Surface microscopy for discriminating between common urticaria and urticarial vasculitis.

BACKGROUND Urticarial vasculitis is a clinicopathological entity that overlaps with common urticaria, and biopsy is required for differentiation between them. OBJECTIVE To determine, for the first time, if skin surface microscopy can aid in the clinical differentiation between common urticaria and urticarial vasculitis in daily practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS Lesions in 20 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of urticaria were studied by biopsy and skin surface microscopy (10x dermoscope) after covering the lesions with olive oil. Lesions were photographed with Dermaphot equipment. A biopsy was taken from all patients. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and Cohen kappa statistics (intra-observer reproducibility). RESULTS Two dermoscopic patterns were observed: (i). a red-lined vascular pattern (17/20 patients); and (ii). a purpuric globular pattern (3/20 patients). Leucocytoclastic vasculitis was demonstrated histologically in all lesions presenting purpuric globules (3/3) but in none of the lesions presenting a dermoscopic red-lined pattern (P < 0.0008). The intra-observer reproducibility for scoring the red lines and purpuric globules was excellent (kappa=0.8). CONCLUSION The results of this pilot study suggest that skin surface microscopy, using a 10x dermoscope, detects purpuric globules in urticarial lesions, and that purpuric globules indicate underlying leucocytoclastic vasculitis.

[1]  F. Vazquez-Lopez,et al.  The hand-held dermatoscope improves the clinical evaluation of port-wine stains. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  Francisco Vázquez-López,et al.  The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy does not apply to small melanocytic skin lesions. , 2001 .

[3]  P. Aegerter,et al.  Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. , 2001, Archives of dermatology.

[4]  J. Raynauld,et al.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology preliminary classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: addition of severe nailfold capillaroscopy abnormalities markedly increases the sensitivity for limited scleroderma. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  T Moore,et al.  Quantitation of microcirculatory abnormalities in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis by video capillaroscopy. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[6]  H. Moutsopoulos,et al.  Microvascular abnormalities in Sjögren's syndrome: nailfold capillaroscopy. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[7]  C. Ph.  New techniques for clinical assessment of the peripheral microcirculation. , 1999 .

[8]  P. Carpentier.  Nouvelles m??thodes d????valuation clinique de la microcirculation cutan??e , 1999 .

[9]  P. Carpentier.  New techniques for clinical assessment of the peripheral microcirculation. , 1999, Drugs.

[10]  R. Bauersachs,et al.  The poor man’s capillary microscope. A novel technique for the assessment of capillary morphology , 1997, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  I. Stanganelli,et al.  Intraobserver agreement in interpretation of digital epiluminescence microscopy. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[12]  M. Dahl.  Clinical pearl: diascopy helps diagnose urticarial vasculitis. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[13]  J. Toribio,et al.  Incidence of Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis in Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria; Study of 100 Cases , 1989, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[14]  K. Stenn,et al.  Histologic diagnosis of inflammatory skin diseases , 1982 .