Modeling of the composite action in fully restrained beam‐to‐column connections: implications in the seismic design and collapse capacity of steel special moment frames

SUMMARY: This paper investigates the effect of the composite action on the seismic performance of steel special moment frames (SMFs) through collapse. A rational approach is first proposed to model the hysteretic behavior of fully restrained composite beam-to-column connections, with reduced beam sections. Using the proposed modeling recommendations, a system-level analytical study is performed on archetype steel buildings that utilize perimeter steel SMFs, with different heights, designed in the West-Coast of the USA. It is shown that in average, the composite action may enhance the seismic performance of steel SMFs. However, bottom story collapse mechanisms may be triggered leading to rapid deterioration of the global strength of steel SMFs. Because of composite action, excessive panel zone shear distortion is also observed in interior joints of steel SMFs designed with strong-column/weak-beam ratios larger than 1.0. It is demonstrated that when steel SMFs are designed with strong-column/weak-beam ratios larger than 1.5, (i) bottom story collapse mechanisms are typically avoided; (ii) a tolerable probability of collapse is achieved in a return period of 50years; and (iii) controlled panel zone yielding is achieved while reducing the required number of welded doubler plates in interior beam-to-column joints. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Le-Wu Lu,et al.  SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF DEEP COLUMN-TO-BEAM WELDED REDUCED BEAM SECTION MOMENT CONNECTIONS , 2004 .

[2]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions , 2013 .

[4]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Seismic Response of Composite Moment-Resisting Connections. I: Performance , 1998 .

[5]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Development and Utilization of Structural Component Databases for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2013 .

[6]  R. Medina,et al.  A practical method for proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems , 2010 .

[7]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Development of Seismic Guidelines for Deep-Column Steel Moment Connections , 2004 .

[8]  Satoshi Yamada,et al.  Full scale shaking table collapse experiment on 4-story steel moment frame: Part 2 detail of collapse behavior , 2009 .

[9]  R. Leon Shear Strength and Hysteretic Behavior of Interior Beam-Column Joints , 1990 .

[10]  James O. Malley,et al.  ATC-72 of the PEER Tall Buildings Initiative: Interim Guidelines on Modeling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall Buildings , 2008 .

[11]  Farzin Zareian,et al.  Evaluation of Seismic Collapse Performance of Steel Special Moment Resisting Frames Using FEMA P695 (ATC-63) Methodology , 2010 .

[12]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Cyclic Testing of Steel Moment Connections Rehabilitated with RBS or Welded Haunch , 2000 .

[13]  J. Bracci,et al.  Seismic Evaluation of Column-to-Beam Strength Ratiosin Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2001 .

[14]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Deterioration Modeling of Steel Components in Support of Collapse Prediction of Steel Moment Frames under Earthquake Loading , 2011 .

[15]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Experimental Study on Panel Zone Behavior in Steel Moment Resisting Frames , 2013 .

[16]  Sang-Hoon Oh,et al.  Seismic behavior and retrofit of steel moment connections considering slab effects , 2004 .

[17]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Collapse Assessment of Steel Moment Frames Based on E-Defense Full-Scale Shake Table Collapse Tests , 2013 .

[18]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Prediction and validation of sidesway collapse of two scale models of a 4‐story steel moment frame , 2011 .

[19]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Loading rate effects and influence of floor slab on the seismic performance of RBS connections for steel moment resisting frames , 1997 .

[20]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames , 2002 .

[21]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Seismic Response of Composite Moment-Resisting Connections. II: Behavior , 1998 .

[22]  Feng Zhou,et al.  Full-Scale Test of Composite Frame under Large Cyclic Loading , 2007 .

[23]  H Krawinkler,et al.  Shear in Beam-Column Joints in Seismic Design of Steel Frames , 1978, Engineering Journal.

[24]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .