Rational design of ornithine decarboxylase with high catalytic activity for the production of putrescine

Putrescine finds wide industrial applications in the synthesis of polymers, pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and surfactants. Owing to economic and environmental concerns, the microbial production of putrescine has attracted a great deal of attention, and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is known to be a key enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway. Herein, we present the design of ODC from Escherichia coli with high catalytic efficiency using a structure-based rational approach. Through a substrate docking into the model structure of the enzyme, we first selected residues that might lead to an increase in catalytic activity. Of the selected residues that are located in the α-helix and the loops constituting the substrate entry site, a mutational analysis of the single mutants identified two key residues, I163 and E165. A combination of two single mutations resulted in a 62.5-fold increase in the catalytic efficiency when compared with the wild-type enzyme. Molecular dynamics simulations of the best mutant revealed that the substrate entry site becomes more flexible through mutations, while stabilizing the formation of the dimeric interface of the enzyme. Our approach can be applied to the design of other decarboxylases with high catalytic efficiency for the production of various chemicals through bio-based processes.

[1]  Lars M Blank,et al.  Grand challenge commentary: Chassis cells for industrial biochemical production. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[2]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller , 2006, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[3]  S. Lee,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of putrescine: a four carbon diamine. , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  R. Ghosh,et al.  Crystallographic structure of a PLP-dependent ornithine decarboxylase from Lactobacillus 30a to 3.0 A resolution. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Andreas P. Eichenberger,et al.  Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7 , 2011, European Biophysics Journal.

[6]  Andrea Romano,et al.  Three-Component Lysine/Ornithine Decarboxylation System in Lactobacillus saerimneri 30a , 2013, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  H. Uehara,et al.  Structure and characterization of nylon 46 , 2007 .

[8]  E. Goldsmith,et al.  Multiple active site conformations revealed by distant site mutation in ornithine decarboxylase. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[9]  A. Pauliukonis,et al.  Lysine decarboxylase assay by the pH-stat method. , 1985, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  J. Sanders,et al.  Biomass in the manufacture of industrial products—the use of proteins and amino acids , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[11]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER , 2014, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[12]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[13]  Christoph Wittmann,et al.  Bio-based production of the platform chemical 1,5-diaminopentane , 2011, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[14]  G. Murphy,et al.  Long-range interactions in the dimer interface of ornithine decarboxylase are important for enzyme function. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[15]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER , 2007, Current protocols in protein science.

[16]  A. Fukamizu,et al.  Enhanced histamine production through the induction of histidine decarboxylase expression by phorbol ester in Jurkat cells , 2012, Molecular medicine reports.

[17]  Haixing Li,et al.  Lactic acid bacterial cell factories for gamma-aminobutyric acid , 2010, Amino Acids.

[18]  W. Houry,et al.  The enzymatic activities of the Escherichia coli basic aliphatic amino acid decarboxylases exhibit a pH zone of inhibition. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[19]  Jeong Wook Lee,et al.  Microbial production of building block chemicals and polymers. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[20]  V. Wendisch,et al.  Putrescine production by engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[21]  D. Nielsen,et al.  Engineering microbial chemical factories to produce renewable “biomonomers” , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[22]  C. Wittmann,et al.  Bio-based production of chemicals, materials and fuels -Corynebacterium glutamicum as versatile cell factory. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Amino acid substitution matrices. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.

[24]  Marc N. Offman,et al.  Rational engineering of L-asparaginase reveals importance of dual activity for cancer cell toxicity. , 2011, Blood.

[25]  P. Fernandes,et al.  Mechanism of formation of the internal aldimine in pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-dependent enzymes. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Jonathan Pevsner,et al.  Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) , 2005 .

[28]  T. Tanaka,et al.  The role of the flap residue, threonine 77, in the activation and catalytic activity of pepsin A. , 1999, Protein engineering.