Increased Replication Stress Determines ATR Inhibitor Sensitivity in Neuroblastoma Cells

Simple Summary Neuroblastoma is a childhood cancer with poor survival and new therapies are urgently needed, especially for high-risk disease. Here, we demonstrate that novel drugs targeting a protein called ATR can specifically kill a type of high-risk neuroblastoma associated with MYCN expression. We show that the mechanism by which this occurs is via increasing the stress on cells when they replicate their DNA. Further, we show that by targeting ATR in combination with other drugs that cause replication stress, we can increase killing of both high-risk MYCN amplified and non amplified neuroblastoma. Abstract Despite intensive high-dose multimodal therapy, high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) confers a less than 50% survival rate. This study investigates the role of replication stress in sensitivity to inhibition of Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) in pre-clinical models of high-risk NB. Amplification of the oncogene MYCN always imparts high-risk disease and occurs in 25% of all NB. Here, we show that MYCN-induced replication stress directly increases sensitivity to the ATR inhibitors VE-821 and AZD6738. PARP inhibition with Olaparib also results in replication stress and ATR activation, and sensitises NB cells to ATR inhibition independently of MYCN status, with synergistic levels of cell death seen in MYCN expressing ATR- and PARP-inhibited cells. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that ATR inhibition increases the number of persistent stalled and collapsed replication forks, exacerbating replication stress. It also abrogates S and G2 cell cycle checkpoints leading to death during mitosis in cells treated with an ATR inhibitor combined with PARP inhibition. In summary, increased replication stress through high MYCN expression, PARP inhibition or chemotherapeutic agents results in sensitivity to ATR inhibition. Our findings provide a mechanistic rationale for the inclusion of ATR and PARP inhibitors as a potential treatment strategy for high-risk NB.

[1]  S. Campaner,et al.  MYC-Induced Replicative Stress: A Double-Edged Sword for Cancer Development and Treatment , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[2]  F. Westermann,et al.  Therapeutic vulnerabilities in the DNA damage response for the treatment of ATRX mutant neuroblastoma , 2020, EBioMedicine.

[3]  G. Mills,et al.  Combining PARP with ATR inhibition overcomes PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance in ovarian cancer models , 2020, Nature Communications.

[4]  S. Robinson,et al.  MYCN expression induces replication stress and sensitivity to PARP inhibition in neuroblastoma , 2020, Oncotarget.

[5]  N. Curtin,et al.  ATR Inhibition Potentiates PARP Inhibitor Cytotoxicity in High Risk Neuroblastoma Cell Lines by Multiple Mechanisms , 2020, Cancers.

[6]  Kumar Somyajit,et al.  ATR Signaling Uncouples the Role of RAD51 Paralogs in Homologous Recombination and Replication Stress Response. , 2019, Cell reports.

[7]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  Oncogenic MYC amplifies mitotic perturbations , 2019, Open Biology.

[8]  Heather L. Mulder,et al.  MYCN amplification and ATRX mutations are incompatible in neuroblastoma , 2018, Nature Communications.

[9]  G. Stewart,et al.  PARP1 and PARP2 stabilise replication forks at base excision repair intermediates through Fbh1-dependent Rad51 regulation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[10]  T. Conrads,et al.  ATR kinase inhibition induces unscheduled origin firing through a Cdc7-dependent association between GINS and And-1 , 2017, Nature Communications.

[11]  S. Miyano,et al.  Loss of DNA Damage Response in Neuroblastoma and Utility of a PARP Inhibitor , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  M. Piqueras,et al.  Deletion of 11q in Neuroblastomas Drives Sensitivity to PARP Inhibition , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  K. Cimprich,et al.  The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[14]  I. Screpanti,et al.  PARP inhibitors enhance replication stress and cause mitotic catastrophe in MYCN-dependent neuroblastoma , 2017, Oncogene.

[15]  R. Beckmann,et al.  The Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitor Prexasertib Induces Regression of Preclinical Models of Human Neuroblastoma , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  A. Ashworth,et al.  PARP inhibitor combination therapy. , 2016, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[17]  L. Zou,et al.  Functions, Regulation, and Therapeutic Implications of the ATR Checkpoint Pathway. , 2016, Annual review of genetics.

[18]  J. Birch,et al.  Factors associated with recurrence and survival length following relapse in patients with neuroblastoma , 2016, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  Yate-Ching Yuan,et al.  The Mechanism by Which MYCN Amplification Confers an Enhanced Sensitivity to a PCNA-Derived Cell Permeable Peptide in Neuroblastoma Cells , 2015, EBioMedicine.

[20]  L. Karnitz,et al.  Molecular Pathways: Targeting ATR in Cancer Therapy , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  A. Sala Editorial: Targeting MYCN in Pediatric Cancers , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[22]  S. Campaner,et al.  Myc induced replicative stress response: How to cope with it and exploit it. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[23]  A. Aguilera,et al.  Replication stress and cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[24]  Raquel Herrador,et al.  Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  David J. Duffy,et al.  p19-INK4d inhibits neuroblastoma cell growth, induces differentiation and is hypermethylated and downregulated in MYCN-amplified neuroblastomas. , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[26]  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013;60:985–993 , 2014 .

[27]  K. Cimprich,et al.  Causes and consequences of replication stress , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[28]  J. Maris,et al.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Neuroblastoma , 2013, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[29]  K. Cole,et al.  Combination therapy targeting the Chk1 and Wee1 kinases shows therapeutic efficacy in neuroblastoma. , 2013, Cancer research.

[30]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Mre11-dependent degradation of stalled DNA replication forks is prevented by BRCA2 and PARP1. , 2012, Cancer research.

[31]  Cynthia Winter,et al.  RNAi screen of the protein kinome identifies checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) as a therapeutic target in neuroblastoma , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. Maris Recent advances in neuroblastoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  T. Helleday,et al.  Hydroxyurea-Stalled Replication Forks Become Progressively Inactivated and Require Two Different RAD51-Mediated Pathways for Restart and Repair , 2010, Molecular cell.

[34]  T. Helleday,et al.  PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11‐dependent replication restart and recombination , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[35]  Y. Drew,et al.  Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Enhances Temozolomide and Topotecan Activity against Childhood Neuroblastoma , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[36]  Barbara Hero,et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  R. Eisenman,et al.  Myc's broad reach. , 2008, Genes & development.

[38]  K. Cimprich,et al.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  S. Elledge,et al.  Rad17 phosphorylation is required for claspin recruitment and Chk1 activation in response to replication stress. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[40]  T. Helleday,et al.  Spontaneous Homologous Recombination Is Induced by Collapsed Replication Forks That Are Caused by Endogenous DNA Single-Strand Breaks , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[41]  M. Schwab,et al.  Conditional expression of N-myc in human neuroblastoma cells increases expression of alpha-prothymosin and ornithine decarboxylase and accelerates progression into S-phase early after mitogenic stimulation of quiescent cells. , 1996, Oncogene.

[42]  H. Sather,et al.  Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  H. Varmus,et al.  Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. , 1984, Science.