Characterization of north-eastern Australian environments using APSIM for increasing rainfed maize production

Recurring water stresses are a major risk factor for rainfed maize cropping across the highly diverse agro-ecological environments of Queensland (Qld) and northern New South Wales (NNSW). Enhanced understanding of such agro-ecological diversity is necessary to more consistently sample target production environments for testing and targeting release of improved germplasm, and to improve the efficiency of the maize pre-breeding and breeding programs of Qld and New South Wales. Here, we used the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) – a well validated maize crop model to characterize the key distinctive water stress patterns and risk to production across the main maize growing regions of Qld and NNSW located between 15.8° and 31.5°S, and 144.5° and 151.8°E. APSIM was configured to simulate daily water supply demand ratios (SDRs) around anthesis as an indicator of the degree of water stress, and the final grain yield. Simulations were performed using daily climatic records during the period between 1890 and 2010 for 32 sites-soils in the target production regions. The runs were made assuming adequate nitrogen supply for mid-season maize hybrid Pioneer 3153. Hierarchical complete linkage analyses of the simulated yield resulted in five major clusters showing distinct probability distribution of the expected yields and geographic patterns. The drought stress patterns and their frequencies using SDRs were quantified using multivariate statistical methods. The identified stress patterns included no stress, mid-season (flowering) stress, and three terminal stresses differing in terms of severity. The combined frequency of flowering and terminal stresses was highest (82.9%), mainly in sites-soils combinations in the west of Qld and NNSW. Yield variability across the different sites-soils was significantly related to the variability in frequencies of water stresses. Frequencies of water stresses within each yield cluster tended to be similar, but different across clusters. Sites-soils falling within each yield cluster therefore could be treated as distinct maize production environments for testing and targeting newly developed maize cultivars and hybrids for adaptation to water stress patterns most common to those environments.

[1]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Simulation of a legume ley farming system in northern Australia using the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator , 1996 .

[2]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III. Temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environments , 2000 .

[3]  K. McCosker,et al.  Identifying chickpea homoclimes using the APSIM chickpea model , 2008 .

[4]  Mark E. Cooper,et al.  Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry , 2004 .

[5]  G. McLean,et al.  Analysis of high yielding maize production – a study based on a commercial crop , 2008 .

[6]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  An integrated systems approach to crop improvement. , 2007 .

[7]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Environmental classification of maize-testing sites in the SADC region and its implication for collaborative maize breeding strategies in the subcontinent , 2005, Euphytica.

[8]  C. J. Peterson,et al.  Similarities among Test Sites Based on Cultivar Performance in the Hard Red Winter Wheat Region , 1992 .

[9]  A. E. Ainsley,et al.  Genstat 5 Reference Manual , 1987 .

[10]  Robert J. Farquharson,et al.  Diagnosis, extent, impacts, and management of subsoil constraints in the northern grains cropping region of Australia , 2010 .

[11]  Scott C. Chapman,et al.  Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials , 2008, Euphytica.

[12]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation , 2003 .

[13]  J. Crossa,et al.  Mega‐Environment Identification for Barley Based on Twenty‐Seven Years of Global Grain Yield Data , 2009 .

[14]  R. Cattell The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[15]  M. Robertson,et al.  Agronomy Of Maize In Australia: In Review And Prospect , 2003 .

[16]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Effect of nitrogen supply on maize yield. I: modeling physiological responses , 1995 .

[17]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Testing the CERES-Maize simulation model in a semi-arid tropical environment , 1989 .

[18]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[19]  Steve Langton,et al.  Classification of maize environments using crop simulation and geographic information systems , 2005 .

[20]  K. Chenu,et al.  Large-scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent-wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt--spatial and temporal trends. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[21]  Ky L. Mathews,et al.  Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype-environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia. , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[22]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. , 1990 .

[23]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. , 2000 .

[24]  J. Corbett,et al.  Using GIS Datasets to Classify Maize-Growing Regions in Mexico and Central America , 1993 .

[25]  G. Hammer,et al.  Reliability of production of quick to medium maturity maize in areas of variable rainfall in north-east Australia , 2008 .

[26]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Environmental control of phenology and leaf growth in a tropically adapted maize , 1989 .

[27]  R. C. Muchow Comparative productivity of maize, sorghum and pearl millet in a semi-arid tropical environment I. Yield potential , 1989 .

[28]  E. Runge Effects of Rainfall and Temperature Interactions During the Growing Season on Corn Yield1 , 1968 .

[29]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Model analysis of temperature and solar radiation limitations to maize potential productivity in a cool climate , 1995 .

[30]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Can Changes in Canopy and/or Root System Architecture Explain Historical Maize Yield Trends in the U.S. Corn Belt? , 2009 .

[31]  R. C. Muchow Comparative productivity of maize, sorghum and pearl millet in a semi-arid tropical environment II. Effect of water deficits , 1989 .

[32]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns in Australian wheat yield and their relationship with ENSO , 2002 .

[33]  D. E. Byth,et al.  Determination of the location and number of test environments for a wheat cultivar evaluation program , 1981 .

[34]  G. Hammer,et al.  Environment characterisation as an aid to improve barley adaptation in water-limited environments , 2010 .

[35]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes , 1997 .

[36]  R. Madhiyazhagan Modelling approach to assess the impact of high temperature and water stress on dry land maize , 2005 .