Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy?

PURPOSE To determine the diagnostic performance of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) for detection of causes of death and to investigate the feasibility of MIA as an alternative to conventional autopsy (CA) in the clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved the MIA procedure and study, and informed consent was obtained for all deceased patients from relatives. Thirty deceased patients (19 men, 11 women; age range, 46-79 years), for whom family permission for CA on medical grounds had already been obtained, underwent additional evaluation with MIA prior to CA. MIA consisted of whole-body 16-section computed tomography (CT) and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, followed by ultrasonography-guided 12-gauge needle biopsy of heart, both lungs, liver, both kidneys, and spleen. Percentage agreement between MIA and CA on cause of death was evaluated. Sensitivity and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of MIA for detection of overall (major plus minor) findings, with CA as the reference standard, were calculated. Specificity was calculated for overall findings. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the effect of the clustered nature of the data. RESULTS In 23 patients (77%), MIA and CA were in agreement on the cause of death. Sensitivity of MIA for detection of overall findings and detection of major findings was 93% (95% CI: 90%, 96%) and 94% (95% CI: 87%, 97%), respectively. Specificity was 99% (95% CI: 98%, 99%) for detection of overall findings. MIA failed to demonstrate acute myocardial infarction as the cause of death in four patients. Sensitivity analysis indicated a negligible correlation between observations within each patient. CT was superior to MR for detection of pneumothorax and calcifications. MR was superior to CT for detection of brain abnormalities and pulmonary embolus. With biopsy only, detection of disease in 55 organs was possible, which included 27 major findings. CONCLUSION MIA is a feasible procedure with high diagnostic performance for detection of common causes of death such as pneumonia and sepsis; MIA failed to demonstrate cardiac diseases, such as acute myocardial infarction and endocarditis, as underlying cause of death. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/250/3/897//DC1.

[1]  A. Christe,et al.  Two-step postmortem angiography with a modified heart-lung machine: preliminary results. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  E. Staab,et al.  Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. , 1990, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  P. J. Howanitz,et al.  The autopsy as a performance measurement tool--diagnostic discrepancies and unresolved clinical questions: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 2479 autopsies from 248 institutions. , 1999, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  K. Shojania,et al.  The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  C. Marwick Pathologists request autopsy revival. , 1995, JAMA.

[6]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Low-tech autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: continued value for quality assurance and patient safety. , 1998, JAMA.

[7]  Michael O'Brien,et al.  Postmortem whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to autopsy: Preliminary clinical experience , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Martin Sonnenschein,et al.  Post-mortem tissue sampling using computed tomography guidance. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[9]  J. Sinard Factors affecting autopsy rates, autopsy request rates, and autopsy findings at a large academic medical center. , 2001, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[10]  C. Hind,et al.  Attitudes of junior medical staff to requesting permission for autopsy. , 1994, Postgraduate medical journal.

[11]  R. Bisset Magnetic resonance imaging may be alternative to necropsy , 1998, BMJ.

[12]  A Hadgu,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity for correlated observations. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  G. Rutty Essentials of autopsy practice : new advances, trends and developments , 2008 .

[14]  Geller Sa Religious attitudes and the autopsy. , 1984 .

[15]  H. Akutsu,et al.  Postmortem computed tomography for detecting causes of sudden death in infants and children: retrospective review of cases , 2006, Radiation Medicine.

[16]  C C Berry,et al.  A tutorial on confidence intervals for proportions in diagnostic radiology. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  T. Riepert,et al.  Prospektive Untersuchung zur Wertigkeit der postmortalen Computertomographie im Vergleich zur Autopsie , 2005 .

[18]  C. Boesch,et al.  Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)--a feasibility study. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  R. Yesner,et al.  A symposium on the autopsy. , 1985, Pathology annual.

[20]  E. Dorff End-of-life: Jewish perspectives , 2005, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[22]  P. Ursell,et al.  Autopsy Pathology: A Manual and Atlas , 2003 .

[23]  M. Barbieri,et al.  Accuracy of clinical diagnoses in a teaching hospital: a review of 997 autopsies , 1993, Journal of internal medicine.

[24]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[25]  L. Nichols,et al.  Are autopsies obsolete? , 1998, American journal of clinical pathology.

[26]  Susumu Kandatsu,et al.  Introduction of autopsy imaging redefines the concept of autopsy: 37 cases of clinical experience , 2003, Pathology international.

[27]  E W Benbow,et al.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison with conventional autopsy , 2003, Histopathology.

[28]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .