Trabecular Titanium™ Cups and Augments in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical Results, Radiology and Survival Outcomes

Background Large acetabular defects remain a challenge in hip revision arthroplasty. Experience with Trabecular Titanium™ (TT) cups (Limacorporate S.p.a.) has not been widely reported. Therefore, we assessed the survivorship and clinical and radiological outcomes of patients receiving TT cups, with or without supplementary trabecular titanium hemispherical modules for acetabular reconstruction, in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Between January 2009 and July 2014, we performed 67 revisions and 5 primary THAs using TT cups in 69 patients. To achieve stability and/or restore the hip's centre of rotation, hemispherical modules were used in 17 cases based on pre-operative templating and/or intraoperative findings. Mean follow-up was 30.5 months. Acetabular bone defects were classified according to the Paprosky classification. Survivorship, functional outcomes (Merle d'Aubigné) and radiological outcomes were analysed. Results 8 patients underwent cup revision: 2 for loosening, 3 for infection, and 3 for hip dislocation. The remaining cases did not present radiological signs of loosening. None of the cases with Paprosky type I classifications needed revision, while 4 with type II and 4 with type III needed revision (p = 0.028). The respective mean values for pain, walking, and range of motion (Merle d'Aubigné scores ± standard deviation) were 3.6 ± 1.4, 3.7 ± 0.7, and 3.8 ± 0.6 pre-operatively, and 5.7 ± 0.7, 5.3 ± 0.7, and 5.6 ± 0.7 at the latest follow-up (p<0.001). Conclusions In the short term, results with TT cups appear to be encouraging, with satisfactory survival rates for both simple and complex cases.

[1]  M. Aubin,et al.  Radiostereometric analysis study of tantalum compared with titanium acetabular cups and highly cross-linked compared with conventional liners in young patients undergoing total hip replacement. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  M. Kokavec,et al.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[3]  F. Benazzo,et al.  Trabecular titanium can induce in vitro osteogenic differentiation of human adipose derived stem cells without osteogenic factors. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[4]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Options for Managing Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty. a Systematic Review , 2014, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[5]  M. Klotz,et al.  Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  H. Malchau,et al.  Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis , 2013, International Orthopaedics.

[7]  D. Backstein,et al.  Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[8]  D. Backstein,et al.  Porous metal revision shells for management of contained acetabular bone defects at a mean follow-up of six years: a comparison between up to 50% bleeding host bone contact and more than 50% contact. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  J. Fernandes,et al.  Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  L. Fedrizzi,et al.  Characterization of cellular solids in Ti6Al4V for orthopaedic implant applications: Trabecular titanium. , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[11]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of modular trabecular metal acetabular cups. Short-term results in 64 hips. , 2009, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[12]  P. Papagelopoulos,et al.  Eight- to ten-year clinical and radiographic outcome of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  B. Masri,et al.  Modular Tantalum Augments for Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  X. Flecher,et al.  Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  S. Sporer,et al.  Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. , 2005, Instructional course lectures.

[16]  R. J. Lewis,et al.  Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  S. Volinia,et al.  Titanium-cell interaction: analysis of gene expression profiling. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[18]  K. Hardinge The direct lateral approach to the hip. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.