Visual fixation and tracking by flies: Mathematical properties of simple control systems

AbstractThe study of the orientation behavior of flies requires the consideration of a few simple control systems for fixation and tracking. In this paper two such control systems are analyzed, in terms of the corresponding difference and differential equations. The first control system corrects with a delay ɛ the angular trajectory proportionally to the error angle ψ; the second control system also corrects proportionally to the error angle ψ but only when the absolute value of ψ is increasing. The differential equations are (0) $$\mathop \psi \limits^ \circ (t) = - \alpha '\psi (t - \varepsilon ) + A'$$ and (*) $$\mathop \psi \limits^o (t) = - \alpha '\psi (t - \varepsilon ) \cdot u[\psi (t - \varepsilon )\mathop \psi \limits^o (t - \varepsilon )] + A'$$ u[ ] being the step function (u[x]=1 if x>0, otherwise u[x]=0). Under suitable restrictions on the parameters it is proved (a) that the difference equations (0') $$x_{n + 1} = x_n - \alpha x_n + A$$ and (*') $$x_{n + 2} = x_{n + 1} - \alpha x_{n + 1} \cdot u[x_{n + 1} \cdot (x_{n + 1} - x_n )] + A,$$ which can be associated to Eqs. (0) and (*), are “asymptotically equivalent” (for large n) if the time scale is “smoothed” over two time units and (b) that the second equation, with 0<α<2, always converge to a set of oscillating solutions of period 2 for arbitrary initial conditions. Numerical simulations show that the delay-differential equations behave in a similar way. We have also demonstrated with computer simulations that both control systems can satisfactorily predict the 3-D trajectory of a fly chasing another fly. The main biological implications of the analysis are: (1) The two control systems are practically equivalent descriptions of the fly's control of flight on a “coarse” time scale (2 times the fly's delay), consistently with an earlier more general derivation of Eq. (0) (Poggio and Reichardt, 1973). (2) On a fine time scale the second control system is characterized by an asymptotic oscillation with period twice the fly's delay. It is conjectured that a wide range of control systems of the same general type must have a similar oscillatory behavior. Finally, we predict the existence of asymptotic oscillations in the angular trajectory and the torque of tracking flies (if a control system of the second type is involved to a significant extent). Such oscillations should have a basic period of twice the effective reaction delay, and should be best detectable outside the binocular region. Closed loop experiments and the analysis of free flight trajectories may provide critical tests of this prediction.

[2]  J. Hale Theory of Functional Differential Equations , 1977 .

[3]  T. Collett,et al.  Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[4]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part I. A quantitative analysis , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[5]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of flight in flies , 1981 .

[6]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part II. Towards the underlying neural interactions , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[7]  Bernward Pick,et al.  Visual Flicker Induces Orientation Behaviour in the Fly Musca , 1974 .

[8]  B. Pick,et al.  Visual pattern discrimination as an element of the fly's orientation behaviour , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  G. Geiger Optomotor responses of the fly Musca domestica to transient stimuli of edges and stripes , 2004, Kybernetik.

[10]  G. Geiger Is there a motion-independent position computation of an object in the visual system of the housefly? , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Werner Reichardt,et al.  Visually induced height orientation of the fly Musca domestica , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  R. Wolf,et al.  On the fine structure of yaw torque in visual flight orientation ofDrosophila melanogaster , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[13]  Christian Wehrhahn,et al.  How is tracking and fixation accomplished in the nervous system of the fly? , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  K. Götz,et al.  Visual control of locomotion in the fruitfly Drosophila , 1973 .

[15]  C. Wehrhahn Flight torque and lift responses of the housefly (Musca domestica) to a single stripe moving in different parts of the visual field , 1978, Biological cybernetics.

[16]  U. an der Heiden,et al.  Delays in physiological systems , 1979 .

[17]  Werner Reichardt,et al.  A theory of the pattern induced flight orientation of the fly Musca domestica II , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  T. Poggio,et al.  3-D Analysis of the Flight Trajectories of Flies (Drosophila melanogaster) , 1980 .

[19]  Werner Reichardt,et al.  Musterinduzierte Flugorientierung , 1973, Naturwissenschaften.

[20]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  The orientation of flies towards visual patterns: On the search for the underlying functional interactions , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Karl Georg Götz,et al.  Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture in drosophila , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  Karl Georg Götz,et al.  The optomotor equilibrium of theDrosophila navigation system , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.