Modified fenestration with restorative spinoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis.

The authors developed an original procedure, modified fenestration with restorative spinoplasty (MFRS) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The first step is to cut the spinous process in an L-shape, which is caudally reflected. This procedure allows easy access to the spinal canal, including lateral recesses, and makes it easy to perform a trumpet-style decompression of the nerve roots without violating the facet joints. After the decompression of neural tissues, the spinous process is anatomically restored (spinoplasty). The clinical outcomes at 2 years were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale and patients' satisfaction. Radiological follow-up included radiographs and CT. Between January 2000 and December 2002, 109 patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication with or without mild spondylolisthesis underwent MFRS. Of these, 101 were followed up for at least 2 years (follow-up rate 93%). The average score on the self-administered JOA scale in 89 patients without comorbidity causing gait disturbance improved from 13.3 preoperatively to 22.9 at 2 years' follow-up. Neurogenic intermittent claudication disappeared in all cases. The patients' assessment of treatment satisfaction was "satisfied" in 74 cases, "slightly satisfied" in 12, "slightly dissatisfied" in 2, and "dissatisfied" in 1 case. In 16 cases (18%), a minimum progression of slippage occurred, but no symptomatic instability or recurrent stenosis was observed. Computed tomography showed that the lateral part of the facet joints was well preserved, and the mean residual ratio was 80%. The MFRS technique produces an adequate and safe decompression of the spinal canal, even in patients with narrow and steep facet joints in whom conventional fenestration is technically demanding.

[1]  M. Sassi,et al.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  T. Albert,et al.  Nonsurgical and surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2004, Instructional course lectures.

[4]  R. Benz,et al.  Current techniques of decompression of the lumbar spine. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  N. Crawford,et al.  Comparative Mechanical Properties of Spinal Cable and Wire Fixation Systems , 1997, Spine.

[6]  J. Katz,et al.  Postoperative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. The role of facet joint morphology. , 1993, Spine.

[7]  P. Robertson,et al.  Stress fracture of the pedicle. A late complication of posterolateral lumbar fusion. , 1993, Spine.

[8]  D. Perugia,et al.  The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  I. Redlund‐Johnell,et al.  Preoperative and Postoperative Instability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1989, Spine.

[10]  S. O’laoire,et al.  Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report. , 1988, Neurosurgery.

[11]  R. M. Joson,et al.  Preservation of the supraspinous ligament for spinal stenosis: a technical note. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[12]  尹明在,et al.  SPONDYLOLISTHESIS , 1937 .

[13]  中井 修 Long-term roentgenographic and functional changes in patients who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis , 1992 .

[14]  W. Taillard [Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents]. , 1954, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  W. Taillard Le Spondylolisthesis Chez L'enfant et L'adolescent1 (Etude de 50 cas) , 1954 .

[16]  Cobb,et al.  Outlines for the study of scoliosis , 1948 .