Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies

OBJECTIVE:Polyps are missed during conventional colonoscopy, even with meticulous technique. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a prototype wide angle colonoscope is associated with a reduced miss rate for polyps.METHODS:Two studies were performed. In study 1, a total of 50 patients underwent back-to-back, same-day colonoscopy by a single examiner with the prototype wide angle colonoscope and with a standard colonoscope, with the order of scopes randomized. In study 1, an attempt was made to keep examination time with the two colonoscopes equal. In study 2, a total of 20 patients were examined, 10 by the same colonoscopist who performed study 1 and 10 by a second colonoscopist. In study 2, examiners tried to perform the examinations as quickly as accuracy would allow.RESULTS:In study 1, the miss rate for all polyps was lower with the wide angle colonoscope (20% vs 31%; p = 0.046), although the mean examination time with the wide angle instrument was shorter (6.75 min vs 7.64 min; p = 0.0005). There was no significant difference in detection of adenomas. Polyps, including adenomas, were missed in the peripheral endoscopic field more frequently with the standard colonoscope. In study 2, wide angle colonoscopy was associated with reductions in examination time of 25% and 30% for the two examiners, respectively. Miss rates were the same for one colonoscopist but were higher for the other colonoscopist when the wide angle instrument was used.CONCLUSION:A prototype wide angle colonoscope did not eliminate polyp miss rates. Wide angle colonoscopy has the potential to reduce examination time and improve visualization of the periphery of the endoscopic field of view, but improvements in resolution are needed.

[1]  Syed G. Shah,et al.  Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  A. Kalloo,et al.  Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. , 2002, Gastroenterology.

[3]  W. Atkin,et al.  Variability in yield of neoplasis in average risk individuals undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening , 2001 .

[4]  T. Fujii,et al.  Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK , 2000, The Lancet.

[5]  J. Crook,et al.  Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized trial. , 1999, Gastroenterology.

[6]  K. Okazaki,et al.  Efficacy of Total Colonoscopy with a Transparent Cap in Comparison with Colonoscopy without the Cap , 1998, Endoscopy.

[7]  D. McGee,et al.  Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  D. Rex,et al.  Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopy , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. , 2000, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[10]  John Baron,et al.  The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps , 1999, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[11]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[12]  D. Rex,et al.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. , 1997, Gastroenterology.