , 1991 .

[22]  R. Baron.  Olfaction and Human Social Behavior , 1981 .