Numerical and experimental investigation of the near zone flow field in an array of confluent round jets

Abstract Numerical simulations, using three different turbulence models (i.e., standard k – e , RNG k – e and Reynolds Stress Model [RSM]) is performed in order to predict mean velocity field as well as turbulence characteristics in the near zone of a 6 × 6 in-line array of unconfined confluent round jets. The numerical results are compared with experimental data acquired by Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). All the turbulence models used are able to reproduce the mean velocity field and the development of turbulent kinetic energy of the confluent round jets, but in general, the standard k – e and RSM model show better agreement with experimental data than the RNG model. In terms of mean velocity the second-order closure model (RSM) is not found to be superior to the less advanced standard k – e model in spite of the mean flow curvature present in the flow field. The RSM model, however, provides information on individual Reynolds stresses. RSM show satisfactory agreement of streamwise normal Reynolds stress and shear stress, but generally underpredicts the normal Reynolds stress in the spanwise direction. In comparison with plane twin jets, confluent round jets show a longer merging region. Within the merging region the maximum velocity of the confluent jets decay linearly. As the jets enter the combined region confluent jets have hardly any velocity decay, which leads to a higher maximum velocity for a combined confluent jet than a single round jet. The jet’s position within the configuration has a substantial impact on the velocity decay, length of the potential core, and the lateral displacement of the confluent jets. Side jets show faster velocity decay, shorter potential core and higher turbulence level compared to central jets. Side jets are also deformed and has a kidney shaped cross-section in the merging region. Corner jets interact less with neighboring jets compared to side jets, thereby extending the potential core and reducing the velocity decay in the merging region compared to side jets.

[1]  P. Spazzini,et al.  Experimental analysis of low-Reynolds number free jets , 2009 .

[2]  Leslie M. Smith,et al.  The renormalization group, the ɛ-expansion and derivation of turbulence models , 1992 .

[3]  A. Khan,et al.  The Merging of Two Unequal Axisymmetric Parallel Turbulent Jets , 2012 .

[4]  Joseph C. S. Lai,et al.  Two parallel plane jets: mean flow and effects of acoustic excitation , 1997 .

[5]  A. Vouros,et al.  Influence of a secondary, parallel, low Reynolds number, round jet on a turbulent axisymmetric jet , 2008 .

[6]  Tetsushi Okamoto,et al.  INTERACTION OF TWIN TURBULENT CIRCULAR JET , 1985 .

[7]  Joseph C. S. Lai,et al.  Two parallel plane jets: Comparison of the performance of three turbulence models , 1998 .

[8]  Bahram Moshfegh,et al.  A Newly Designed Supply Diffuser for Industrial Premises , 2010 .

[9]  M. J. Sheu,et al.  Investigation of two plane paralleltiinven ilated jets , 1990 .

[10]  Shigetaka Fujita,et al.  Turbulent Properties Of Twin Circular Free Jets With Various Nozzle Spacing , 2005 .

[11]  Youngjun Cho,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of impinging jet ventilation and comparison with wall displacement ventilation , 2002 .

[12]  Mark Davidson,et al.  Jet interaction in a still ambient fluid , 2003 .

[13]  H. Kamide,et al.  Numerical study on mixing of oscillating quasi-planar jets with low Reynolds number turbulent stress and heat flux equation models , 2000 .

[14]  Jeffrey B. Allen,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Turbulent, Parallel, Round Jets , 2010, 2010 DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program Users Group Conference.

[15]  R. Spall,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of two-dimensional parallel jets , 2001 .

[16]  F. Lien,et al.  Assessment of turbulence-transport models including non-linear rng eddy-viscosity formulation and second-moment closure for flow over a backward-facing step , 1994 .

[17]  Brian Launder,et al.  SECOND-MOMENT CLOSURE AND ITS USE IN MODELLING TURBULENT INDUSTRIAL FLOWS , 1989 .

[18]  L. Lourenço Particle Image Velocimetry , 1989 .

[19]  Allan Kirkpatrick,et al.  Centreline velocity decay measurements in low-velocity axisymmetric jets , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  S. Orszag,et al.  Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique , 1992 .

[21]  Ilinca Nastase,et al.  A comparison of three turbulence models for the prediction of parallel lobed jets in perforated panel optimization , 2011 .

[22]  R. Knystautas,et al.  The Turbulent Jet from a Series of Holes in Line , 1964 .

[23]  B. Launder,et al.  Mathematical Models of turbulence , 1972 .

[24]  Jeffrey B. Allen,et al.  Momentum Flux in Plane, Parallel Jets , 2004 .

[25]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986 .

[26]  H. A. Becker,et al.  Development of flow from multiple-jet burners , 1996 .

[27]  B. Launder,et al.  Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986, Physical review letters.

[29]  G. Padmakumar,et al.  Numerical investigation of mixing in parallel jets , 2012 .

[30]  H. Awbi Ventilation of buildings , 1873 .

[31]  Bahram Moshfegh,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of flow behavior in a confluent jet ventilation system for industrial premises , 2012 .

[32]  Eiichi Tanaka,et al.  The Interference of Two-Dimensional Parallel Jets : 1st Report, Experiments on Dual Jet , 1969 .

[33]  P. Bradshaw Effects of Streamline Curvature on Turbulent Flow. , 1973 .

[34]  Nigel B. Kaye,et al.  CFD Study of Merging Turbulent Plane Jets , 2011 .