Comprehensive clone screening and evaluation of fed-batch strategies in a microbioreactor and lab scale stirred tank bioreactor system: application on Pichia pastoris producing Rhizopus oryzae lipase

BackgroundIn Pichia pastoris bioprocess engineering, classic approaches for clone selection and bioprocess optimization at small/micro scale using the promoter of the alcohol oxidase 1 gene (PAOX1), induced by methanol, present low reproducibility leading to high time and resource consumption.ResultsAn automated microfermentation platform (RoboLector) was successfully tested to overcome the chronic problems of clone selection and optimization of fed-batch strategies. Different clones from Mut+P. pastoris phenotype strains expressing heterologous Rhizopus oryzae lipase (ROL), including a subset also overexpressing the transcription factor HAC1, were tested to select the most promising clones.The RoboLector showed high performance for the selection and optimization of cultivation media with minimal cost and time. Syn6 medium was better than conventional YNB medium in terms of production of heterologous protein.The RoboLector microbioreactor was also tested for different fed-batch strategies with three clones producing different lipase levels. Two mixed substrates fed-batch strategies were evaluated. The first strategy was the enzymatic release of glucose from a soluble glucose polymer by a glucosidase, and methanol addition every 24 hours. The second strategy used glycerol as co-substrate jointly with methanol at two different feeding rates. The implementation of these simple fed-batch strategies increased the levels of lipolytic activity 80-fold compared to classical batch strategies used in clone selection. Thus, these strategies minimize the risk of errors in the clone selection and increase the detection level of the desired product.Finally, the performance of two fed-batch strategies was compared for lipase production between the RoboLector microbioreactor and 5 liter stirred tank bioreactor for three selected clones. In both scales, the same clone ranking was achieved.ConclusionThe RoboLector showed excellent performance in clone selection of P. pastoris Mut+ phenotype. The use of fed-batch strategies using mixed substrate feeds resulted in increased biomass and lipolytic activity. The automated processing of fed-batch strategies by the RoboLector considerably facilitates the operation of fermentation processes, while reducing error-prone clone selection by increasing product titers.The scale-up from microbioreactor to lab scale stirred tank bioreactor showed an excellent correlation, validating the use of microbioreactor as a powerful tool for evaluating fed-batch operational strategies.

[1]  Sujin Kim,et al.  Optimization of the functional expression of Coprinus cinereus peroxidase in Pichia pastoris by varying the host and promoter. , 2009, Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.

[2]  A. Murasugi,et al.  Comparison of Three Signals for Secretory Expression of Recombinant Human Midkine in Pichia pastoris , 2001, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[3]  Paula Jouhten,et al.  Metabolic flux profiling of recombinant protein secreting Pichia pastoris growing on glucose:methanol mixtures , 2012, Microbial Cell Factories.

[4]  J Büchs,et al.  Optical method for the determination of the oxygen-transfer capacity of small bioreactors based on sulfite oxidation. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  Ju Chu,et al.  GAP Promoter Library for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Pichia pastoris , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  Xinhao Ye,et al.  A simple fermentation strategy for high-level production of recombinant phytase by Pichia pastoris using glucose as the growth substrate , 2009 .

[7]  D. Mattanovich,et al.  Protein trafficking, ergosterol biosynthesis and membrane physics impact recombinant protein secretion in Pichia pastoris , 2011, Microbial cell factories.

[8]  Frank Kensy,et al.  High-throughput screening of Hansenula polymorpha clones in the batch compared with the controlled-release fed-batch mode on a small scale. , 2010, FEMS yeast research.

[9]  Peter Neubauer,et al.  Improved production of human type II procollagen in the yeast Pichia pastoris in shake flasks by a wireless-controlled fed-batch system , 2008, BMC Biotechnology.

[10]  P. Ferrer,et al.  Rivoflavin may interfere with on-line monitoring of secreted green fluorescence protein fusion proteins in Pichia pastoris , 2007 .

[11]  N. K. Khatri,et al.  Transcriptional response of P. pastoris in fed-batch cultivations to Rhizopus oryzae lipase production reveals UPR induction , 2007, Microbial cell factories.

[12]  Muralidhar R. Mallem,et al.  Improved production of monoclonal antibodies through oxygen-limited cultivation of glycoengineered yeast. , 2011, Journal of biotechnology.

[13]  D. Wong,et al.  An episomal expression vector for screening mutant gene libraries in Pichia pastoris. , 2005, Plasmid.

[14]  Russell H Robins,et al.  A Strategy for clone selection under different production conditions , 2011, Biotechnology progress.

[15]  J. Cregg,et al.  Heterologous protein expression in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. , 2000, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[16]  J. Bäckvall,et al.  Directed evolution of Candida antarctica lipase A using an episomaly replicating yeast plasmid. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[17]  R. Schmid,et al.  Optimization of the high-level production of Rhizopus oryzae lipase in Pichia pastoris. , 2001, Journal of biotechnology.

[18]  Wilfried Mokwa,et al.  Bioprocess Control in Microscale: Scalable Fermentations in Disposable and User-Friendly Microfluidic Systems , 2010, Microbial cell factories.

[19]  B. Hock,et al.  Comparison of two expression platforms in respect to protein yield and quality: Pichia pastoris versus Pichia angusta. , 2009, Protein expression and purification.

