Cosmic-ray neutron probes for satellite soil moisture validation

Low resolution satellite products are often validated by point-scale in-situ soil moisture measurements from TDR/FDR devices, where the scale mismatch limits the quality of validation efforts in heterogeneous regions. In Cosmic Ray Neutron Probes (CRNP) provide area-average soil moisture within a 150–250 m radius footprint, so that they are able to fill the scale gap between both systems. In this study we evaluate differences and communalities between CRNP observations, and surface soil moisture products from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2), the METOP-A/B Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), the Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP), the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), as well as simulations from the Global Land Data Assimilation System Version 2 (GLDAS2). CRNPs within the Rur catchment in Germany have been selected for comparison. Standard validation scores identified SMAP to provide a high accuracy soil moisture product with low noise or uncertainties as compared to CRNPs.

[1]  Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen,et al.  Calibration of a catchment scale cosmic-ray probe network: A comparison of three parameterization methods , 2014 .

[2]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  COSMOS: the COsmic-ray Soil Moisture Observing System , 2012 .

[3]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Brightness Temperature and Soil Moisture Validation at Different Scales During the SMOS Validation Campaign in the Rur and Erft Catchments, Germany , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  T. Ferré,et al.  Nature's neutron probe: Land surface hydrology at an elusive scale with cosmic rays , 2010 .

[5]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Multispectral remotely sensed data in modelling the annual variability of nitrate concentrations in the leachate , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Irena Hajnsek,et al.  Investigation of SMAP Fusion Algorithms With Airborne Active and Passive L-Band Microwave Remote Sensing , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Muddu Sekhar,et al.  Validation of Spaceborne and Modelled Surface Soil Moisture Products with Cosmic-Ray Neutron Probes , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[8]  M. Zreda,et al.  Footprint characteristics revised for field‐scale soil moisture monitoring with cosmic‐ray neutrons , 2015, 1602.04469.

[9]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  A Preliminary Study toward Consistent Soil Moisture from AMSR2 , 2015 .

[10]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Catchment scale validation of SMOS and ASCAT soil moisture products using hydrological modeling and temporal stability analysis , 2014 .

[11]  Irena Hajnsek,et al.  TERENO - Long-term monitoring network for terrestrial environmental research , 2012 .

[12]  C. Montzka,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval from airborne L-band passive microwave using high resolution multispectral data , 2014 .

[13]  Venkat Lakshmi,et al.  Soil Moisture Remote Sensing: State‐of‐the‐Science , 2017 .

[14]  G. Waldhoff,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Its Temporal Course on Arable Land: Combining Field Measurements, Remote Sensing and Simulation in a Comprehensive Data Analysis Approach (CDAA) , 2016, PloS one.

[15]  M. Zreda,et al.  Footprint diameter for a cosmic‐ray soil moisture probe: Theory and Monte Carlo simulations , 2013 .

[16]  Kelly K. Caylor,et al.  Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites , 2017, Remote Sensing of Environment.