Determining the input impedance of ECG amplifiers using accurate electrode modelling

OBJECTIVE The influence of the skin-electrode-amplifier interface and the input impedance of ECG recording amplifiers on transient response performance is investigated using accurate modeling of surface contact electrodes. The paper aims to establish the input impedance requirements of ECG recording amplifiers based on the electrical properties of the electrodes. APPROACH The IEC 60601 standard stipulates the performance requirements for electrocardiographs. Analyses and simulation of both dc and ac modes of coupling the electrodes to the input of the amplifier have been undertaken using an accurate double time-constant model of the electrodes in order to establish design constraints for amplifier input impedance to meet this performance specification. These have been backed up with bench tests. MAIN RESULTS Investigations carried out indicate that the minimum 10 MΩ resistance at the amplifier input recommended in the specification is insufficient when using some modern adhesive electrodes and increasingly popular un-gelled or dry electrodes. Design constraints are established based on the electrical properties of the electrodes. These constraints suggest that the input impedance of the amplifier should be as high as 10 GΩ and the amplifier ac coupled cut-off frequency should not to be higher than 0.05 Hz for all the electrode models considered. SIGNIFICANCE Signal distortions in the form of false S-wave creation and depression of the S-T segment have been observed when the previously recommended 10 MΩ input impedance is used in the amplifier. This distortion can lead to clinical misdiagnosis but can be avoided if the design constraints established in the paper are adopted.

[1]  Refet Firat Yazicioglu,et al.  ECG Signal Compression and Classification Algorithm With Quad Level Vector for ECG Holter System , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[2]  Krzysztof Tomczyk.  PROCEDURE FOR CORRECTION OF THE ECG SIGNAL ERROR INTRODUCED BY SKIN-ELECTRODE INTERFACE , 2011 .

[3]  Pedro Linares,et al.  Characterizing dry electrodes impedance by parametric modeling for arm wearable long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring , 2017, 2017 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[4]  G. Prats-Boluda,et al.  Towards the clinical use of concentric electrodes in ECG recordings: influence of ring dimensions and electrode position , 2016 .

[5]  Guglielmo Frigo,et al.  Denoising ECG Signal by CSTFM Algorithm: Monitoring During Motorbike and Car Races , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[6]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  Anubha Kalra,et al.  Critical review of electrocardiography measurement systems and technology , 2018, Measurement Science and Technology.

[8]  Sunyoung Kim,et al.  Correlation Between Electrode-Tissue Impedance and Motion Artifact in Biopotential Recordings , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[9]  J. Webster,et al.  Simultaneous comparison of 1 gel with 4 dry electrode types for electrocardiography , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[10]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Surface electromyographic signals using a dry electrode , 2011, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Medical Measurements and Applications.

[11]  Cedric Assambo,et al.  Low-Frequency Response and the Skin-Electrode Interface in Dry-Electrode Electrocardiography , 2012 .

[12]  Patrick Celka,et al.  Carmeli's S index assesses motion and muscle artefact reduction in rowers' electrocardiograms , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[13]  Carmen C. Y. Poon,et al.  Unobtrusive Sensing and Wearable Devices for Health Informatics , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  O. Vainio,et al.  A digital filter chip for ECG signal processing , 1994 .

[15]  Rosario Morello,et al.  A Smart ECG Measurement System Based on Web-Service-Oriented Architecture for Telemedicine Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Ramon Pallàs-Areny,et al.  Improved Fully Differential Analog Filters , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[17]  L. Kirkup,et al.  A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[18]  Ramon Pallas-Areny,et al.  Common mode rejection ratio for cascaded differential amplifier stages , 1991 .

[19]  Rebeca Goya-Esteban,et al.  Heart Rate Variability on 7-Day Holter Monitoring Using a Bootstrap Rhythmometric Procedure , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  G D Clifford,et al.  Signal quality indices and data fusion for determining clinical acceptability of electrocardiograms , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[21]  M. J. Burke,et al.  Establishing the Input Impedance Requirements of ECG Recording Amplifiers , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[22]  D. Tayler,et al.  Signal Distortion in the Electrocardiogram Due to Inadequate Phase Response , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Effect of Pressure on Skin-Electrode Impedance in Wearable Biomedical Measurement Devices , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[24]  Robert Rieger,et al.  Variable-Gain, Low-Noise Amplification for Sampling Front Ends , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[25]  Christopher M. Twigg,et al.  A Fully Reconfigurable Low-Noise Biopotential Sensing Amplifier With 1.96 Noise Efficiency Factor , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[26]  Marcelo Haberman,et al.  Insulating electrodes: a review on biopotential front ends for dielectric skin–electrode interfaces , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[27]  Voicu Groza,et al.  Impact of Skin–Electrode Interface on Electrocardiogram Measurements Using Conductive Textile Electrodes , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[28]  Ramon Pallàs-Areny,et al.  AC-coupled front-end for biopotential measurements , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  H V Pipberger,et al.  The low-frequency response of electrocardiographs, a frequent source of recording errors. , 1966, American heart journal.

[30]  Boreom Lee,et al.  A modified algorithm of the combined ensemble empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis for the removal of cardiac artifacts from neuromuscular electrical signals. , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[31]  J. Piskorowski.  Digital $Q$-Varying Notch IIR Filter With Transient Suppression , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[32]  Pieter Harpe,et al.  Motion-Artifact Reduction in Capacitive Heart-Rate Measurements by Adaptive Filtering , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[33]  N H Lovell,et al.  Electrocardiogram signal quality measures for unsupervised telehealth environments , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[34]  J. Webster,et al.  Dry electrodes for electrocardiography , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[35]  Jianqing Wang,et al.  Motion artefact removals for wearable ECG using stationary wavelet transform , 2017, Healthcare technology letters.

[36]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Recommendations for standardization and specifications in automated electrocardiography: bandwidth and digital signal processing. A report for health professionals by an ad hoc writing group of the Committee on Electrocardiography and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, , 1990, Circulation.

[37]  F al-Hatib,et al.  Patient-instrument connection errors in bioelectrical impedance measurement , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[38]  Luca Fanucci,et al.  Sensing Devices and Sensor Signal Processing for Remote Monitoring of Vital Signs in CHF Patients , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[39]  Mateo Aboy,et al.  A microcontroller-based portable electrocardiograph recorder , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  O. H. Schmitt,et al.  Report of committee on electrocardiography, American Heart Association. Recommendations for standardization of leads and of specifications for instruments in electrocardiography and vectorcardiography. , 1967, Circulation.

[41]  Philippe Ravier,et al.  A New Concept of Virtual Patient for Real-Time ECG Analyzers , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.