Extracellular Vesicles Isolation from Large Volume Samples Using a Polydimethylsiloxane-Free Microfluidic Device

Extracellular vesicles (EV) have many attributes important for biomedicine; however, current EV isolation methods require long multi-step protocols that generally involve bulky equipment that cannot be easily translated to clinics. Our aim was to design a new cyclic olefin copolymer–off-stoichiometry thiol-ene (COC–OSTE) asymmetric flow field fractionation microfluidic device that could isolate EV from high-volume samples in a simple and efficient manner. We tested the device with large volumes of urine and conditioned cell media samples, and compared it with the two most commonly used EV isolation methods. Our device was able to separate particles by size and buoyancy, and the attained size distribution was significantly smaller than other methods. This would allow for targeting EV size fractions of interest in the future. However, the results were sample dependent, with some samples showing significant improvement over the current EV separation methods. We present a novel design for a COC–OSTE microfluidic device, based on bifurcating asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (A4F) technology, which is able to isolate EV from large volume samples in a simple, continuous-flow manner. Its potential to be mass-manufactured increases the chances of implementing EV isolation in a clinical or industry-friendly setting, which requires high repeatability and throughput.

[1]  P. Salipante Microfluidic techniques for mechanical measurements of biological samples. , 2023, Biophysics reviews.

[2]  A. Llorente,et al.  Plasma and urinary extracellular vesicles as a source of RNA biomarkers for prostate cancer in liquid biopsies , 2023, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[3]  A. Spule,et al.  Bifurcated Asymmetric Field Flow Fractionation of Nanoparticles in PDMS-Free Microfluidic Devices for Applications in Label-Free Extracellular Vesicle Separation , 2023, Polymers.

[4]  M. Speeckaert,et al.  Urinary Extracellular Vesicles in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Bench to Bedside? , 2023, Diagnostics.

[5]  T. Laurell,et al.  Advancement and obstacles in microfluidics-based isolation of extracellular vesicles , 2022, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[6]  R. Vago,et al.  Urine stabilization and normalization strategies favor unbiased analysis of urinary EV content , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[7]  D. Ghezzi,et al.  Conformable neural interface based on off-stoichiometry thiol-ene-epoxy thermosets , 2022, bioRxiv.

[8]  Maryam Feghhi,et al.  A review on exosomes application in clinical trials: perspective, questions, and challenges , 2022, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[9]  H. Qian,et al.  Small extracellular vesicles isolation and separation: Current techniques, pending questions and clinical applications , 2022, Theranostics.

[10]  Peng Cheng,et al.  Extracellular vesicles as an emerging drug delivery system for cancer treatment: Current strategies and recent advances. , 2022, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[11]  S. Schwaminger,et al.  Microfluidic Approaches for Affinity-Based Exosome Separation , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[12]  F. Revol-Cavalier,et al.  Real-time monitoring of oxygen levels within thermoplastic organ-on-chip devices , 2022, Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X.

[13]  D. Beebe,et al.  A role for microfluidic systems in precision medicine , 2022, Nature Communications.

[14]  M. Packirisamy,et al.  Microfluidic Platforms for the Isolation and Detection of Exosomes: A Brief Review , 2022, Micromachines.

[15]  E. Martens-Uzunova,et al.  Extracellular vesicles as a source of prostate cancer biomarkers in liquid biopsies: a decade of research , 2021, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  D. Greening,et al.  Development of Extracellular Vesicle Therapeutics: Challenges, Considerations, and Opportunities , 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[17]  M. Ottens,et al.  Automation and miniaturization: enabling tools for fast, high‐throughput process development in integrated continuous biomanufacturing , 2021, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology.

[18]  Aufried T. M. Lenferink,et al.  PDMS Curing Inhibition on 3D-Printed Molds: Why? Also, How to Avoid It? , 2021, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  A. Hill,et al.  Urinary extracellular vesicles: A position paper by the Urine Task Force of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles , 2021, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[20]  G. Jenster,et al.  Comparing Approaches to Normalize, Quantify, and Characterize Urinary Extracellular Vesicles , 2021, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[21]  A. Russom,et al.  High throughput viscoelastic particle focusing and separation in spiral microchannels , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[22]  T. Huang,et al.  Acoustofluidic centrifuge for nanoparticle enrichment and separation , 2021, Science Advances.