[20]  B. K. Lundholt,et al.  A Simple Technique for Reducing Edge Effect in Cell-Based Assays , 2003, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[21]  R. Bill,et al.  Developing a scalable model of recombinant protein yield from Pichia pastoris: the influence of culture conditions, biomass and induction regime , 2009, Microbial cell factories.

[22]  A. van Loon,et al.  An expression system matures: a highly efficient and cost-effective process for phytase production by recombinant strains of Hansenula polymorpha. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  P. Bork,et al.  Sequence-based factors influencing the expression of heterologous genes in the yeast Pichia pastoris--A comparative view on 79 human genes. , 2007, Journal of biotechnology.

[24]  Ashraf Amanullah,et al.  Twenty‐four‐well plate miniature bioreactor high‐throughput system: Assessment for microbial cultivations , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  Robert Huber,et al.  Microbial Cell Factories Robo-lector – a Novel Platform for Automated High-throughput Cultivations in Microtiter Plates with High Information Content , 2022 .

[26]  N. Callewaert,et al.  The HAC1 gene from Pichia pastoris: characterization and effect of its overexpression on the production of secreted, surface displayed and membrane proteins , 2010, Microbial cell factories.

[27]  Urs von Stockar,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the benefits of mixed feeds of sorbitol and methanol for the production of recombinant avidin with Pichia pastoris. , 2007, Journal of biotechnology.

[28]  Johannes Stadlmann,et al.  A multi-level study of recombinant Pichia pastoris in different oxygen conditions , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[29]  Karin Kovar,et al.  Promoter library designed for fine-tuned gene expression in Pichia pastoris , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  R. Fischer,et al.  Production of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) N‐A3 domain in Pichia pastoris by fermentation , 1999, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[31]  D Weuster-Botz,et al.  Development, parallelization, and automation of a gas-inducing milliliter-scale bioreactor for high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD). , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  J. Büchs,et al.  Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[33]  Byung-Kwon Choi,et al.  Regulation of alcohol oxidase 1 (AOX1) promoter and peroxisome biogenesis in different fermentation processes in Pichia pastoris. , 2013, Journal of biotechnology.

[34]  R. Fischer,et al.  Analysis of single-chain antibody production in Pichia pastoris using on-line methanol control in fed-batch and mixed-feed fermentations. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[35]  Brigitte Gasser,et al.  Engineering of bottlenecks in Rhizopus oryzae lipase production in Pichia pastoris using the nitrogen source-regulated FLD1 promoter. , 2009, New Biotechnology.

[36]  K. Riet,et al.  Review of Measuring Methods and Results in Nonviscous Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer in Stirred Vessels , 1979 .

[37]  Gabriel Potvin,et al.  Bioprocess engineering aspects of heterologous protein production in Pichia pastoris: A review , 2012 .

[38]  Antonio Villaverde,et al.  Unconventional microbial systems for the cost-efficient production of high-quality protein therapeutics. , 2013, Biotechnology advances.

[39]  S. Baldwin,et al.  A Pichia pastoris fermentation process for producing high-levels of recombinant human cystatin-C , 2001 .

[40]  W. Giang,et al.  Condensed protocol for competent cell preparation and transformation of the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. , 2005, BioTechniques.

[41]  Advanced methods for bioreactor characterization. , 1992, Journal of biotechnology.

[42]  P. Hyka,et al.  Use of a mixture of glucose and methanol as substrates for the production of recombinant trypsinogen in continuous cultures with Pichia pastoris Mut+. , 2012, Journal of biotechnology.

[43]  C. Arnau,et al.  The effect of glycerol mixed substrate on the heterologous production of a Rhizopus oryzae lipase in Pichia pastoris system , 2011 .

[44]  Michael Sauer,et al.  Pichia pastoris: protein production host and model organism for biomedical research. , 2013, Future microbiology.

[45]  Carolina Arnau,et al.  Optimization of the heterologous production of a Rhizopus oryzae lipase in Pichia pastoris system using mixed substrates on controlled fed-batch bioprocess. , 2010, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[46]  R. Takors,et al.  Human Chymotrypsinogen B Production with Pichiapastoris by Integrated Development of Fermentation and Downstream Processing. Part 1. Fermentation , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[47]  C. Brooks,et al.  Rapid expression screening of eukaryotic membrane proteins in Pichia pastoris , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  Frank Kensy,et al.  Validation of a high-throughput fermentation system based on online monitoring of biomass and fluorescence in continuously shaken microtiter plates , 2009, Microbial cell factories.

[49]  Václav Linek,et al.  Gas hold-up, mixing time and gas-liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficient of various multiple-impeller configurations: Rushton turbine, pitched blade and techmix impeller and their combinations , 2003 .

[50]  Genotyping of recombinant Pichia pastoris strains , 2006, Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters.

[51]  Frank Kensy,et al.  The baffled microtiter plate: Increased oxygen transfer and improved online monitoring in small scale fermentations , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[52]  Francisco Valero,et al.  Operational strategies, monitoring and control of heterologous protein production in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris under different promoters: A review , 2006, Microbial cell factories.

[53]  J. Cregg,et al.  Recombinant protein expression in Pichia pastoris , 2000, Molecular biotechnology.

[54]  Marco Oldiges,et al.  An automated workflow for enhancing microbial bioprocess optimization on a novel microbioreactor platform , 2012, Microbial Cell Factories.

[55]  M. Morange,et al.  Microbial Cell Factories , 2006 .

[56]  J. Büchs,et al.  Online respiration activity measurement (OTR, CTR, RQ) in shake flasks , 2004 .