Improved sensitivity and limit-of-detection using a receive-only coil in magnetic particle imaging

Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is an imaging modality capable of quantitatively determining the 3D distribution of a magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) ensemble. In this work, we present a method for reducing the MNP limit of detection by employing a new receive-only coil (Rx-coil) for signal acquisition. The new signal detector is designed to improve the sensitivity and thus quality of reconstructed images. We present characterization measurements conducted with the prototype Rx-coil installed in a preclinical MPI scanner. The gradiometric design of the Rx-coil attenuates the unwanted signal contributions arising from the excitation field, leading to a 17 dB lower background level compared to the conventional dual-purpose coil (TxRx-coil), which is crucial for detecting low amounts of MNP. Network analyzer measurements of the frequency-dependent coil sensitivity, as well as spectral analysis of recorded MPI data demonstrate an overall increase of the coil sensitivity of about  +12 dB for the Rx-coil. Comparisons of the sensitivity distributions revealed no significant degradations in terms of homogeneity for the Rx-coil compared to the TxRx-coil in an imaging volume of 6  ×  3  ×  3 cm3. Finally, the limit of detection was determined experimentally for each coil type using a serial dilution of MNPs, resulting in values of 133 ng of iron for the conventional TxRx-coil and 20 ng for the new Rx-coil, using an acquisition time of 2 s. A linear relationship between the reconstructed signal intensities and the iron mass in the samples was observed with coefficients of determination (R2) of above 99% in the range of the limit of detection to 3 103ng(Fe). These results open the way for improved image quality and faster acquisition time in pre-clinical MPI scanners.

[1]  G. Pazour,et al.  Ror2 signaling regulates Golgi structure and transport through IFT20 for tumor invasiveness , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[2]  P. Karp,et al.  Unidirectional magnetic gradiometers , 1980 .

[3]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  A Field Cancellation Signal Extraction Method for Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[4]  B Gleich,et al.  A simulation study on the resolution and sensitivity of magnetic particle imaging , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  L. Trahms,et al.  Localization of a magnetic nanoparticle spot from features of the magnetic field pattern and comparison to a magnetic dipole fit , 2009 .

[6]  Jungwon Yoon,et al.  Real-Time Two-Dimensional Magnetic Particle Imaging for Electromagnetic Navigation in Targeted Drug Delivery , 2017, Sensors.

[7]  Bernhard Gleich,et al.  Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles , 2005, Nature.

[8]  Bernhard Gleich,et al.  Signal encoding in magnetic particle imaging: properties of the system function , 2009, BMC Medical Imaging.

[9]  Matthias Graeser,et al.  Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging. , 2013, Medical physics.

[10]  S. Maruyama,et al.  Development of Magnetic Nanocarriers based on Thermosensitive Liposomes and their Visualization using Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2016 .

[11]  M. Patterson,et al.  The use of magnetic field effects on photosensitizer luminescence as a novel probe for optical monitoring of oxygen in photodynamic therapy , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Tobias Knopp,et al.  Magnetic Particle Imaging for High Temporal Resolution Assessment of Aneurysm Hemodynamics , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  T Knopp,et al.  In vivo liver visualizations with magnetic particle imaging based on the calibration measurement approach , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Bernhard Gleich,et al.  Analysis of a 3-D System Function Measured for Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Jochen Franke,et al.  System Characterization of a Highly Integrated Preclinical Hybrid MPI-MRI Scanner , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Olaf Kosch,et al.  Concentration Dependent MPI Tracer Performance , 2016 .

[17]  Bo Zheng,et al.  An x-space magnetic particle imaging scanner. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[18]  R. Carson,et al.  Evaluation of bias and variance in low-count OSEM list mode reconstruction , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Bo Zheng,et al.  Projection X-Space Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  B Gleich,et al.  Three-dimensional real-time in vivo magnetic particle imaging , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Matthias Graeser,et al.  Towards Picogram Detection of Superparamagnetic Iron-Oxide Particles Using a Gradiometric Receive Coil , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Patrick Vogel,et al.  Traveling Wave Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Justin J. Konkle,et al.  Magnetic Particle Imaging With Tailored Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Tracers , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Jochen Franke,et al.  MPI Flow Analysis Toolbox exploiting pulsed tracer information – an aneurysm phantom proof , 2017 .

[25]  B Gleich,et al.  Weighted iterative reconstruction for magnetic particle imaging , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  J. E. Zimmerman,et al.  SQUID instruments and shielding for low‐level magnetic measurements , 1977 .

[27]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  S. Tumański Induction coil sensors—a review , 2007 .

[29]  T Knopp,et al.  Joint reconstruction of non-overlapping magnetic particle imaging focus-field data , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  D I Hoult,et al.  The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment. 1976. , 1976, Journal of magnetic resonance.