[23]  A. Fazeli,et al.  Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) Using Benchtop Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) Columns. , 2021, Methods in molecular biology.

[24]  M. Hoorfar,et al.  Exploiting Microfluidics for Extracellular Vesicle Isolation and Characterization: Potential Use for Standardized Embryo Quality Assessment , 2021, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[25]  M. Riekkola,et al.  Modern isolation and separation techniques for extracellular vesicles. , 2020, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  Ana C. Gregório,et al.  Employing Flow Cytometry to Extracellular Vesicles Sample Microvolume Analysis and Quality Control , 2020, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[27]  Rienk Nieuwland,et al.  Methods for Separation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles: Results of a Worldwide Survey Performed by the ISEV Rigor and Standardization Subcommittee , 2020, Cells.

[28]  A. Saleem,et al.  A Review of Exosomal Isolation Methods: Is Size Exclusion Chromatography the Best Option? , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[29]  J. Kutter,et al.  Thiol-Ene Based Polymers as Versatile Materials for Microfluidic Devices for Life Sciences Applications. , 2020, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[30]  C. Richardson,et al.  A comparison of methods for the isolation and separation of extracellular vesicles from protein and lipid particles in human serum , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[31]  D. Lyden,et al.  Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation technology for exomere and small extracellular vesicle separation and characterization , 2019, Nature Protocols.

[32]  Jing Xu,et al.  Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines , 2018, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles.

[33]  V. Vlaeminck-Guillem Extracellular Vesicles in Prostate Cancer Carcinogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[34]  L. Zaharenko,et al.  Genome Database of the Latvian Population (LGDB): Design, Goals, and Primary Results , 2018, Journal of epidemiology.

[35]  P. Laktionov,et al.  Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles: General Methodologies and Latest Trends , 2018, BioMed research international.

[36]  Takamasa Ishidome,et al.  High Purity Isolation and Sensitive Quantification of Extracellular Vesicles Using Affinity to TIM4 , 2017, Current protocols in cell biology.

[37]  Jesse V Jokerst,et al.  The Exosome Total Isolation Chip. , 2017, ACS nano.

[38]  S. Lorenz,et al.  Identification of non-invasive miRNAs biomarkers for prostate cancer by deep sequencing analysis of urinary exosomes , 2017, Molecular Cancer.

[39]  Guoqing Hu,et al.  Field-Free Isolation of Exosomes from Extracellular Vesicles by Microfluidic Viscoelastic Flows. , 2017, ACS nano.

[40]  C. Denning,et al.  Small molecule absorption by PDMS in the context of drug response bioassays , 2017, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[41]  James W. Clancy,et al.  Biology and biogenesis of shed microvesicles , 2016, Small GTPases.

[42]  Ksenija Kogej,et al.  Size characterization and quantification of exosomes by asymmetrical-flow field-flow fractionation. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[43]  T. Haraldsson,et al.  Reaction injection molding and direct covalent bonding of OSTE+ polymer microfluidic devices , 2015 .

[44]  L. O’Driscoll,et al.  Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions , 2015, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[45]  Melissa Ly,et al.  The human urine virome in association with urinary tract infections , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[46]  C. Théry,et al.  Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. , 2014, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[47]  M. Yáñez-Mó,et al.  Tetraspanins in Extracellular Vesicle Formation and Function , 2014, Front. Immunol..

[48]  D. Beebe,et al.  The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research , 2014, Nature.

[49]  N. Kosaka,et al.  Comparative marker analysis of extracellular vesicles in different human cancer types , 2013, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[50]  Nae Yoon Lee,et al.  A facile route for irreversible bonding of plastic-PDMS hybrid microdevices at room temperature. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[51]  M. Hussain,et al.  Chylomicron assembly and catabolism: role of apolipoproteins and receptors. , 1996, Biochimica et biophysica acta.